ILNews

Leadership in Law 2012: Angela M. Green

Associate, Plews Shadley Racher & Braun, Indianapolis Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

April 25, 2012
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Angela Green (Photo submitted by Plews Shadley Racher & Braun)

Angela Green, who focuses her practice on complex litigation, legislative and regulatory issues in environmental law, regularly works with fellow attorneys and clients on cases that require her to shift seamlessly from one forum to another. Her versatility and broad skill set have allowed her to become a highly valued member of her firm.

In 2012, I’d like to
master the work/life balance.

The best advice I could give a recent law school graduate is
to find a good mentor.

The three words that best describe me are
strong, versatile and inquisitive.

My long-term career goal is
to hone my litigation skills and become a more effective advocate.

If I weren’t an attorney, I’d be
an archaeologist or historian. I’m endlessly fascinated by human nature and the evolution of civilization.

My escape from work is
Virginia civil war battlefields.

My mentor has taught me
that principles matter.

In the movie about my life,
someone classically trained in the arts of both comedy and drama would play me.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT