ILNews

  • Home

Lawyers answer the call

IL Staff
May 23, 2012
Keywords
Bingham Greenebaum Doll, Law Firms
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
vol-roof-2-15col.jpg Bingham Greenebaum Doll attorney Tonya Vachirasomboon removes old roofing materials at the Concord Neighborhood Center in Indianapolis May 14. The law firm volunteered as part of the Central Indiana Service Challenge, which provides an opportunity for businesses to serve alongside others in their community at the charity of their choice. Bingham Greenebaum Doll attorney Mike Davis coordinated the team of attorneys that worked on the project. (Photo submitted)
vol-roof-1-15col.jpg Bingham Greenebaum Doll attorneys David Adams, Andy Gruber and Mike Davis (left to right) remove old roofing materials from the preschool modular at the Concord Neighborhood Center in Indianapolis May 14.
Seven of the firm’s attorneys volunteered for the project as part of the Central Indiana Service Challenge. (Photo submitted)
vol-kroger-gardis-gregory-cafouros-1col.jpg Gregory Cafouros, a partner with Kroger Gardis & Regas, paints at Wheeler Mission for Men on May 11. More than 15 attorneys and staff from the firm provided “A Day of Service” at Wheeler Mission as part of the firm’s celebration this year of 75 years practicing law in central Indiana. Volunteers served meals, did laundry, painted and performed other maintenance tasks.  (Photo submitted)









ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer

  1. Interesting that the new laws in criminal code all involve voter fraud

  2. I'm getting divorced and we have prenuptial and judge said it stands even though he made me sign it 2 days before wedding then I be c ame ill and left with nothing butbills

  3. No irony here, John. Conour’s clients are wise to him. Evidently you’ve missed discovery that disclosed Conour was aware he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, actually many cookie jars, but continued to spend any monies he secured on himself and his lifestyle. Your theory is idealistic and assumes Conour has the soul of a good attorney and therefore he would take care of his clients. Conour has no soul. He greedily took awarded settlements from his disabled clients and spent it on his own edacious desires. You are naïve to think if he kept working he would put his fees into a restitution fund. He is who he is and has proven he will use any means to cheat and manipulate those who trust him and the judicial system that is supposed to protect them. Sorry John, you don’t send the fox back into the hen house after he’s caught devouring the hens. Conour can’t be trusted. He has no more honor than that fox.

  4. The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.

  5. the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution

ADVERTISEMENT