(Photo submitted by Plews Shadley Racher & Braun)
Angela Green, who focuses her practice on complex litigation, legislative and regulatory issues in environmental law, regularly
works with fellow attorneys and clients on cases that require her to shift seamlessly from one forum to another. Her versatility
and broad skill set have allowed her to become a highly valued member of her firm.
In 2012, I’d like to
master the work/life balance.
The best advice I could give a recent law school graduate is
to find a good mentor.
The three words that best describe me are
strong, versatile and inquisitive.
My long-term career goal is
to hone my litigation skills and become a more effective advocate.
If I weren’t an attorney, I’d be
an archaeologist or historian. I’m endlessly fascinated by human nature and the evolution of civilization.
My escape from work is
Virginia civil war battlefields.
My mentor has taught me
that principles matter.
In the movie about my life,
someone classically trained in the arts of both comedy and drama would play me.
on Facebook & Twitter
Back to Top
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.