Leading the way at ITLA

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Dan Chamberlain, a partner at the Indianapolis plaintiffs law firm Cohen & Malad P.C., was involved in litigation that led to one of the largest settlements in American history — the National Football League’s $1 billion settlement for retired players suffering from conditions resulting from traumatic brain injury. But closer to home, he’s also trying to make sure that Hoosiers and Indiana lawyers are comforted in their times of need.

focus-chamberlain-0447-forweb-15col.jpg Dan Chamberlain, left, shakes hands and accepts the gavel as president of the Indiana Trial Lawyers Association from Past President John Young. (Photo courtesy of ITLA )

Here are a few questions Chamberlain answered about himself and his plans for his year as president of the Indiana Trial Lawyers Association, which began in May with a passing of the gavel from Past President John Young.

Indiana Lawyer: What does ITLA mean to you?

Chamberlain: I became a lawyer 25 years ago and was introduced to ITLA by former President Max Goodwin. Max had the most impressive phrase about ITLA, “We do good things, for the right reasons … for everyone.” That statement is still the same today as it was a quarter of a century ago. ITLA stands for the rights to trial by jury and equal access to all, regardless of income, gender and race. All lawyers should subscribe to these ideals as we did when we took our Supreme Court oath to be officers of the court.

As president, what are your priorities for the organization? Any initiatives you’re planning?

Promote professionalism and civility. One of the (things) that I believe is important is our initiative with Gleaners Food Bank, and also participating in providing meals and assistance to attorneys and their families suffering serious illness. I hope to partner with other bar associations to implement this program.

What do you consider the most important areas for ITLA to lobby for changes in the law or to preserve laws that might be in jeopardy?

Immunities limiting access to justice are dangerous and should be defeated or repealed. But there should also be protection for the right to contract, unencumbered, for necessary legal services and preserve such things as class action, mass tort, injury and other areas requiring intervention in our judicial system.

What’s something about you personally that ITLA members might not know?

I received a music scholarship to college. The highlight of my experience was playing with Chuck Mangione and Maynard Ferguson. Once. I wasn’t asked back. I decided to be a lawyer.

You’ve been involved with some high-profile, complex traumatic brain injury cases and class-action litigation. What have experiences like those taught you about yourself?

About Dan Chamberlain factboxI transitioned to the board of the Brain Injury Association of America about 10 years ago. BIAA is based in Washington, D.C., and has approximately 30 chapters and offices across the United States. I became the BIAA chair at about the time that the NFL class-action litigation was gaining traction in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. As BIAA chair, our board decided that we would file amicus briefs on the science and medicine of brain injury. The affidavits accompanying the various amicus briefs up to the Supreme Court of the United States were a part of the overall judicial record of the largest settlement of its kind in U.S. history. Without the help of the folks at Cohen & Malad, I would never have had the ability or option to participate in this brain injury litigation helping retired NFL players and their families collect entitlement benefits under the settlement.

What do you think you’d be doing for a living if you weren’t a trial lawyer?

Definitely not a musician, but probably a doctor or other health care provider working with brain injury survivors.

Tell us a bit about your family and things you enjoy doing.

I have three kids, two boys and a girl. The oldest is 23 and will be a permanent student in Colorado. My youngest is 13 and she attends Park Tudor. My middle son will be 21 shortly and just returned to Fort Hood from his first military tour in the Middle East. One of my least favorite activities is watching the news when my son is deployed. Proud of all of them.

My wife loves teaching little kids and went back to her same classroom at Hamilton Southeastern after 13 years. The kids love her.

As far as my hobbies, I used to enjoy playing golf. But, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. I got the message and moved on.

I became interested in target shooting when Jim McDonald and ITLA hosted a skeet shooting event. It was really a lot of fun and paired with a renewed interest in fishing, I like that neither the skeet or fish are able to voice a position in opposition to mine.

What would you say are your proudest personal and professional achievements?

Being in Congress with the leadership of Walter Reed Medical Center, Department of Defense, Wounded Warriors, Kessler Foundation, NIH and members of the TBI Congressional Task Force.

When Sen. Joe Donnelly approached the BIAA to support the Sexton Military Suicide Prevention Act, we were honored. The legislation mandated baseline screening and testing, counseling and other brain services for all current and future military service members across the country. It was visionary. Who would have known that my son would be among those active military duty members who will benefit from the Sexton Act?

The proudest achievement other than family and friends, is following in the footsteps of great ITLA leaders that came before me and will succeed me. I am proud to be the 62nd president of the Indiana Trial Lawyers Association.•

– Compiled by Dave Stafford


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The voices of the prophets are more on blogs than subway walls these days, Dawn. Here is the voice of one calling out in the wilderness ... against a corrupted judiciary ... that remains corrupt a decade and a half later ... due to, so sadly, the acquiescence of good judges unwilling to shake the forest ... for fear that is not faith ..

  2. So I purchased a vehicle cash from the lot on West Washington in Feb 2017. Since then I found it the vehicle had been declared a total loss and had sat in a salvage yard due to fire. My title does not show any of that. I also have had to put thousands of dollars into repairs because it was not a solid vehicle like they stated. I need to find out how to contact the lawyers on this lawsuit.

  3. It really doesn't matter what the law IS, if law enforcement refuses to take reports (or take them seriously), if courts refuse to allow unrepresented parties to speak (especially in Small Claims, which is supposedly "informal"). It doesn't matter what the law IS, if constituents are unable to make effective contact or receive any meaningful response from their representatives. Two of our pets were unnecessarily killed; court records reflect that I "abandoned" them. Not so; when I was denied one of them (and my possessions, which by court order I was supposed to be able to remove), I went directly to the court. And earlier, when I tried to have the DV PO extended (it expired while the subject was on probation for violating it), the court denied any extension. The result? Same problems, less than eight hours after expiration. Ironic that the county sheriff was charged (and later pleaded to) with intimidation, but none of his officers seemed interested or capable of taking such a report from a private citizen. When I learned from one officer what I needed to do, I forwarded audio and transcript of one occurrence and my call to law enforcement (before the statute of limitations expired) to the prosecutor's office. I didn't even receive an acknowledgement. Earlier, I'd gone in to the prosecutor's office and been told that the officer's (written) report didn't match what I said occurred. Since I had the audio, I can only say that I have very little faith in Indiana government or law enforcement.

  4. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  5. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.