ILNews

Leadership in Law 2012: Stephen C. Unger

Partner, Bose McKinney & Evans, Indianapolis Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

April 25, 2012
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Steve Unger (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Stephen Unger’s energy and knowledge make him an invaluable team member for clients and colleagues, who significantly value his opinions and advice. His motivation for community involvement stems from his passion in the legal profession, in the communities where he lives and works, and in his faith.

The best advice I could give a recent law school graduate is
become an expert on each new task, and be more prepared than everyone else.

In 2012, I’d like to
spend more time with my family.

The three words that best describe me are
realistic, affable and economical.

My long-term career goal is
simply to be respected as someone who does quality work and provides good legal advice.   

My escape from work is
my kids.

My mentor has taught me
patience. My professional career is not a sprint.  And if you do good work, the rest will take care of itself.    

If I weren’t an attorney, I
probably would have followed my dad into coaching basketball.

In the movie about my life,
my wife says Matt Damon would play me. I’ll go along with that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT