ILNews

‘Leaky pipeline’ study spotlights gender inequality in law schools

Marilyn Odendahl
November 30, 2016
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The problems of gender inequality in the legal profession start when women apply to law school, according to a new report from Law School Transparency.

Data compiled by Deborah Jones Merritt, professor at Moritz College of Law at The Ohio State University, and Kyle McEntee, executive director of LST, shows the pipeline leading women to a J.D. degree has many leaks. Women are applying to law school at a much lower rate than men, they are not admitted in the same numbers as their male counterparts and they are more likely to attend schools that have worse job placement rates.

McEntee described his reaction to the data as “shocked.” Crunching numbers from the American Bar Association, he found that since 2000, the inequality between men and women law students has increased. By 2011, the split had become statistically significant and could not be attributed to random behavior.

The study found that 2.6 percent of female college graduates apply to law school compared to 3.4 percent of male college graduates. If women applied at the same rate as men, applications would jump 16 percent overall.

The lower number of applications cannot be linked to women not having an interest in graduate education. Women outpace men in earning master’s and doctoral degrees, 59.9 percent and 51.8 percent respectively.

Once they apply to law school, women are less likely to be admitted than men, the study found. Male students outnumber female students in law school. Overall for the class that enrolled in the fall of 2015, 79.5 percent of male applicants were admitted as compared to 75.8 percent female applicants.

In addition, women students are clustering in the “least regarded” law schools, McEntee said. The study examined 11 schools with strong placement rates which had at least 85 percent of their graduates getting full-time, long-term jobs requiring bar passage. But those schools averaged just 46.6 percent female enrollment.

Conversely, law schools that placed less than 40 percent of their graduates in full-time, long-term, J.D.-required positions had an average female enrollment of 55.9 percent.

This disparity is seen in Indiana.

Notre Dame Law School, ranked in the Top 25 by U.S. News and World Report, admitted a class in 2015 that comprised 59 percent men and 42 percent women. Comparatively, Valparaiso University Law School, which is unranked by the magazine and was recently censured by the ABA, admitted a class the same year that was 49 percent men and 51 percent women.

Of the Notre Dame Law School students who graduated in 2015, a total of 130 graduates obtained full-time, long-term, J.D. required jobs. Four of these jobs where listed as funded by the law school or university. Valparaiso had 55 graduates in the Class of 2015 land this kind of employment. None of these jobs were funded by the law school or university.

Merritt and McEntee speculated a cause of the gender inequality might be the U.S. News rankings. As law schools vie for the top spots on the Best Law Schools list, they might be less inclined to accept applicants with lower LSAT scores. According to McEntee, women, on the whole, score two points lower on the law school entrance exam than men, which could be putting the female applicants at a disadvantage.

However by the time women take the bar exam, they outperform expectations based on their LSAT scores. Looking at data from National Association for Law Placement, Merritt and McEntee noted of the Class of 2015, 66.4 percent of the women and 67.0 percent of the men secured jobs that required bar passage.

Indiana Board of Law Examiners does not collect data on the number of men versus women passing the state’s bar exam.

Merritt believes that law schools have put the priority on improving their U.S. News ranking at the cost of gender equity. She is hoping law school faculty and deans will look at this study and consider ways to attract more women.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Social justice demands action NOW
    A high ranking bureaucrat with Ind sup court is heading up an organization celebrating the formal N word!!! She must resign and denounce! http://m.indianacompanies.us/friends-educational-fund-for-negroes.364110.company.v2#top_info
  • Wont work
    ND2019, don't try to confuse the Left with facts. Their ideologies trump facts, trump due process, trump court rules, even trump federal statutes. I hold the proof if interested. Facts matter only to those who are not on an agenda-first mission.
  • Outdated
    This year, Notre Dame actually enrolled an equal amount of male and female students.
    • Math check
      The actual quote is"Overall for the class that enrolled in the fall of 2015, 79.5 percent of male applicants were admitted as compared to 75.8 percent female applicants." That means they rejected 20.5 % of male applicants and 24.4 % of female applicants.
    • Missing data
      This analysis would benefit from knowing the pass rates for the bar exam for men and women. The different scores on the LSAT suggest the test is biased. If women shave lower LSAT scores and pass the bar at the same rate, the test should be examined.
    • Check my Math
      "Overall for the class that enrolled in the fall of 2015, 79.5 percent were male and 75.8 percent were female." I'm no math major, but shouldn't the breakdown between male and female total 100%? Did anyone notice that this adds up to 155.3%?

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
      1. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

      2. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!

      3. @ Rebecca D Fell, I am very sorry for your loss. I think it gives the family solace and a bit of closure to go to a road side memorial. Those that oppose them probably did not experience the loss of a child or a loved one.

      4. If it were your child that died maybe you'd be more understanding. Most of us don't have graves to visit. My son was killed on a state road and I will be putting up a memorial where he died. It gives us a sense of peace to be at the location he took his last breath. Some people should be more understanding of that.

      5. Can we please take notice of the connection between the declining state of families across the United States and the RISE OF CPS INVOLVEMENT??? They call themselves "advocates" for "children's rights", however, statistics show those children whom are taken from, even NEGLIGENT homes are LESS likely to become successful, independent adults!!! Not to mention the undeniable lack of respect and lack of responsibility of the children being raised today vs the way we were raised 20 years ago, when families still existed. I was born in 1981 and I didn't even ever hear the term "CPS", in fact, I didn't even know they existed until about ten years ago... Now our children have disagreements between friends and they actually THREATEN EACH OTHER WITH, "I'll call CPS" or "I'll have [my parent] (usually singular) call CPS"!!!! And the truth is, no parent is perfect and we all have flaws and make mistakes, but it is RIGHTFULLY OURS - BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THIS GREAT NATION - to be imperfect. Let's take a good look at what kind of parenting those that are stealing our children are doing, what kind of adults are they producing? WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS TO THE CHILDREN THAT HAVE BEEN RIPPED FROM THEIR FAMILY AND THAT CHILD'S SUCCESS - or otherwise - AS AN ADULT.....

      ADVERTISEMENT