ILNews

Leadership in Law 2012: Anna Mandula

Associate, Johnson & Bell, Crown Point Valparaiso University Law School

April 25, 2012
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Anna Mandula (IL Photo/ Steve Linsenmayer)

Anna Mandula, a general negligence and health care attorney, has shown herself in the community to be an honorable and excellent example of what a young lawyer should be: she has class, intelligence, ethics, humility and integrity. She participates in Share the Love to support women in the community and supports The Cancer Resource Centre. Anna is always willing to lend a hand to fellow attorneys.

In 2012, I’d like to
continue to gain knowledge and experience to build my career and be better able to serve clients and positively impact the community at large.

The best advice I could give a recent law school graduate is
to remember that what you lack in experience, make up for in preparation.

The three words that best describe me are
hardworking, determined and honest.

My long-term career goal is
to make partner at my firm.

If I weren’t an attorney, I’d be
an interior designer and decorator.

My escape from work is
spending as much time as possible with my family and friends and redecorating my house (and my parents’ house, too).

My mentor has taught me
(and continues to teach me) what being an attorney is all about; to not be afraid to admit when you don’t know something; and the value of extensive preparation.

In the movie about my life,
Rachel Weisz would play me.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. "Am I bugging you? I don't mean to bug ya." If what I wrote below is too much social philosophy for Indiana attorneys, just take ten this vacay to watch The Lego Movie with kiddies and sing along where appropriate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etzMjoH0rJw

  2. I've got some free speech to share here about who is at work via the cat's paw of the ACLU stamping out Christian observances.... 2 Thessalonians chap 2: "And we also thank God continually because, when you received the word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as a human word, but as it actually is, the word of God, which is indeed at work in you who believe. For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those churches suffered from the Jews who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to everyone in their effort to keep us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved. In this way they always heap up their sins to the limit. The wrath of God has come upon them at last."

  3. Did someone not tell people who have access to the Chevy Volts that it has a gas engine and will run just like a normal car? The batteries give the Volt approximately a 40 mile range, but after that the gas engine will propel the vehicle either directly through the transmission like any other car, or gas engine recharges the batteries depending on the conditions.

  4. Catholic, Lutheran, even the Baptists nuzzling the wolf! http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-documents-reveal-obama-hhs-paid-baptist-children-family-services-182129786-four-months-housing-illegal-alien-children/ YET where is the Progressivist outcry? Silent. I wonder why?

  5. Thank you, Honorable Ladies, and thank you, TIL, for this interesting interview. The most interesting question was the last one, which drew the least response. Could it be that NFP stamps are a threat to the very foundation of our common law American legal tradition, a throwback to the continental system that facilitated differing standards of justice? A throwback to Star Chamber’s protection of the landed gentry? If TIL ever again interviews this same panel, I would recommend inviting one known for voicing socio-legal dissent for the masses, maybe Welch, maybe Ogden, maybe our own John Smith? As demographics shift and our social cohesion precipitously drops, a consistent judicial core will become more and more important so that Justice and Equal Protection and Due Process are yet guiding stars. If those stars fall from our collective social horizon (and can they be seen even now through the haze of NFP opinions?) then what glue other than more NFP decisions and TRO’s and executive orders -- all backed by more and more lethally armed praetorians – will prop up our government institutions? And if and when we do arrive at such an end … will any then dare call that tyranny? Or will the cost of such dissent be too high to justify?

ADVERTISEMENT