ILNews

Lawyers balance public role as legislators

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share


In his 35 years as a lawyer-legislator, Sen. Richard Bray has thought about whether he should get involved in litigation because of his role as an elected state official. While he doesn't recall this ever affecting his involvement on a case or legislation before him, the veteran attorney from Martinsville, who practices with his son at The Bray Law Office, sees how it could present problems.

The state's government ethics guidelines and the Indiana Supreme Court's Rules of Professional Conduct vaguely address the issue, but there isn't clear guidance that dictates how a lawmaker is required to handle that particular situation whether they're an attorney or not.

Mostly, it boils down to each using his or her own judgment and balancing the public office with that of being an attorney, or a particular situation that could present a conflict of interest if it ever came before the General Assembly.

"I wouldn't take a case against the state, and might shy away from one that involves anything I would have to consider as a senator," he said. "... you always have to be alert and aware that there aren't actual conflicts or anything that could be perceived that way."

Professional Conduct Rule 8.4 commentary states, "Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of lawyers."

Analyzing possible conflicts

The National Center for State Courts doesn't specifically track legislators being sued or involved in litigation that could present a conflict. However, researchers there point to media reports and public court dockets to show that lawmakers in other states have also been plaintiffs or defendants while serving their constituents. Dozens of Hoosier legislators have had their names associated with cases through the years, whether it be as plaintiff, defendant, or amicus party, according to some of the attorney-legislators who've been in the General Assembly for years.

"When you run for public office, you expose yourself to potential litigation," said Rep. Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, a 23-year General Assembly veteran and former House speaker who's a partner at Kroger Gardis & Regas. "You do make yourself a target, whether you like it or not."

The first time Bosma faced a lawsuit as a legislator and not simply as an attorney came in 1986 during his first year. He recalled how someone sued every Indiana legislator for a share of the national debt. One he can't forget is a high-profile legislative prayer case from 2005, when some taxpayers sued the House of Representatives for its practice of opening sessions with a prayer and Bosma was named as defendant.

"That was the first time in my legislative or legal career that I found myself as a client, rather than a lawyer on a case," he said, noting his first task was to find a lawyer with expertise in that area of law. "Being sued gave me a little empathy for those involved in actions that aren't of their doing. ... Participating in that case as it worked through the legal system, and having the federal court judge comment about my being a lawyer and abiding by the professional and court rules ... that was an interesting experience."

As far as legislators getting involved in litigation as a third party, Bosma said he doesn't see any conflict with a legislator being associated with a case because it's a question of personal credibility and responsibility.

For example, he recalled a 1990s case where some legislators asked the courts to intervene in the legislative process to stop a statute from being enacted, but the appellate courts held that wasn't their business and it wouldn't intervene. He hasn't been involved in anything like that in part because of his scant experience in signing on to briefs as a legislator. There have been only four or five cases, such as one involving gun regulatory issues, in which Bosma recalled signing on as an amicus party during the past two decades.

"I'm asked to do that a lot but make sure any involvement is on an issue that's important and I fully agree with," he said. "I've turned down a lot of requests to add my name to cases because I'd be uncomfortable putting my name to an effort I didn't wholeheartedly ideologically agree with."

Because Indiana doesn't have legislative histories for enactments, Bosma said lawmakers are occasionally asked to serve as witnesses or sign on to briefs about the thought process in state or federal courts reviewing statues. He has testified in that manner before. As a general rule, the Indiana Attorney General is assigned the task of defending legislators when they're sued in their official capacity, including when subpoenas are served. Some hire outside counsel, as well.

The AG's office has been involved in about 20 cases during the past decade representing the General Assembly, House, Senate, or individual lawmakers, according to spokesman Bryan Corbin. Most were routine pro se prisoner cases naming the Department of Correction and state leaders, and some have been civil disputes where a legislator received a deposition subpoena as a nonparty. Because of legislative immunity, legislators normally can't be forced to testify about the legislative process, Corbin said.

As far as representing clients on issues that they might someday have to vote on in their elected roles, lawyer-lawmakers say that's why they are able to disclose any conflicts and abstain from voting if those issues arise.

"Is it appropriate for a senator or representative to engage in litigation as litigants or amicus, or any capacity, when it's a matter of public policy rather than one of individual redress?" asked Rep. Ralph Foley, R-Martinsville, who is an attorney at Foley & Pete. "I don't know. When you have representatives or senators signing up in that kind of litigation, it's often for a policy statement rather than normal bumps and grinds of ordinary life that can go to court between John Doe and Sam Smith. If you're making a policy statement about a particular philosophy on a public policy or legal issue, then that's an appropriate forum and remedy for expressing views."

Foley sees it almost as a priority for legislators to sometimes get involved in important litigation as third-party advocates on issues. In his years as a legislator, Foley said he's signed on to a handful of cases. He doesn't see any potential conflict when lawmakers are expressing their ideas on an issue using the legal system. That's been a tool used on the national level for years, in lining up different kinds of litigation to determine what kind of interpretation would result and what shifts in policy might be needed, he said.

A court in all fairness must look to the specific issues in the case and not count the names or prioritize them, Foley said.

"Litigation is one mechanism that civilized people use to refine their view of policy issues without resorting to guns, knives, and fights in the street," he said. "Trial by combat is more refined when we take it into a courtroom and decide how the law applies as it's written. We write it, but we have to live by it just like everyone else."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. State Farm is sad and filled with woe Edward Rust is no longer CEO He had knowledge, but wasn’t in the know The Board said it was time for him to go All American Girl starred Margaret Cho The Miami Heat coach is nicknamed Spo I hate to paddle but don’t like to row Edward Rust is no longer CEO The Board said it was time for him to go The word souffler is French for blow I love the rain but dislike the snow Ten tosses for a nickel or a penny a throw State Farm is sad and filled with woe Edward Rust is no longer CEO Bambi’s mom was a fawn who became a doe You can’t line up if you don’t get in a row My car isn’t running, “Give me a tow” He had knowledge but wasn’t in the know The Board said it was time for him to go Plant a seed and water it to make it grow Phases of the tide are ebb and flow If you head isn’t hairy you don’t have a fro You can buff your bald head to make it glow State Farm is sad and filled with woe Edward Rust is no longer CEO I like Mike Tyson more than Riddick Bowe A mug of coffee is a cup of joe Call me brother, don’t call me bro When I sing scat I sound like Al Jarreau State Farm is sad and filled with woe The Board said it was time for him to go A former Tigers pitcher was Lerrin LaGrow Ursula Andress was a Bond girl in Dr. No Brian Benben is married to Madeline Stowe Betsy Ross couldn’t knit but she sure could sew He had knowledge but wasn’t in the know Edward Rust is no longer CEO Grand Funk toured with David Allan Coe I said to Shoeless Joe, “Say it ain’t so” Brandon Lee died during the filming of The Crow In 1992 I didn’t vote for Ross Perot State Farm is sad and filled with woe The Board said it was time for him to go A hare is fast and a tortoise is slow The overhead compartment is for luggage to stow Beware from above but look out below I’m gaining momentum, I’ve got big mo He had knowledge but wasn’t in the know Edward Rust is no longer CEO I’ve travelled far but have miles to go My insurance company thinks I’m their ho I’m not their friend but I am their foe Robin Hood had arrows, a quiver and a bow State Farm has a lame duck CEO He had knowledge, but wasn’t in the know The Board said it was time for him to go State Farm is sad and filled with woe

  2. The ADA acts as a tax upon all for the benefit of a few. And, most importantly, the many have no individual say in whether they pay the tax. Those with handicaps suffered in military service should get a pass, but those who are handicapped by accident or birth do NOT deserve that pass. The drivel about "equal access" is spurious because the handicapped HAVE equal access, they just can't effectively use it. That is their problem, not society's. The burden to remediate should be that of those who seek the benefit of some social, constructional, or dimensional change, NOT society generally. Everybody wants to socialize the costs and concentrate the benefits of government intrusion so that they benefit and largely avoid the costs. This simply maintains the constant push to the slop trough, and explains, in part, why the nation is 20 trillion dollars in the hole.

  3. Hey 2 psychs is never enough, since it is statistically unlikely that three will ever agree on anything! New study admits this pseudo science is about as scientifically valid as astrology ... done by via fortune cookie ....John Ioannidis, professor of health research and policy at Stanford University, said the study was impressive and that its results had been eagerly awaited by the scientific community. “Sadly, the picture it paints - a 64% failure rate even among papers published in the best journals in the field - is not very nice about the current status of psychological science in general, and for fields like social psychology it is just devastating,” he said. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/27/study-delivers-bleak-verdict-on-validity-of-psychology-experiment-results

  4. Indianapolis Bar Association President John Trimble and I are on the same page, but it is a very large page with plenty of room for others to join us. As my final Res Gestae article will express in more detail in a few days, the Great Recession hastened a fundamental and permanent sea change for the global legal service profession. Every state bar is facing the same existential questions that thrust the medical profession into national healthcare reform debates. The bench, bar, and law schools must comprehensively reconsider how we define the practice of law and what it means to access justice. If the three principals of the legal service profession do not recast the vision of their roles and responsibilities soon, the marketplace will dictate those roles and responsibilities without regard for the public interests that the legal profession professes to serve.

  5. I have met some highly placed bureaucrats who vehemently disagree, Mr. Smith. This is not your father's time in America. Some ideas are just too politically incorrect too allow spoken, says those who watch over us for the good of their concept of order.

ADVERTISEMENT