ILNews

Living Fit: Every step leads you in the right direction to better health

Sharon McGoff
July 17, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

mcgoffFor years, the focus on health has been to get 30 minutes of exercise a day, five to seven days a week. However, no thought was given to how we spent the rest of our day. That is, until several very large studies conducted over the past few years revealed that all people (even exercise enthusiasts who work out one to two hours every day), have a high incidence of ill health and dying from all causes IF the rest of their day is sedentary. WHAT? You mean that my daily hour of morning sweat is not going to keep me from an earlier-than-average-age death? Preposterous! Yet the evidence is clear – no matter what we do for our daily exercise (or not), we must be more mobile throughout our day if we are going to enjoy good health.

The problem is less than 20 percent of jobs require physical movement or exertion, and we are spending more and more time at the office. Face it, in the legal profession, unless you are truly chasing ambulances, you sit almost all day. In fact, some reports show that 23 out of 24 hours of the average working adult’s day is spent either sitting down or lying down. We sit to eat, drive, work, watch TV, talk, order food from our cars, email and surf the Web. We lie down to sleep, nap, watch TV, work on the computer and de-stress. Since 1965, sedentary time outside of work has increased by 40 percent. THINK about THAT! Do you recall you or your parents lifting the garage door to drive the car in; cutting your own grass; riding your bikes or walking to sports practice, school, neighbors’ and friends’ homes, or the store?

Of course, we all know that a sedentary lifestyle leads to heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes, muscle stiffness, poor balance, depression, anxiety, insomnia, high blood pressure, lung disease, weight gain, lethargy, and back, neck and hip pain. But we are largely (pun intended) unaware that exercise alone will not eliminate the health risks associated with too much sitting. We must get off our rear ends! It’s plain and simple, yet so hard to do in our hectic professional and personal lives.

livefit-factbox.gifThe solution: Take at least 10,000 steps a day. Studies have shown over and over again that taking 10,000 steps a day will provide modest weight loss, improved glucose intolerance, decreased BMI, decreased blood pressure, decreased stress, increased productivity, increased state of mind/happiness, increased muscle tone and better sleep. In fact, in one small study of great significance, researchers studied a group of men who typically walk 10,000 steps a day and asked them to reduce their steps to only 1,350 steps each day. They took elevators instead of stairs, drove to work and lunch instead of walking – all the stuff we typically do in our daily lives, right? Well, after just two measly weeks, they found the men’s bodies had become worse at metabolizing sugars and fats, and their distribution of body fat began to migrate toward their midsection – after just two weeks! It makes you wonder what’s going on inside your body, doesn’t it?

The good news: To reap the health benefits of taking 10,000 steps a day, the walking does not have to be prolonged or vigorous as long as it’s sprinkled throughout your day and consistent. Oh, but you say there is no time in your day to be active and walk? Yes, there is. Get creative, change your habits and think outside the box you’ve stuffed yourself into for too long. Did you know that by replacing sedentary TV time with active time, you could lose 50 pounds a year? Imagine the positive impact on your health and happiness!

How to begin? Just move and be consistent! It takes 21 days to establish a habit. Banish elevators, escalators and people movers from your life; walk to lunch; park further out every time you park your car; march in place when watching TV during commercials; take a quick walk around the block before taking your morning shower; pace while talking on the phone; schedule walking meetings; take a 15 minute catch-up walk with your partner after work; walk with your children and listen to their music with them; listen to a book on tape while walking; take part in an active volunteer project; cut your own grass; wash dishes by hand with the entire family. At work, enlist the help of your most active employees or co-workers to start a 10,000 steps a day contest – collectively see how far you and your co-workers can walk over the next three months. If you walk 10,000 steps a day (a 4.7 mile-average), you will have walked 1,716 miles in a year. In essence, you will have single-handedly walked to San Diego, Calif. What a feat, or is that feet? This work contest will engage everyone in a friendly competitive game that will enliven the office, build camaraderie and produce healthier employees – all for free!

So what are you waiting for? Athletes and non-athletes alike, track your steps. If you have a smart phone, which of course you do, download one of the free pedometer apps, buy a $15 pedometer at the drug stores or invest in a high-tech pedometer like the FitBit, Nike Fuel Band, or UP Band. No matter where you go, every step you take will lead you in the right direction. I’d enjoy hearing from you about where your steps lead you. Email me at smcgoff@comcast.net to receive a 10,000 steps log sheet or data on converting other activities to number of steps.•

__________

Sharon McGoff is a graduate of Indiana University Maurer School of Law, a certified personal trainer and health fitness specialist with the American College of Sports Medicine, and a certified life and wellness coach with WellCoaches, Inc. She welcomes your questions or comments at Smcgoff@comcast.net. The opinions expressed are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT