ILNews

Leadership in Law 2014: John Z. Huang

Associate, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Indianapolis • Notre Dame Law School, 2007

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 

15col-Huang.jpg John Z. Huang (IL Photo/ Eric Learned)

John Z. Huang joined Bose McKinney & Evans LLP in 2013 as a civil litigator after working in the public and private sector as a lawyer and educator. He began his legal career as a law clerk for Indiana Justice Frank Sullivan, who cites among John’s professional attributes his intelligence, warm personality and ethical standards. Colleagues describe him as a values-driven leader.

John believes every child deserves an excellent education, and he continues to commit significant personal and professional energies to achieving that goal.

Before becoming a law clerk on the Indiana Supreme Court, you had no prior relationship to Indianapolis. What made you stay?

After my clerkship ended in 2009, I was grateful to gain significant hands-on experience handling a docket of 30 civil cases at one time as assistant corporation counsel with the City of Indianapolis Corporation Counsel. I have been fortunate to have been involved in significant cases with the city, at the Department of Education, and now at Bose McKinney & Evans. I have enjoyed the collegiality and the accessibility of the legal community in Indianapolis.

What was the worst or most memorable job you had prior to becoming an attorney?

My most memorable job was serving as a third grade teacher in inner-city Los Angeles for two years as a Teach for America corps member. It was the toughest two years of my professional career, but I learned so much about working hard, overcoming challenges, perseverance and having faith.

You also have worked for the Indiana Department of Education and Lighthouse Academies, a charter school management organization. Why have you chosen education as a place to put your efforts?

I am interested in education because I love working with and teaching children and young adults, and I believe that a well-rounded, balanced education empowers all Americans to achieve their God-given potential and strengthens who we are as a people.

What is the most important lesson you learned from your mentor?

Legal writing should be succinct and easy enough for a non-lawyer to understand.

What’s something about you not many people know?

I am a fierce competitor when it comes to sports, especially basketball.

Why practice in the area of law that you do?

I practice general civil litigation because of the variety of interesting legal issues that I get to learn about and think about on a daily basis, because it allows me to utilize my interest and strength in legal research and writing, and because of the profound positive impact that civil litigation can have on individuals and on society as a whole.     

Who is your favorite fictional lawyer?

My favorite fictional lawyer is Atticus Finch because of his moral courage, integrity, and his steadfast belief that all men should be treated equally under the law.  

What civic cause is the most important to you?

For me, the most important civic cause is providing access to a quality education for all children here in Indianapolis, in Indiana and across the country.  I believe in empowering all sectors of society to contribute to this cause.  

If you couldn’t be a lawyer, what would you do for a living?

If I couldn’t be lawyer, I would probably be a combination of a Christian counselor, a youth basketball coach, and an adjunct law professor and legal writer/contributor to various media outlets.  

What are some tips for achieving a work/life balance?

Try to leave work at a designated time every day so that you set aside a certain amount of time each day to spend with family; spend the weekend doing things you enjoy; stay physically active.

Why do you think people often have negative stereotypes about lawyers?

I believe some of it has to do with the way lawyers are portrayed and glorified in the popular media.  In addition, having a law degree does confer a certain amount of status, power and influence, and we as lawyers have to be constantly aware of exercising our influence wisely and ethically.  

If you could meet and spend the day with one lawyer from history, who would it be and why?

I would love to spend one day with Abraham Lincoln, and ask him how his legal career helped him become the courageous and wise leader he was, and how it helped him navigate the Civil War and make so many tough decisions in such a turbulent time in our country’s history.   

Is there a moment in your career you wish you could do over?

As a summer intern in law school, I turned down an assignment from the executive director of the organization I was interning for because I didn’t have an interest in the topic. Bad mistake! I quickly learned my lesson.   

What class do you wish you could have skipped in law school?

Federal Income Tax, which was a graduation requirement at the time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT