ILNews

Legal service nonprofits look to private dollars as public funds shrink

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The alteration the Indianapolis Legal Aid Society made this season to its letters soliciting donations reflects a strategic decision by the nonprofit to go after higher contributions and underscores the need for service organizations of any kind to be aggressive.

Each year, ILAS runs its annual dollar campaign by sending a letter and a dollar bill to potential donors. The organization then asks the individuals to return the dollars with the hope they will reach into their wallets and add more.

John Floreancig Floreancig

This year’s letter, in addition to explaining what ILAS does and touting its ability to handle a case for $100, encourages donors to give specific amounts. About 350 donors were mailed special letters asking for high dollar contributions, while another 7,600 donors were invited to give the equivalent of a billable hour or an amount that would help a certain number of clients.

“If we can show the bar we really can help people for $100, maybe a donor will say, ‘I’ll help 500 people,’” said John Floreancig, general counsel at ILAS.

The legal aid society has to be more upfront about its need since its main source of funding, the United Way of Central Indiana, decided to reduce the appropriation made to ILAS by $126,000, or roughly one-third.

To cover the shortfall, ILAS has to look for money from other sources, especially private individuals. However, Floreancig conceded that whether central Indiana is willing to give more support to another legal service provider is unknown. That’s why ILAS is trying to aggressively position itself in a competitive nonprofit market.

Individual donors – inside and outside the bar – are becoming more important for all legal service nonprofits as money from federal and state sources shrinks. Complicating the fundraising effort is the confidential nature of the work the legal aid attorneys do and the little understanding non-lawyers have about legal aid.

Yet, experts in philanthropy contend the obstacles are not insurmountable. The key is educating the public and offering a compelling reason to contribute.

While many people may agree that providing access to the judiciary is important, they will not necessarily give financial support to the effort. Individuals who have been helped by legal aid or know someone who was in a difficult situation and received free legal assistance will be more likely to give because they have seen evidence that the organization is serving a need, said Kris

Kindelsperger, senior executive consultant with Johnson Grossnickle and Associates.

Indianapolis Legal Aid Society has hired Johnson Grossnickle and Associates to help develop a plan for its fundraising efforts. The nonprofit has already determined it wants to reach outside the legal community for donations.

The legal service providers will have to explain to potential donors what they do, why the services are necessary and the impact the organization has, Kindelsperger said, because many times the clients helped can be invisible to other sectors of the population.

Funding sources

One way to cultivate donors from outside the legal community is by building relationships. During the ILAS’s 2012 dollar campaign, board members made personal appeals to colleagues, which increased donations to a record high of more than $150,000.

Chuck Dunlap Dunlap

In Evansville, a trivia night competition to raise money for legal services has started to attract non-lawyers as well as increase awareness among attorneys. The Evansville Bar Association sponsors this event and other activities to solicit contributions for the Evansville Legal Aid Society and the Volunteer Lawyer Program of Southwestern Indiana.

Jean Blanton, attorney at Ziemer Stayman Weitzel & Shoulders LLP and Evansville Legal Aid Society board member, said the funds raised by the bar association give the nonprofit flexibility.

The ELAS gets 50 percent of its budget from the city-county government and 50 percent from the United Way of Southwestern Indiana. However, Blanton said, the funds come with strings attracted and can only go toward certain expenses.

Conversely, donations from the bar association can be used as the nonprofit wants. For example, ELAS upgraded computer equipment with the money from the bar.

Long-term, the funds from the government could hamper the agency’s ability to meet the increasing need. As Blanton explained, the attorneys and staff who work at ELAS are considered government employees, receiving salaries and benefits comparable to other public-sector workers.

This helps to entice people to take the lower-paying legal aid positions, but with no budget increases coming from the municipality, ELAS may not be able to add more workers. Even though the organization could possibly find a new funding source to hire another employee, that worker would not receive government benefits like the other attorneys and staff members get.

seiler Seiler

Evansville is not the only place feeling the crunch of government cutbacks. According to Chuck Dunlap, executive director of the Indiana Bar Foundation, federal and state appropriations have been falling as the demand for services has skyrocketed.

Legal Services Corp., the federal agency which provides grants for legal assistance, has recorded a $60-million cut in funding from Congress during the two years since fiscal year 2011. In fiscal year 2013, Capitol Hill budgeted $340.9 million to the organization.

The 12 pro bono districts in Indiana are given money from the state’s Interest on Lawyer Trust Accounts. But with the recession and the drop in interest rates, the amount in the fund has sunk from $3 million to $300,000.

One bright spot: The state’s Civil Legal Aid Fund, which supports legal aid providers around Indiana, was given a $500,000 bump in 2007 to $1.5 million. The money in this pot comes from the Legislature and is administered by the Indiana Supreme Court.

The Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic, located in Indianapolis and Fort Wayne, cobbles together funding from federal and state sources along with donations from individuals, corporations and churches.

Contributions from private sources comprise about 10 to 15 percent of the clinic’s $2 million annual budget, said Josh Abel, executive director. In the past, these donations totaled 25 percent of the yearly budget. The percentage has dropped despite the dollar amount remaining steady because funding from other avenues has picked up.

Abel said the clinic does not have as strong an individual donor base as other nonprofits like domestic-violence shelters and food pantries. Non-lawyers do not always understand why people need civil representation and often are confused why public defenders are not providing the service.

To educate people, the clinic puts the spotlight on the individuals it helps rather than identifying itself as a legal service organization. Stories of protecting victims of domestic violence and assisting immigrants fleeing persecution are more likely to resonate with potential donors.

The clinic has worked to create programs that are responsive to the community’s needs, Abel said, and that attracts contributions.

Room for one more

Still, getting contributions even from the legal community can be difficult. At the Hammond Legal Aid Clinic in northern Indiana, executive director Kris Sakelaris has found it easier to ask attorneys for pro bono help than to ask for money.

The clinic was established in 2003 by Mayor Thomas McDermott Jr., an attorney and recipient of the Randall T. Shepard Award for pro bono work. Its entire budget is appropriated from the mayor’s discretionary fund.

Sometimes attorneys make donations or clients may include a few dollars in a thank-you note, but otherwise the clinic does not put much effort into soliciting contributions.

A former magistrate in the Lake Superior Court, Civil and Family Division, Sakelaris has friendships with many local attorneys and knows whom to call when the clinic needs help. Making a request for pro bono services is more likely to bring a yes than putting a hand out for money, she said.

As ILAS prepares to escalate its fundraising activities, the question is raised as to how that will impact donations among the other legal service providers.

Both Kindelsperger and Tim Seiler, director of The Fund Raising School at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, agreed that donors do not usually stop giving to one nonprofit to shift their money to another organization.

In addition, central Indiana has not hit a saturation point in terms of giving, Seiler said, although he conceded others hold the opposite view. National studies show individuals give an average of 1.7 percent to 2.2 percent of their disposable household income to charities, which to Seiler indicates there is room for nonprofits to solicit more contributions.

“Our experience is that central Indiana has a lot of very generous individuals and organizations,” Kindelsperger said. “It is a community that is philanthropic by nature. It’s not easy to raise money, but one of the obstacles is not that people aren’t philanthropic.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Have been seeing this wonderful physician for a few years and was one of his patients who told him about what we were being told at CVS. Multiple ones. This was a witch hunt and they shold be ashamed of how patients were treated. Most of all, CVS should be ashamed for what they put this physician through. So thankful he fought back. His office is no "pill mill'. He does drug testing multiple times a year and sees patients a minimum of four times a year.

  2. Brian W, I fear I have not been sufficiently entertaining to bring you back. Here is a real laugh track that just might do it. When one is grabbed by the scruff of his worldview and made to choose between his Confession and his profession ... it is a not a hard choice, given the Confession affects eternity. But then comes the hardship in this world. Imagine how often I hear taunts like yours ... "what, you could not even pass character and fitness after they let you sit and pass their bar exam ... dude, there must really be something wrong with you!" Even one of the Bishop's foremost courtiers said that, when explaining why the RCC refused to stand with me. You want entertaining? How about watching your personal economy crash while you have a wife and five kids to clothe and feed. And you can't because you cannot work, because those demanding you cast off your Confession to be allowed into "their" profession have all the control. And you know that they are wrong, dead wrong, and that even the professional code itself allows your Faithful stand, to wit: "A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of Rule 1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law." YET YOU ARE A NONPERSON before the BLE, and will not be heard on your rights or their duties to the law -- you are under tyranny, not law. And so they win in this world, you lose, and you lose even your belief in the rule of law, and demoralization joins poverty, and very troubling thoughts impeaching self worth rush in to fill the void where your career once lived. Thoughts you did not think possible. You find yourself a failure ... in your profession, in your support of your family, in the mirror. And there is little to keep hope alive, because tyranny rules so firmly and none, not the church, not the NGO's, none truly give a damn. Not even a new court, who pay such lip service to justice and ancient role models. You want entertainment? Well if you are on the side of the courtiers running the system that has crushed me, as I suspect you are, then Orwell must be a real riot: "There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever." I never thought they would win, I always thought that at the end of the day the rule of law would prevail. Yes, the rule of man's law. Instead power prevailed, so many rules broken by the system to break me. It took years, but, finally, the end that Dr Bowman predicted is upon me, the end that she advised the BLE to take to break me. Ironically, that is the one thing in her far left of center report that the BLE (after stamping, in red ink, on Jan 22) is uninterested in, as that the BLE and ADA office that used the federal statute as a sword now refuses to even dialogue on her dire prediction as to my fate. "C'est la vie" Entertaining enough for you, status quo defender?

  3. Low energy. Next!

  4. Had William Pryor made such provocative statements as a candidate for the Indiana bar he could have been blackballed as I have documented elsewhere on this ezine. That would have solved this huuuge problem for the Left and abortion industry the good old boy (and even girl) Indiana way. Note that Diane Sykes could have made a huuge difference, but she chose to look away like most all jurists who should certainly recognize a blatantly unconstitutional system when filed on their docket. See footnotes 1 & 2 here: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html Sykes and Kanne could have applied a well established exception to Rooker Feldman, but instead seemingly decided that was not available to conservative whistleblowers, it would seem. Just a loss and two nice footnotes to numb the pain. A few short years later Sykes ruled the very opposite on the RF question, just as she had ruled the very opposite on RF a few short years before. Indy and the abortion industry wanted me on the ground ... they got it. Thank God Alabama is not so corrupted! MAGA!!!

  5. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/ogden-quitting-law-citing-high-disciplinary-fine/PARAMS/article/35323 THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

ADVERTISEMENT