The lawyer accused of attacking attorney and state representative Edward DeLaney faces five counts, including attempted murder.
Augustus J. Mendenhall, 38, of Indianapolis, faces charges of attempted murder, a Class A felony; armed robbery, aggravated
battery, and criminal confinement, all Class B felonies; and resisting law enforcement, a Class A misdemeanor.
The charges stem from the attack on DeLaney, D-Indianapolis, in Carmel Saturday morning. According to the Carmel Police Department,
a witness called police after seeing DeLaney and Mendenhall in a car. The witness, who knew DeLaney, believed he may be in
trouble based on his behavior.
The meeting was arranged by Mendenhall, who contacted DeLaney about meeting at Catherine Drive in Carmel to discuss the possible
purchase of property near that location. At the time, DeLaney was unsure about who he was meeting, according to police.
When police arrived, they found Mendenhall on top of DeLaney, punching him in the head. When he saw police, Mendenhall ran
and was stunned before being taken into custody. DeLaney had injuries to his head and face and was transported to a hospital.
Police found a .25-caliber semi-automatic handgun while taking Mendenhall into custody.
Mendenhall, who was admitted to the Indiana Bar in October 2008, is being held without bond in the Hamilton County Jail.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.