ILNews

Legal fight fuels tensions in tight-knit tech world

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A trademark-infringement case brought against App Press LLC threatens to smother the tech startup in legal fees before it reaches its potential.

And in a curious twist, the case also has generated grumblings in the tightknit developer community toward a big law firm that is representing App Press’ opponent in the federal court case.

Indianapolis-based Barnes & Thornburg LLP, whose clients include numerous Indiana tech entrepreneurs and which has supported local tech initiatives, is representing New York City-based Apress Media LLC against locally based App Press.

App Press was founded two years ago by 20-something wunderkinds Grant Glas and Kevin Smith. The duo’s software, accessed by customers over its website, allows graphic designers to create an app for mobile devices even if they don’t know how to write software code.

The product appears to have hit the bull’s-eye, based on reviews in such trade journals as PC Mag.com and the magazine of the Society of Publications Designers.

App Press has more than 100 recurring customers as far away as Australia. Also notable is that it has drawn a financial and advisory interest from Minh Nguyen, who — with Napster founder Sean Parker — created online address book and social media site Plaxo. Communication giant Comcast bought Plaxo in 2008.

Legal battles “can crush a company,” said Nguyen, now CEO of the software firm Syllabuster, who came to town to help Glas and Smith refine their product.

“To have all that taken away just because of some legal mumbo jumbo … Dude, it’s like taking away the name of your baby,” Nguyen said.

The potentially expensive legal battle began last year. That’s when Apress’ lawyers in Boston sent App Press a letter alleging the Indianapolis firm was trying to play off the trademarked Apress name recognition to appeal to designers and developers, “the very customers for our client’s goods and services.”

App Press’ lawyer, Jake Cox, disputed the trademark infringement claim. He said the two companies’ names are distinct enough and aren’t even pronounced similarly.

Apress used to be known as Author’s Press and describes itself as the “leading publisher” in programming resources for the iPhone, iPad and Android markets. Its customers use its publication to do such things as app coding.

The legal wrangling continued. An attorney for Apress responded to Cox that the fact that App Press is two words rather than one and is spelled differently is irrelevant from a trademark standpoint “because when the marks are pronounced in the normal course of conversation, they are likely to sound the same.”

With persistent cease-and-desist requests by Apress, App Press last May filed a complaint for declaratory relief in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

“Based on Apress Media’s recent conduct, App Press is faced with the choice of abandoning its right to use the registered trademark App Press or being sued for liability and damages regarding such use,” Cox said in the court filing.

Then, last July, Barnes & Thornburg entered the picture. It took on the case on behalf of Apress, filing a counterclaim and reasserting its claims App Press was guilty of trademark infringement.

“There is a risk that consumers and authors may mistakenly associate content published by App Press — lacking any meaningful content review or quality control — with Apress, thereby harming Apress’ reputation as a publisher of high-quality works,” an attorney for Barnes and Thornburg wrote.

The case is still pending. But word that Barnes & Thornburg was working against a local tech firm has circulated among developers, including those at Developer Town.

“I’m a big supporter of Grant and everything he’s doing,” said Michael Coffey, a partner at Developer Town. “The smart choice would be to back out of the case,” Coffey said of Barnes & Thornburg. If not, “it would lose a lot of credibility.”

He added that rival law firm Ice Miller would be happy to expand its services to the local tech community, which he calls “a very, very tight community.”

The law firm, in a statement, said it is reticent to discuss client matters publicly.

“Unfortunately, businesses can find that their interests conflict and sometimes this leads to disputes. When one of our clients is involved in a dispute, it’s our job to represent them,” said B&T.

“Our firm proudly supports the Indianapolis technology community. We have a long history of promoting a vigorous and healthy climate for all business and entrepreneurial activity in Indiana and beyond, and we will continue to do so in the future.”

Business is business, but the legal dispute has turned out to be a distraction for App Press.

“We took all the necessary steps,” Glas said of Apress’ challenge, noting that his firm successfully filed for and obtained a trademark.

He’s trying to look at the positive side, interpreting Apress’ challenge as a validation of sorts of App Press’ growing presence in the market.

Nguyen said Glas and Smith have been on the right track.

“They’ve done everything. They put in all the right tools. They’re collecting data from the users. To see that execution transfer into exponential growth and make money has been fascinating,” said Nguyen, who in recent years has coached about 10 companies.

Not only that, he tells the App Press team, “You guys haven’t [even] done any marketing.”

Such talk from a Silicon Valley rock star is affirming to Glas, who met Nguyen earlier this year at Distilled Intelligence, an event hosted in Washington, D.C.

After Glas’ pitch, App Press placed in the top 10.

At a cocktail party that followed, Nguyen, whom Glas didn’t know, approached him and told Glas he liked the company’s business model.

Later, “a reporter said, ‘Do you know who you were talking with?’” Glas recalled. “I went back up to him.”

Nguyen has been helping the firm refine its product offering as well as inspiring the duo to think big about the possibilities of growth.

“We’ve been here at least 13, 14 hours a day,” Nguyen said of his recent visit to Indianapolis.

“The development community here is pretty deep. I just didn’t know how deep,” he said. “Indiana has lots of startups. It’s a nice surprise, really.”

As for how this whole legal battle with Apress will turn out, at the least it will provide a good life lesson, said Developer Town’s Coffey.

Coffey was involved in a company that found itself in a battle against Connecticut-based United Technologies Corp., whose holdings include the locally based Carrier brand of HVAC systems. After his company created a product for UTC, the corporate giant insisted on partial rights to it.

It was a costly distraction, but his company eventually won its fight.

“Do we crowd-fund a legal defense?” Nguyen thinks, openly, back at the loft in Broad Ripple.

Like a protective uncle, he advises the local tech community to “band together and try to help these guys.”•

Originally published in Indianapolis Business Journal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. "Am I bugging you? I don't mean to bug ya." If what I wrote below is too much social philosophy for Indiana attorneys, just take ten this vacay to watch The Lego Movie with kiddies and sing along where appropriate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etzMjoH0rJw

  2. I've got some free speech to share here about who is at work via the cat's paw of the ACLU stamping out Christian observances.... 2 Thessalonians chap 2: "And we also thank God continually because, when you received the word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as a human word, but as it actually is, the word of God, which is indeed at work in you who believe. For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those churches suffered from the Jews who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to everyone in their effort to keep us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved. In this way they always heap up their sins to the limit. The wrath of God has come upon them at last."

  3. Did someone not tell people who have access to the Chevy Volts that it has a gas engine and will run just like a normal car? The batteries give the Volt approximately a 40 mile range, but after that the gas engine will propel the vehicle either directly through the transmission like any other car, or gas engine recharges the batteries depending on the conditions.

  4. Catholic, Lutheran, even the Baptists nuzzling the wolf! http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-documents-reveal-obama-hhs-paid-baptist-children-family-services-182129786-four-months-housing-illegal-alien-children/ YET where is the Progressivist outcry? Silent. I wonder why?

  5. Thank you, Honorable Ladies, and thank you, TIL, for this interesting interview. The most interesting question was the last one, which drew the least response. Could it be that NFP stamps are a threat to the very foundation of our common law American legal tradition, a throwback to the continental system that facilitated differing standards of justice? A throwback to Star Chamber’s protection of the landed gentry? If TIL ever again interviews this same panel, I would recommend inviting one known for voicing socio-legal dissent for the masses, maybe Welch, maybe Ogden, maybe our own John Smith? As demographics shift and our social cohesion precipitously drops, a consistent judicial core will become more and more important so that Justice and Equal Protection and Due Process are yet guiding stars. If those stars fall from our collective social horizon (and can they be seen even now through the haze of NFP opinions?) then what glue other than more NFP decisions and TRO’s and executive orders -- all backed by more and more lethally armed praetorians – will prop up our government institutions? And if and when we do arrive at such an end … will any then dare call that tyranny? Or will the cost of such dissent be too high to justify?

ADVERTISEMENT