ILNews

Lawyers balance public role as legislators

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share


In his 35 years as a lawyer-legislator, Sen. Richard Bray has thought about whether he should get involved in litigation because of his role as an elected state official. While he doesn't recall this ever affecting his involvement on a case or legislation before him, the veteran attorney from Martinsville, who practices with his son at The Bray Law Office, sees how it could present problems.

The state's government ethics guidelines and the Indiana Supreme Court's Rules of Professional Conduct vaguely address the issue, but there isn't clear guidance that dictates how a lawmaker is required to handle that particular situation whether they're an attorney or not.

Mostly, it boils down to each using his or her own judgment and balancing the public office with that of being an attorney, or a particular situation that could present a conflict of interest if it ever came before the General Assembly.

"I wouldn't take a case against the state, and might shy away from one that involves anything I would have to consider as a senator," he said. "... you always have to be alert and aware that there aren't actual conflicts or anything that could be perceived that way."

Professional Conduct Rule 8.4 commentary states, "Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of lawyers."

Analyzing possible conflicts

The National Center for State Courts doesn't specifically track legislators being sued or involved in litigation that could present a conflict. However, researchers there point to media reports and public court dockets to show that lawmakers in other states have also been plaintiffs or defendants while serving their constituents. Dozens of Hoosier legislators have had their names associated with cases through the years, whether it be as plaintiff, defendant, or amicus party, according to some of the attorney-legislators who've been in the General Assembly for years.

"When you run for public office, you expose yourself to potential litigation," said Rep. Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, a 23-year General Assembly veteran and former House speaker who's a partner at Kroger Gardis & Regas. "You do make yourself a target, whether you like it or not."

The first time Bosma faced a lawsuit as a legislator and not simply as an attorney came in 1986 during his first year. He recalled how someone sued every Indiana legislator for a share of the national debt. One he can't forget is a high-profile legislative prayer case from 2005, when some taxpayers sued the House of Representatives for its practice of opening sessions with a prayer and Bosma was named as defendant.

"That was the first time in my legislative or legal career that I found myself as a client, rather than a lawyer on a case," he said, noting his first task was to find a lawyer with expertise in that area of law. "Being sued gave me a little empathy for those involved in actions that aren't of their doing. ... Participating in that case as it worked through the legal system, and having the federal court judge comment about my being a lawyer and abiding by the professional and court rules ... that was an interesting experience."

As far as legislators getting involved in litigation as a third party, Bosma said he doesn't see any conflict with a legislator being associated with a case because it's a question of personal credibility and responsibility.

For example, he recalled a 1990s case where some legislators asked the courts to intervene in the legislative process to stop a statute from being enacted, but the appellate courts held that wasn't their business and it wouldn't intervene. He hasn't been involved in anything like that in part because of his scant experience in signing on to briefs as a legislator. There have been only four or five cases, such as one involving gun regulatory issues, in which Bosma recalled signing on as an amicus party during the past two decades.

"I'm asked to do that a lot but make sure any involvement is on an issue that's important and I fully agree with," he said. "I've turned down a lot of requests to add my name to cases because I'd be uncomfortable putting my name to an effort I didn't wholeheartedly ideologically agree with."

Because Indiana doesn't have legislative histories for enactments, Bosma said lawmakers are occasionally asked to serve as witnesses or sign on to briefs about the thought process in state or federal courts reviewing statues. He has testified in that manner before. As a general rule, the Indiana Attorney General is assigned the task of defending legislators when they're sued in their official capacity, including when subpoenas are served. Some hire outside counsel, as well.

The AG's office has been involved in about 20 cases during the past decade representing the General Assembly, House, Senate, or individual lawmakers, according to spokesman Bryan Corbin. Most were routine pro se prisoner cases naming the Department of Correction and state leaders, and some have been civil disputes where a legislator received a deposition subpoena as a nonparty. Because of legislative immunity, legislators normally can't be forced to testify about the legislative process, Corbin said.

As far as representing clients on issues that they might someday have to vote on in their elected roles, lawyer-lawmakers say that's why they are able to disclose any conflicts and abstain from voting if those issues arise.

"Is it appropriate for a senator or representative to engage in litigation as litigants or amicus, or any capacity, when it's a matter of public policy rather than one of individual redress?" asked Rep. Ralph Foley, R-Martinsville, who is an attorney at Foley & Pete. "I don't know. When you have representatives or senators signing up in that kind of litigation, it's often for a policy statement rather than normal bumps and grinds of ordinary life that can go to court between John Doe and Sam Smith. If you're making a policy statement about a particular philosophy on a public policy or legal issue, then that's an appropriate forum and remedy for expressing views."

Foley sees it almost as a priority for legislators to sometimes get involved in important litigation as third-party advocates on issues. In his years as a legislator, Foley said he's signed on to a handful of cases. He doesn't see any potential conflict when lawmakers are expressing their ideas on an issue using the legal system. That's been a tool used on the national level for years, in lining up different kinds of litigation to determine what kind of interpretation would result and what shifts in policy might be needed, he said.

A court in all fairness must look to the specific issues in the case and not count the names or prioritize them, Foley said.

"Litigation is one mechanism that civilized people use to refine their view of policy issues without resorting to guns, knives, and fights in the street," he said. "Trial by combat is more refined when we take it into a courtroom and decide how the law applies as it's written. We write it, but we have to live by it just like everyone else."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Been there 4 months with 1 paycheck what can i do

  2. our hoa has not communicated any thing that takes place in their "executive meetings" not executive session. They make decisions in these meetings, do not have an agenda, do not notify association memebers and do not keep general meetings minutes. They do not communicate info of any kind to the member, except annual meeting, nobody attends or votes because they think the board is self serving. They keep a deposit fee from club house rental for inspection after someone uses it, there is no inspection I know becausee I rented it, they did not disclose to members that board memebers would be keeping this money, I know it is only 10 dollars but still it is not their money, they hire from within the board for paid positions, no advertising and no request for bids from anyone else, I atteended last annual meeting, went into executive session to elect officers in that session the president brought up the motion to give the secretary a raise of course they all agreed they hired her in, then the minutes stated that a diffeerent board member motioned to give this raise. This board is very clickish and has done things anyway they pleased for over 5 years, what recourse to members have to make changes in the boards conduct

  3. Where may I find an attorney working Pro Bono? Many issues with divorce, my Disability, distribution of IRA's, property, money's and pressured into agreement by my attorney. Leaving me far less than 5% of all after 15 years of marriage. No money to appeal, disabled living on disability income. Attorney's decision brought forward to judge, no evidence ever to finalize divorce. Just 2 weeks ago. Please help.

  4. For the record no one could answer the equal protection / substantive due process challenge I issued in the first post below. The lawless and accountable only to power bureaucrats never did either. All who interface with the Indiana law examiners or JLAP be warned.

  5. Hi there I really need help with getting my old divorce case back into court - I am still paying support on a 24 year old who has not been in school since age 16 - now living independent. My visitation with my 14 year old has never been modified; however, when convenient for her I can have him... I am paying past balance from over due support, yet earn several thousand dollars less. I would contact my original attorney but he basically molest me multiple times in Indy when I would visit.. Todd Woodmansee - I had just came out and had know idea what to do... I have heard he no longer practices. Please help1

ADVERTISEMENT