ILNews

Lawyers want to settle tainted medication suit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

The product-liability litigation arising from the outbreak of fungal meningitis across the United States that infected nearly 100 Hoosiers has become mixed with a bankruptcy, a possible criminal investigation and a desire by plaintiff attorneys to reach a settlement soon so their clients can get restitution.

On Nov. 5, the plaintiffs’ attorneys filed a master complaint in U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts which listed the unaffiliated defendants, including the specific clinics where tainted steroids were administered.

The individual product-liability claims for personal injury and wrongful death filed across the United States were consolidated into a multidistrict litigation in February 2013 for pretrial proceedings. If the parties do not agree on settlement terms, the cases will return for trial to the federal courts in each state where a claim was filed.

Price Waicukauski & Riley LLC in Indianapolis and Foley & Small in South Bend are co-chairs of the multidistrict litigation in Indiana.

Neither the New England Compounding Center, which has been identified as the source of the tainted methylprednisolone acetate, nor its owners were listed as defendants in the master complaint. The Massachusetts-based company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in December 2012 and all liability claims against them are currently being handled through the bankruptcy court.

Currently, the plaintiffs’ steering committee is trying to get the clinics to agree to mediation, according to Jamie Kendall, attorney at Price Waicukauski & Riley. The hope is the master complaint naming the clinics will spur the defendants to the negotiation table.

“We want to get this litigation wrapped up as quickly as possible,” Kendall said, explaining since bankruptcy indicates NECC has few resources, the attorneys want to have the available money go to their clients. “Everyone involved wants to get this done as soon as possible so no more funds go to handling the litigation.”

Clients have suffered since they were infected with fungal meningitis, Kendall said. They were miserably sick which led to “outrageous medical bills” and lost income. One client has to learn to walk again after being in a coma.

These people, Kendall said, walked into a doctor’s office with a backache and their whole lives changed.

At the clinics

fungal-factbox.gifThe first case of fungal meningitis reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention came from Tennessee in September 2012. There, a patient had developed the infection after being injected with an epidural steroid.

Fungal meningitis infects the protective membranes covering the brain and spinal cord. Usually the fungus is spread through the blood of the spinal cord. The CDC stated that many patients with fungal meningitis experience only mild symptoms such as a headache, fever and nausea.

Quickly the outbreak spread, eventually engulfing 20 states and putting an estimated 13,500 patients at risk, according to the CDC. To date, 751 patients in the United States have contracted fungal meningitis and 64 have died as a result.

Indiana has the third-highest number of cases and deaths at 93 and 11, respectively. Michigan leads with 264 cases and 19 deaths while Tennessee is second with 153 cases and 16 deaths.

Six clinics in the Hoosier state have been identified by the CDC as having received the recalled lots of the contaminated medicine.

OSMC Outpatient Surgery Center in Elkhart logged the largest use of the product of any health care facility in Indiana, according to Foley & Small attorney Doug Small. The attorney identified in court documents as representing OSMC in the litigation did not respond to a phone call seeking comment.

According to Small, the plaintiffs are arguing the clinics should have known there were problems at the compounding pharmacy because of the bulk shipments they were receiving.

Typically, compounding pharmacies prepare the medication especially for individual patients. OSMC and The South Bend Clinic, Small said, received 100 vials of the steroid, far more than needed for the number of patients they had listed on the order form. Patients are recommended to receive no more than two or three epidural injections each year.

There is no evidence, Small said, that anyone at the clinics believed they had a badly contaminated product. Also, there’s no contention of malpractice in administering the shots.

Yet, the clinics should have suspected that something was wrong because they were getting far more product than they were able to use, Small continued. The contention is the clinics should have known NECC was not operating as a legitimate compounding pharmacy and done their due diligence.

Large amounts of the steroid were shipped to Indiana and used, which does raise eyebrows, Kendall said. But there is no explanation as to why so much of the product came here.

The master complaint’s allegations against the clinics include negligence, battery, failure to warn and wrongful death.

Contamination found

Ordinarily, pharmaceutical suits revolve around allegations that the manufacturer failed to provide adequate warnings of side effects. The question is whether the company knew or should have known the drug would cause health problems.

Andy Campbell, partner at Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, has defended drug companies in litigation. These cases involving an allegation of an inadequate warning can be complex and bring a parade of experts into the courtroom to prove – and disprove – causation.

The fungal meningitis complaint is different because the charge is the medication was contaminated. This may affect how the case is litigated, Campbell said, since the dispute could be more about a manufacturer-defect issue rather than a failure to warn.

An investigation of NECC by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health found visible contaminants in the drug products and noted the clean rooms were not appropriately sealed to prevent contaminants from infiltrating.

NECC surrendered its pharmacy license and recalled its products in October 2012.

The master complaint noted the U.S. Department of Justice and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts are pursuing criminal investigations. Kendall said the FBI has recently asked to talk with all her plaintiffs.

In addition to restitution for her clients, Kendall would like the litigation to bring better regulation and oversight to compounding pharmacies. The master complaint referred to reports dating back to 2002 from the CDC and the FDA raising concerns about contamination and risks.

Despite their stories of struggles with fungal meningitis, plaintiffs would not be assured success if these cases do go to trial. The knee-jerk reaction is that juries would be more sympathetic to the injured party than to the pharmaceutical company, Campbell said, but that is not always so.

“I think juries, at least in my experience, are very thoughtful in these cases,” Campbell said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Paid for tainted shot
    I received one of the tainted steroid shots from OSMC in Elkhart. I had flu like symptoms, didn't suffer horribly like others did. I found it insulting that OSMC didn't refund those who got the NECC tainted steroid for the procedure or the cost of the medicine. That would admit wrongdoing on their part, which I'm sure they would like to avoid until litigation is over. Unfortunate, their are a lot of good people who work there, but someone really dropped the ball on quality control and I haven't heard of any losing their job over this.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Living in South Bend, I travel to Michigan a lot. Virtually every gas station sells cold beer there. Many sell the hard stuff too. Doesn't seem to be a big deal there.

  2. Mr. Ricker, how foolish of you to think that by complying with the law you would be ok. Don't you know that Indiana is a state that welcomes monopolies, and that Indiana's legislature is the one entity in this state that believes monopolistic practices (such as those engaged in by Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers) make Indiana a "business-friendly" state? How can you not see this????

  3. Actually, and most strikingly, the ruling failed to address the central issue to the whole case: Namely, Black Knight/LPS, who was NEVER a party to the State court litigation, and who is under a 2013 consent judgment in Indiana (where it has stipulated to the forgery of loan documents, the ones specifically at issue in my case)never disclosed itself in State court or remediated the forged loan documents as was REQUIRED of them by the CJ. In essence, what the court is willfully ignoring, is that it is setting a precedent that the supplier of a defective product, one whom is under a consent judgment stipulating to such, and under obligation to remediate said defective product, can: 1.) Ignore the CJ 2.) Allow counsel to commit fraud on the state court 3.) Then try to hide behind Rooker Feldman doctrine as a bar to being held culpable in federal court. The problem here is the court is in direct conflict with its own ruling(s) in Johnson v. Pushpin Holdings & Iqbal- 780 F.3d 728, at 730 “What Johnson adds - what the defendants in this suit have failed to appreciate—is that federal courts retain jurisdiction to award damages for fraud that imposes extrajudicial injury. The Supreme Court drew that very line in Exxon Mobil ... Iqbal alleges that the defendants conducted a racketeering enterprise that predates the state court’s judgments ...but Exxon Mobil shows that the Rooker Feldman doctrine asks what injury the plaintiff asks the federal court to redress, not whether the injury is “intertwined” with something else …Because Iqbal seeks damages for activity that (he alleges) predates the state litigation and caused injury independently of it, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not block this suit. It must be reinstated.” So, as I already noted to others, I now have the chance to bring my case to SCOTUS; the ruling by Wood & Posner is flawed on numerous levels,BUT most troubling is the fact that the authors KNOW it's a flawed ruling and choose to ignore the flaws for one simple reason: The courts have decided to agree with former AG Eric Holder that national banks "Are too big to fail" and must win at any cost-even that of due process, case precedent, & the truth....Let's see if SCOTUS wants a bite at the apple.

  4. I am in NJ & just found out that there is a judgment against me in an action by Driver's Solutions LLC in IN. I was never served with any Court pleadings, etc. and the only thing that I can find out is that they were using an old Staten Island NY address for me. I have been in NJ for over 20 years and cannot get any response from Drivers Solutions in IN. They have a different lawyer now. I need to get this vacated or stopped - it is now almost double & at 18%. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

  5. I am in NJ & just found out that there is a judgment against me in an action by Driver's Solutions LLC in IN. I was never served with any Court pleadings, etc. and the only thing that I can find out is that they were using an old Staten Island NY address for me. I have been in NJ for over 20 years and cannot get any response from Drivers Solutions in IN. They have a different lawyer now. I need to get this vacated or stopped - it is now almost double & at 18%. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

ADVERTISEMENT