ILNews

IP attorney heads fundraising campaign for United Way

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share


An Indianapolis attorney has taken on a nontraditional pro bono role, on top of his practicing intellectual property law at one of the city's largest firms.

Possibly the first practicing attorney to take on a task of this nature, veteran lawyer Don Knebel has set out as the 2010 campaign chair to expand the United Way donor base and raise as much as $40 million this year in central Indiana, which includes Marion and the surrounding counties.

He hopes to inspire both business and community members to offer more charitable contributions and get the legal community more involved than it has been, while branching out from those businesses and individuals who may not have contributed in the past. All are tough tasks in this struggling economy, but Knebel is confident that he can use his legal experience to help boost the amount of money and number of donors from years past.

"The motto last year was for the community to step up and increase donations despite the economy, but mine is that we're all in this together," said the Barnes & Thornburg partner who chairs the firm's IP group. "We all have people in our community who are less fortunate, and we all have to be a part of helping out."

Knebel took over the campaign chair role March 25, but this is the latest in a line of growing leadership roles that Knebel has held for the non-profit organization. Looking back on his involvement through the years, Knebel said he's proud to have finally stepped up and taken more of a leadership role. When he joined Barnes & Thornburg in 1974, his annual contribution was about $100 and that gradually increased through the years.

"I was not a particularly energetic contributor," he said. "But as the years went by, that changed."

At Barnes & Thornburg, Knebel volunteered on the firm's fundraising campaign through the years, helping to create an internal matching program for more involvement and working to get more associates involved, according to partner Wendy Brewer, who co-chairs the firm's United Way campaign. Contributions have nearly doubled in the past five years as a result, she said.

"Since Don's gotten involved, we've had more focus on fundraising here," Brewer said. "We've doubled what the firm's been giving through our attorneys, not the firm writing a check, and it's great to have him as an ally on this both internally but also as one of the emerging leaders of the overall United Way program."

In 2005 and 2007, Knebel chaired the United Way Tocqueville Society, a group of people willing to contribute at least $10,000 a year to the organization. He increased the number of donors to that high-dollar society during the two-year period, and as a result of that leadership and success, the United Way management decided to ask him to lead the central Indiana campaign.

"When you're a good volunteer, we don't let those people go at United Way," said Ellen Annala, United Way president and chief executive officer. "We wouldn't call Don a campaign chair in training, but he's got all the hallmarks of that. He did such a good job, and that's why he surfaced in leadership for United Way. He is very strategic and goal oriented, and he has the drive and organization to structure this campaign remarkably."

When the idea first surfaced more than a year ago, Knebel said he wasn't initially convinced that he was qualified or the best person for the task. Traditionally, the role has been filled by a high-level company executive, he said. But as he thought more about it, he determined that if he weren't able to step up, it wouldn't be appropriate to ask others to take on that role. With 36 years of experience as an attorney, Knebel admitted he may have some credibility to offer in doing this.

"As a lawyer, you get experience in organizing and pulling people together and presenting cases that resonate with people," he said. "That is what my job is here. To identify people and bring them together to get involved in the campaign, and get them enthused about the campaign."

With the tough economy and struggling business world, Knebel knows he has challenges to overcome. The United Way has raised considerable amounts of money in past years but has fallen shy of its goals for the past two years - $38.8 million of the $39 million goal last year, and $38.8 million of the $40 million goal in 2008. The $39 million goal was met in 2007, figures show.

During the past eight years, donor numbers have dwindled from 100,000 to 80,000 as larger companies have closed or cut back, and employees who may have contributed have either slashed their charitable giving or moved on to smaller businesses or into different areas, Knebel said.

Setting a fundraising goal doesn't happen until June, but Knebel has already filled his volunteer roster of cabinet members to handle specific areas such as life sciences, information technology, logistics, and manufacturing, he said. The cabinet members have monthly meetings, and Knebel said he's currently spending about 5 to 10 hours a week coordinating the United Way tasks on top of his own legal work.

So far, Knebel said the most gratifying part of this experience is increasing the visibility of this fundraising campaign and watching more people get excited about United Way. When the campaign began last fall, he said the little visibility in the community meant that anyone interested in knowing the status would basically have to drive to the office on North Meridian Street to look at the big fundraising thermometer.

That's changing overall, he said. But one area he hopes to personally focus on is the Indianapolis-area legal community, which by comparison doesn't contribute or get as involved as comparable markets, such as Atlanta. The central Indiana legal community gave $300,000 last year, up from the $130,000 five years ago.

That's positive growth, but Knebel said it pales in comparison to the likes of Eli Lilly, which raises about $9 million from employees.

"I know it's possible for our lawyers to be a bigger part of this, and one of my objectives is to make lawyers and firms see their obligation to the community," he said. "When the community looks back on my tenure in doing this, I hope we'll be as proud of the lawyers as anyone else in the community."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indianapolis employers harassment among minorities AFRICAN Americans needs to be discussed the metro Indianapolis area is horrible when it comes to harassing African American employees especially in the local healthcare facilities. Racially profiling in the workplace is an major issue. Please make it better because I'm many civil rights leaders would come here and justify that Indiana is a state the WORKS only applies to Caucasian Americans especially in Hamilton county. Indiana targets African Americans in the workplace so when governor pence is trying to convince people to vote for him this would be awesome publicity for the Presidency Elections.

  2. Wishing Mary Willis only God's best, and superhuman strength, as she attempts to right a ship that too often strays far off course. May she never suffer this personal affect, as some do who attempt to change a broken system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QojajMsd2nE

  3. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  4. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  5. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

ADVERTISEMENT