ILNews

Leadership in Law 2014: John Z. Huang

Associate, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Indianapolis • Notre Dame Law School, 2007

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 

15col-Huang.jpg John Z. Huang (IL Photo/ Eric Learned)

John Z. Huang joined Bose McKinney & Evans LLP in 2013 as a civil litigator after working in the public and private sector as a lawyer and educator. He began his legal career as a law clerk for Indiana Justice Frank Sullivan, who cites among John’s professional attributes his intelligence, warm personality and ethical standards. Colleagues describe him as a values-driven leader.

John believes every child deserves an excellent education, and he continues to commit significant personal and professional energies to achieving that goal.

Before becoming a law clerk on the Indiana Supreme Court, you had no prior relationship to Indianapolis. What made you stay?

After my clerkship ended in 2009, I was grateful to gain significant hands-on experience handling a docket of 30 civil cases at one time as assistant corporation counsel with the City of Indianapolis Corporation Counsel. I have been fortunate to have been involved in significant cases with the city, at the Department of Education, and now at Bose McKinney & Evans. I have enjoyed the collegiality and the accessibility of the legal community in Indianapolis.

What was the worst or most memorable job you had prior to becoming an attorney?

My most memorable job was serving as a third grade teacher in inner-city Los Angeles for two years as a Teach for America corps member. It was the toughest two years of my professional career, but I learned so much about working hard, overcoming challenges, perseverance and having faith.

You also have worked for the Indiana Department of Education and Lighthouse Academies, a charter school management organization. Why have you chosen education as a place to put your efforts?

I am interested in education because I love working with and teaching children and young adults, and I believe that a well-rounded, balanced education empowers all Americans to achieve their God-given potential and strengthens who we are as a people.

What is the most important lesson you learned from your mentor?

Legal writing should be succinct and easy enough for a non-lawyer to understand.

What’s something about you not many people know?

I am a fierce competitor when it comes to sports, especially basketball.

Why practice in the area of law that you do?

I practice general civil litigation because of the variety of interesting legal issues that I get to learn about and think about on a daily basis, because it allows me to utilize my interest and strength in legal research and writing, and because of the profound positive impact that civil litigation can have on individuals and on society as a whole.     

Who is your favorite fictional lawyer?

My favorite fictional lawyer is Atticus Finch because of his moral courage, integrity, and his steadfast belief that all men should be treated equally under the law.  

What civic cause is the most important to you?

For me, the most important civic cause is providing access to a quality education for all children here in Indianapolis, in Indiana and across the country.  I believe in empowering all sectors of society to contribute to this cause.  

If you couldn’t be a lawyer, what would you do for a living?

If I couldn’t be lawyer, I would probably be a combination of a Christian counselor, a youth basketball coach, and an adjunct law professor and legal writer/contributor to various media outlets.  

What are some tips for achieving a work/life balance?

Try to leave work at a designated time every day so that you set aside a certain amount of time each day to spend with family; spend the weekend doing things you enjoy; stay physically active.

Why do you think people often have negative stereotypes about lawyers?

I believe some of it has to do with the way lawyers are portrayed and glorified in the popular media.  In addition, having a law degree does confer a certain amount of status, power and influence, and we as lawyers have to be constantly aware of exercising our influence wisely and ethically.  

If you could meet and spend the day with one lawyer from history, who would it be and why?

I would love to spend one day with Abraham Lincoln, and ask him how his legal career helped him become the courageous and wise leader he was, and how it helped him navigate the Civil War and make so many tough decisions in such a turbulent time in our country’s history.   

Is there a moment in your career you wish you could do over?

As a summer intern in law school, I turned down an assignment from the executive director of the organization I was interning for because I didn’t have an interest in the topic. Bad mistake! I quickly learned my lesson.   

What class do you wish you could have skipped in law school?

Federal Income Tax, which was a graduation requirement at the time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Have been seeing this wonderful physician for a few years and was one of his patients who told him about what we were being told at CVS. Multiple ones. This was a witch hunt and they shold be ashamed of how patients were treated. Most of all, CVS should be ashamed for what they put this physician through. So thankful he fought back. His office is no "pill mill'. He does drug testing multiple times a year and sees patients a minimum of four times a year.

  2. Brian W, I fear I have not been sufficiently entertaining to bring you back. Here is a real laugh track that just might do it. When one is grabbed by the scruff of his worldview and made to choose between his Confession and his profession ... it is a not a hard choice, given the Confession affects eternity. But then comes the hardship in this world. Imagine how often I hear taunts like yours ... "what, you could not even pass character and fitness after they let you sit and pass their bar exam ... dude, there must really be something wrong with you!" Even one of the Bishop's foremost courtiers said that, when explaining why the RCC refused to stand with me. You want entertaining? How about watching your personal economy crash while you have a wife and five kids to clothe and feed. And you can't because you cannot work, because those demanding you cast off your Confession to be allowed into "their" profession have all the control. And you know that they are wrong, dead wrong, and that even the professional code itself allows your Faithful stand, to wit: "A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of Rule 1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law." YET YOU ARE A NONPERSON before the BLE, and will not be heard on your rights or their duties to the law -- you are under tyranny, not law. And so they win in this world, you lose, and you lose even your belief in the rule of law, and demoralization joins poverty, and very troubling thoughts impeaching self worth rush in to fill the void where your career once lived. Thoughts you did not think possible. You find yourself a failure ... in your profession, in your support of your family, in the mirror. And there is little to keep hope alive, because tyranny rules so firmly and none, not the church, not the NGO's, none truly give a damn. Not even a new court, who pay such lip service to justice and ancient role models. You want entertainment? Well if you are on the side of the courtiers running the system that has crushed me, as I suspect you are, then Orwell must be a real riot: "There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever." I never thought they would win, I always thought that at the end of the day the rule of law would prevail. Yes, the rule of man's law. Instead power prevailed, so many rules broken by the system to break me. It took years, but, finally, the end that Dr Bowman predicted is upon me, the end that she advised the BLE to take to break me. Ironically, that is the one thing in her far left of center report that the BLE (after stamping, in red ink, on Jan 22) is uninterested in, as that the BLE and ADA office that used the federal statute as a sword now refuses to even dialogue on her dire prediction as to my fate. "C'est la vie" Entertaining enough for you, status quo defender?

  3. Low energy. Next!

  4. Had William Pryor made such provocative statements as a candidate for the Indiana bar he could have been blackballed as I have documented elsewhere on this ezine. That would have solved this huuuge problem for the Left and abortion industry the good old boy (and even girl) Indiana way. Note that Diane Sykes could have made a huuge difference, but she chose to look away like most all jurists who should certainly recognize a blatantly unconstitutional system when filed on their docket. See footnotes 1 & 2 here: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html Sykes and Kanne could have applied a well established exception to Rooker Feldman, but instead seemingly decided that was not available to conservative whistleblowers, it would seem. Just a loss and two nice footnotes to numb the pain. A few short years later Sykes ruled the very opposite on the RF question, just as she had ruled the very opposite on RF a few short years before. Indy and the abortion industry wanted me on the ground ... they got it. Thank God Alabama is not so corrupted! MAGA!!!

  5. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/ogden-quitting-law-citing-high-disciplinary-fine/PARAMS/article/35323 THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

ADVERTISEMENT