ILNews

Legal community remembers longtime judge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

On Sept. 17, hundreds of people gathered at the Jackson County Courthouse in Brownstown to celebrate the life of Judge Robert R. Brown, who died Sept. 12. Judge Brown, who was 78, retired as Jackson Circuit judge in 1999 after 28 years on the bench.

In 1999, Judge William Vance was appointed as Jackson Circuit judge. He recalled that his predecessor was known for his outstanding character.

“The one comment that you’ll find more and more is that he really was a gentleman,” Judge Vance said. “He was quiet, he was respectful – I don’t know of any judge who respected litigators and litigants more.”

Indiana Supreme Court Justice Steven David recalled that when he was a young lawyer, he tried his first case in Judge Brown’s court.
 

brown-robert-mug Brown

“I was prepared but extremely nervous,” Justice David said. “He easily recognized my nervousness and calmed me down. I will never forget that. I appeared before him on several occasions thereafter. I am not sure I ever ‘won’ any of my cases before him, but he was the consummate judge.”

Justice David said that Judge Brown was a mentor to young lawyers.

“When I was elected judge of the Boone Circuit Court, he was one of the first sitting judges to send me a congratulatory note,” Justice David said. “The many, many years that he served the citizens of Jackson County are indicative of the great man that he was.”

Jennings Circuit Judge Jon Webster also recalled Judge Brown’s importance to young lawyers.

“When I began practicing in 1982 and up until I took office in 1987, I tried many cases in front of Judge Brown, and he was always … very patient, and that meant a lot to me,” Judge Webster said. “More importantly, when I took office in 1987, he took me and many other young judges under his wing, treated us as equals, and was always a mentor. He was a very down-to-earth guy.”

After Judge Brown retired from the bench, he served as a senior judge and certified mediator throughout southern Indiana and joined the Seymour law firm of Montgomery Elsner & Pardieck, where he successfully mediated more than 500 cases.

Judge Brown had been president of the Indiana Judges Association, a member of the Indiana Supreme Court Rules Committee, and a hearing officer of the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission. He also served as counsel to the Democratic caucus of the Indiana House of Representatives, where he drafted Indiana’s Horizontal Property Regime (Condominium) law. Judge Brown was the founder of the Jackson County Juvenile Group Home, which since 1979 has provided an alternative to jail or institutionalization for juvenile offenders.

Judge Brown was born in Whiteland and graduated from Franklin College, where he was the president of Sigma Alpha Epsilon. He was a U.S. Army veteran and earned his law degree in 1963 from Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis.

He formed the Seymour firm of Whitcomb & Brown with Edgar D. Whitcomb, who later became secretary of state, then governor, of Indiana.

In 1965, he was appointed by Gov. Roger Branigin to serve as prosecutor of Jackson County and was elected to that post in 1966, where he served until his election as Circuit judge of Jackson County.

In recognition of his service to Indiana, Judge Brown was named a Sagamore of the Wabash, the state of Indiana’s highest civilian honor, by Govs. Whitcomb, Robert D. Orr, Evan Bayh, and Frank O’Bannon. O’Bannon’s widow, Judy O’Bannon, spoke at Judge Brown’s memorial service.

He is survived by his wife, Donna; brother, William (Sue Ann) Brown, Indianapolis; sister, Sue (Don) Lockmiller, Johnson City, Tenn.; son Jeffery Brown, Seymour; son Douglas (Constance) Brown, Indianapolis; daughter Kristen (Douglas) Bryant, Greenwood; seven grandchildren, and two great-grandchildren.

Memorial contributions may be made to Jackson County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) or Brownstown Presbyterian Church through Spurgeon Funeral Home in Brownstown.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  2. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  3. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

  4. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

  5. I totally agree with John Smith.

ADVERTISEMENT