ILNews

Leadership in Law 2012: Stephen E. Reynolds

Associate, Ice Miller, Indianapolis Indiana University Maurer School of Law

April 25, 2012
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Stephen Reynolds (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Litigator Stephen Reynolds is respected as a practitioner by his colleagues, clients and other attorneys. He is known for having a quick mind and tireless work ethic, and for always conducting himself with professionalism and civility.

In 2012, I’d like to
continue to grow my practice in products liability litigation, trade secrets litigation, municipal and government entity litigation, and electronic discovery coordination and management.

The best advice I could give a recent law school graduate is
work with people you like.

The three words that best describe me are
hardworking, fun and energetic.

My long-term career goal is
to continue to do interesting, challenging legal work.

If I weren’t an attorney, I’d be
a software developer.

My escape from work is
my wife, Phyllisia Gant-Reynolds, and our new baby.

My mentor has taught me
if I had to pick one lesson that my attorney mentors have repeatedly stressed, it is the importance of attention to details.

In the movie about my life,
Derek Luke would play me.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  2. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

  3. wow is this a bunch of bs! i know the facts!

  4. MCBA .... time for a new release about your entire membership (or is it just the alter ego) being "saddened and disappointed" in the failure to lynch a police officer protecting himself in the line of duty. But this time against Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Investigation: "WASHINGTON — Justice Department lawyers will recommend that no civil rights charges be brought against the police officer who fatally shot an unarmed teenager in Ferguson, Mo., after an F.B.I. investigation found no evidence to support charges, law enforcement officials said Wednesday." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/22/us/justice-department-ferguson-civil-rights-darren-wilson.html?ref=us&_r=0

  5. Dr wail asfour lives 3 hours from the hospital,where if he gets an emergency at least he needs three hours,while even if he is on call he should be in a location where it gives him max 10 minutes to be beside the patient,they get paid double on their on call days ,where look how they handle it,so if the death of the patient occurs on weekend and these doctors still repeat same pattern such issue should be raised,they should be closer to the patient.on other hand if all the death occured on the absence of the Dr and the nurses handle it,the nurses should get trained how to function appearntly they not that good,if the Dr lives 3 hours far from the hospital on his call days he should sleep in the hospital

ADVERTISEMENT