You might describe attorney Chris W. Cotterill as a rising star in the Hoosier legal community.
At age 33 and less than a decade out of law school, he's gone from working as an associate at a private law firm, then
serving as general counsel for a key state technology department, to becoming Indianapolis and Marion County's top in-house
lawyer and now chief of staff for the city's mayor.
This is all within seven years of graduating in 2002 from what's now Indiana University Maurer School of Law - Bloomington.
While he's technically stepped out of the Office of Corporation Counsel and being the city-county's top lawyer after
almost two years, Cotterill remains a key advisor for Mayor Greg Ballard and now considers himself a different kind of in-house
counsel for the state's largest city.
"You can take the lawyer out of the courtroom, but you can't take the lawyer out of the person," he said. "This
is very different from that of the corporate counsel, in that you're not handling litigation or discussing the latest
Supreme Court decision, but you're using your skills as a lawyer to find common ground and be strategic."
Cotterill took over as chief of staff in December following the resignation of Paul Okeson, a non-lawyer who left to take
another job. Cotterill describes his role in this job as providing counsel to the mayor and other administration officials.
His duties come on the heels of his job as corporation counsel, where from January 2008 to December 2009 he was able to eliminate
a backlog of about 200 discrimination claims and a severalyear-old backlog of civil-code violations, as well as reducing overhead
expenses to shift more funds to increase the number of cases prosecuted against those civil-code violators. He also spearheaded
Ballard's ethics-reform package that put higher ethical standards in place for officials, appointees, and employees.
For example, Cotterill said he coordinated the city's attorneys for the most efficiency. Prior to his arrival, every
public records request required a review from city legal. Roughly 90 percent of those didn't need a specific review and
could be handled administratively, Cotterill said, so he worked to de-lawyer that process.
Deputy chief counsel Samantha Karn succeeded Cotterill as corporation counsel and said her predecessor really paved the way
for a more efficient legal department for Indianapolis.
Prior to joining Ballard's team, Cotterill served since early 2005 as general counsel for the Indiana Office of Technology.
As part of that role, he managed the state government's official Web site at www. IN.govand that meant overseeing an annual
budget of $150 million. Before that, he was a part of Gov. Mitch Daniels transition team, drafting many of the governor's
initial executive orders and providing legal support on various topics.
The Indianapolis native graduated from Wabash College in 1999 and after graduating from law school in Bloomington in 2002
he became a Barnes & Thornburg associate handling commercial litigation defense.
Many of those same roles are what he's dealing with now as chief of staff, a position that doesn't require a law
degree, but Cotterill said it only benefits him in handling those responsibilities.
"In my current role, I'm a corporation lawyer serving in a government position that doesn't require one to be
a lawyer but can only be enhanced by having a lawyer in this role," he said.
He's using his legal experience and inhouse counsel background to navigate issues such as mass transit, hospital ownership,
private taxing, and government referendums and reorganization.
"The law for me is much of what government is about, and I love it," he said. "You bring a lawyer's training
to this job in looking at all of these topics. They all trigger legal issues, and it's about me knowing those legal issues
are there and trying to get the right people to understand what's going on at a deeper level."
Rafael Sanchez, a partner at Bingham McHale in Indianapolis who went to law school with Cotterill, said his close friend
and colleague had a lasting impact on the city's legal department and that continues in his current role.
"Government is a business and you have to treat it that way, and his in-house experience is pretty unique for a chief
of staff," Sanchez said. "He's seen the bad side of the law - the litigation side - and he's seen the consequences
of that angle and can now help make better legal decisions as counsel for Mayor Ballard. Putting all the litigation and business
sides together, that's a perfect combination for running a city. Chris is the calm within the storm and has a genuine
feel for getting the job done, in the legal world or not."
Noting that he's biased about his law school classmate, Sanchez wondered where Cotterill might end up after this - such
as a bid for mayor someday. Whatever happens, he sees a bright future for his colleague.
While Cotterill isn't yet planning what his future holds, he knows he's been lucky in his first decade since graduating
from college and law school. He doesn't expect that he'll ever return to a law firm environment simply because of
the executive management roles he's held and his passion for serving in government.
"I really didn't think I'd be in government this long, but it's been really rewarding. I'm a part of
making life better for people, and that's why I do it and enjoy it," Cotterill said. "You can make government
sing for you, and it's a great, great thing. Government can't solve everything, but with the problems that we should
approach, we can be very effective and that's the fun challenge."














Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.