LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Lauren C. Sorrell

Senior Associate, Krieg DeVault LLP, Indianapolis; Indiana University Maurer School of Law, 2012

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lauren Sorrell is a talented attorney whose work ethic, leadership skills, sense of humor and community involvement separate her from others. She is a member of the firm’s litigation and creditors’ rights and bankruptcy practice groups, and is one of the chairs of the firm’s summer associate program. One colleague describes her written work product as “outstanding” and says she is one of the best legal writers he’s ever worked with. Clients are impressed with her attention to detail and timeliness and praise her positivity, even in times of high stress and short deadlines.

sorrell-2-15col.jpg (IL Photo/Eric Learned)

What needs to be done to make the profession more diverse, especially in leadership roles?

I hope to see more women in leadership roles in our profession as time goes on. While there’s so much that needs to happen to achieve that goal, first and foremost, women need to support one another both formally through mentorship, networks and policies, and informally through friendship, encouragement and advocacy. Along those lines, mentorship is so important — setting an example, being a resource and an advocate, and providing support and guidance all go a long way toward promoting diversity and encouraging progress.

What’s been your most memorable case?

I had the privilege of working on a large qui tam case over the past couple of years. It had it all — fascinating subject matter, a great client and a lot of moving parts that made it both interesting and challenging at every step. I’ve found cases requiring a long-term team effort and really allowing for a deep dive into all of the facets of what’s going on to be particularly enjoyable and memorable.

Why did you become a lawyer?

It wasn’t something I was set on from an early age. I actually didn’t decide on law school until the end of college, when I was already studying for the GMAT. After some thinking and researching, I thought that the law would open the most doors for me professionally and allow me to work in a variety of industries and work environments. 

What will the profession look like in 15 years?

That’s hard to imagine, since I’ve only been a part of it for five years myself! The legal profession seems to be always changing so quickly, as does legal education. I’d think and hope that we’ll see a lot more diversity in lawyers and leaders over the course of the next 15 years. Additionally, I imagine technology will continue to change how we practice law, how we interact with and serve clients, and how we deliver work product.

What’s the best advice you got from a mentor?

First, many people have emphasized to me the importance of the people we surround ourselves with professionally, and I’ve found that ringing true many times already in my career. Liking and respecting the people I work with enhances every part of my work life and makes a challenging job so much easier and more enjoyable. Second is to never be afraid to ask — both to ask questions and to ask for what you want or need. There have been so many occasions on which I’ve learned something completely unexpected, yet entirely relevant and important, or received exactly what I needed, simply because I took the time to ask the right questions of the right people. There is a lot of wisdom and experience — and so many resources — out there to be accessed and shared.

Why is it important to be active within legal and community organizations?

For me, there are a few primary reasons why I have an interest in being involved in a variety of organizations. First, it’s important to look for ways to contribute — whether that be time and energy, a particular skill, etc. — particularly since I’ve been on the receiving end of so much support, encouragement and good fortune. Second, it’s a way to engage with different activities, people and hobbies that are outside of my work and the normal days. I’ve always been interested in so many things, and volunteering and participating in a variety of organizations allows me to feed those additional interests and engage with different parts of my personality. Lastly, it’s a great way to build a network and connect with the community, both the people and the city itself. 

What are the advantages and drawbacks of being always accessible to clients and working anywhere, thanks to technology?

What’s great about it is the flexibility it provides — no longer are attorneys tethered to their desks, only able to be reached by an office phone. It allows for so many different work arrangements and environments, which adds diversity to the profession in a lot of ways. However, the drawback of always being accessible is, of course, always being accessible. Without a very intentional effort to do so, we never really leave work behind.

What attracted you to your practice area?

I really like research and writing, and didn’t realize how much of litigation was made up of those two things until I started working. I also love the fact that, as a litigator in a firm with a broad scope of clients and industries, I’m always getting to work on a variety of types of matters in all sorts of areas. There’s variety in substance, yet consistency in process, and I really enjoy that.

What do you do to unwind?

Aside from spending time with my husband, friends and family, I love reading, cooking, sports (in particular: Indiana Hoosiers, Chicago Bears, Chicago Cubs and the Olympics), being outside, swimming, listening to podcasts, enjoying all that Indy has to offer, and dreaming of our next road trip or travel destination (and what we’ll eat there).

Where do you see yourself in 20 years?

I plan to have really mastered something professionally — to have become an expert in a particular area of the law or an industry. I’d love to have a family with my husband, to have traveled to all 50 states, and to teach a course or be involved in legal education in some capacity. I hope to feel content and energized in my professional and personal lives, and to still have the drive to learn.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  2. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.

  3. Been on social security sense sept 2011 2massive strokes open heart surgery and serious ovarian cancer and a blood clot in my lung all in 14 months. Got a letter in may saying that i didn't qualify and it was in form like i just applied ,called social security she said it don't make sense and you are still geting a check in june and i did ,now i get a check from my part D asking for payment for july because there will be no money for my membership, call my prescription coverage part D and confirmed no check will be there.went to social security they didn't want to answer whats going on just said i should of never been on it .no one knows where this letter came from was California im in virginia and been here sense my strokes and vcu filed for my disability i was in the hospital when they did it .It's like it was a error . My ,mothers social security was being handled in that office in California my sister was dealing with it and it had my social security number because she died last year and this letter came out of the same office and it came at the same time i got the letter for my mother benefits for death and they had the same date of being typed just one was on the mail Saturday and one on Monday. . I think it's a mistake and it should been fixed instead there just getting rid of me .i never got a formal letter saying when i was being tsken off.

  4. Employers should not have racially discriminating mind set. It has huge impact on the society what the big players do or don't do in the industry. Background check is conducted just to verify whether information provided by the prospective employee is correct or not. It doesn't have any direct combination with the rejection of the employees. If there is rejection, there should be something effective and full-proof things on the table that may keep the company or the people associated with it in jeopardy.

  5. Unlike the federal judge who refused to protect me, the Virginia State Bar gave me a hearing. After the hearing, the Virginia State Bar refused to discipline me. VSB said that attacking me with the court ADA coordinator had, " all the grace and charm of a drive-by shooting." One does wonder why the VSB was able to have a hearing and come to that conclusion, but the federal judge in Indiana slammed the door of the courthouse in my face.