ILNews

Lawyer practiced realty, construction law

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana legal community has lost a former prosecutor and private attorney who, during his five decades of practice, established himself as a state and national expert in realty and construction law.

Greenwood attorney Joe N. Van Valer, 75, died Jan. 16 at Johnson Memorial Hospital in Franklin. The 1963 Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis graduate was the founding and senior partner at Van Valer Law Firm, located in a restored Civil War-era building in downtown Greenwood. The firm specializes in land use, development, and construction law.

Family and friends say Van Valer is often described as “the face of Greenwood” because he was prominent in the community and a pivotal force in making the city and state what it is today. Through the decades his legal work helped create the Greenwood Park Mall and thousands of home developments that multiplied by five the city’s then-population of 11,000 residents. His expertise in building and realty law reshaped that industry statewide and nationally on the home owner warranty front.

But more than that, Van Valer was a lawyer who was more concerned about knowing and having a relationship with his clients than the billable hour, and his fascination with the law transcended every other aspect of what he did in his professional life.

“He really enjoyed teaching about law and life,” said his daughter, Kim Van Valer. Kim worked at the family firm when she was young, and she returned to the firm in 2009 after serving as a Johnson Superior 3 judge.

“The idea of the law was a real philosophy of his, and it was not about just saying ‘this is the rule.’ To him, it was always about this being the way the world should work, that this is a structure worthy of people modeling their lives after. It’s not perfect by any means, but I got the real impression that he felt the law was man’s best effort to live right and impose a set of rules to guide us,” she added.

Throughout his career, Van Valer represented numerous developers who built new homes in Greenwood during the last few decades. His influence extended beyond his city and county. He helped draft laws creating the impact fees that developers pay to fund new parks and roads as well as a law that made the state one of the most consumer-friendly for implied home warranties that protect homebuyers from construction defects discovered within 10 years. Van Valer also lobbied for federal legislation that allowed private insurance companies to insure home warranties.

“He got very involved in development in the early 70s and helped develop the neighborhood that he and my mom lived in. That, and how it was paid for, became his areas of expertise,” Kim said.

Before opening the Van Valer Law Firm in the 1990s, Van Valer practiced at a variety of predecessor firms with other attorneys. He served as the Johnson County prosecutor from 1967 to 1974, and it was that role that led to an appearance in the late 1980s in the first episode of “America’s Most Wanted.” City and police officials said Van Valer was the first prosecutor to train police officers on how to handle evidence and testify in court. He also served as attorney for Greenwood Community Schools and was actively involved in many community projects.

Kim says her dad always had a “big picture vision of what a community should be,” an idea that came from his parents who were community leaders in Johnson County. His dad was a volunteer fire chief and newspaper editor, while his mother was the first executive director of the city’s chamber of commerce.

He obtained that community vision from his parents and carried it and a love for family on through the generations, Kim said. A family ritual for the past few decades involved her dad spending time with and entertaining his kids and 11 grandchildren, she said.

All four of his children, including Kim, worked at the family firm as soon as each was old enough to hold a job and follow instructions.

“I’ve done everything there is to do here,” Kim said. “He’d bring us in to the office, and at first we went to work to play … talking to each other on intercom phones was what we thought was the greatest thing since sliced bread. Then we did some organizing and filing, and eventually we just learned how a law office functioned. I really enjoyed it, and I think that did influence my career choice.”

Kim said her dad became ill last year and stopped coming into the office full-time.

“He loved working, just talking to clients,” she said. “Whatever the conversation was about, he just wanted to help people and use his knowledge to work through problems.”

Those remembering Van Valer say he was proud of his publications and the teaching he did through the years on topics such as farm estate planning, wealth management for closely held corporations, and the impact of interstate land sales. Van Valer received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Johnson County Builders Association and he received many other civic and development and legal awards during his career. He was a member of the board of directors of the Home Warranty Corporation of Washington D.C. for more than five years, and he also served on the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis governing board since 1975.

Memorial contributions can be made to the Johnson County Humane Society or the Joe N. Van Valer Pre-Law Fund in the advancement office at Franklin College, where he spent his undergraduate years.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indianapolis employers harassment among minorities AFRICAN Americans needs to be discussed the metro Indianapolis area is horrible when it comes to harassing African American employees especially in the local healthcare facilities. Racially profiling in the workplace is an major issue. Please make it better because I'm many civil rights leaders would come here and justify that Indiana is a state the WORKS only applies to Caucasian Americans especially in Hamilton county. Indiana targets African Americans in the workplace so when governor pence is trying to convince people to vote for him this would be awesome publicity for the Presidency Elections.

  2. Wishing Mary Willis only God's best, and superhuman strength, as she attempts to right a ship that too often strays far off course. May she never suffer this personal affect, as some do who attempt to change a broken system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QojajMsd2nE

  3. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  4. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  5. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

ADVERTISEMENT