ILNews

Leadership in Law 2012: Andrew L. Campbell

Associate, Faegre Baker Daniels, Indianapolis Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

April 25, 2012
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Andrew Campbell (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Andrew Campbell is an accomplished litigator in product liability and commercial matters, but his contributions extend beyond his litigation skills and work ethic. He has led and advanced pro bono services in Indianapolis and has been recognized for his commitment to serving those in need.

In 2012, I’d like to
continue to build a more independent practice.

The best advice I could give a recent law school graduate is
be imaginative about your employment prospects, the legal field is very broad.

My long-term career goal is
to be constantly challenged.

If I weren’t an attorney, I’d be
a (very) starving musician.

My escape from work is
my wife and best friend, Emily.

The three words that best describe me are
organized, responsive and committed.

My mentor has taught me
look for creative solutions; cooperation and compromise often lead to better solutions for your clients.

In the movie about my life,
Judge Reinhold – because he is my doppelganger, and I’m a bit of a close talker – would play me.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT