ILNews

Living Fit: Maintain No Gain participants stay lean

Sharon McGoff
January 15, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

mcgoffIn November, I wrote about the Indiana State Bar Association’s Maintain No Gain Challenge: gain no more than 2 pounds over the eight-week holiday period. I told you about two eager lawyers who were willing to take the challenge and allow me to coach them along the way. Patty McKinnon and Kerry Hyatt Blomquist are busy lawyers, parents and community volunteers. As you read about Patty and Kerry, think about your actions or inactions during the holidays. Did you allow work, bad weather, numerous social gatherings, mountains of food, ever-flowing libations or travel to adversely affect your exercise, stress level, nutrition or sleep?

If you did, I hope you find inspiration and motivation in their trials and tribulations. I hope you realize anyone can make positive changes to their health, no matter the circumstances that impede your path. I hope you enlist the help of a buddy or coach to help motivate you to gain new habits and lose destructive behaviors.

During the first week, Kerry realized she could not exercise outside after work because of the dark and cold nights, so she begrudgingly changed her schedule to a morning routine of getting on a spin bike at 5:45 a.m., when nothing and no one could interfere with her time. Her biggest struggle was with the food choices during holiday time. She admitted, “no one was stuffing it in my mouth” and that it was up to her to pull away from the temptations: Starbucks introduced a new drink that became a very good friend and there was a variety of savory and rich delicacies at every holiday party she attended, each one begging her to “pick me.”

To make up for the additions to her food repertoire, Kerry increased exercise at the gym and at home. She began using an elliptical trainer that she bought a few years ago and discovered an old TV show (“The West Wing”) that was new to her. She began to lose weight thanks to Martin Sheen. Kerry made changes because she knew Patty and I would be checking with her every week. She finished the challenge with a trip to Europe, which translated into no fitness center and a lot of rich food, but also an increase in drinking water and walking to get around. Kerry gained just one pound from Nov. 20 to Jan. 6.

Patty began the first week of the challenge by exercising more, but wasn’t as careful with what she ate. A week later, her exercise time decreased because of a busy trial calendar, family obligations and numerous parties. Knowing that Kerry and I would be checking in with her, Patty creatively fit exercise into her day. When she took her son to choir practice at Butler, she walked flights of stairs for 45 minutes, keeping an ever-watchful eye on a spider in the stairwell, which made her walk faster through that section of the stairs. (Don’t tell Patty, but I strategically placed the spider there.) Patty also began lifting weights at the gym, something she had not done for months, and happily reported a “good hurt.” Her food choices also improved and she was doing well.

Then, another obstacle threatened to take her off course: Patty’s mom was hospitalized. Patty confided that she eats when stressed, but she was determined to refocus to avoid stressful eating. She ate just one small treat per day and ordered the heart-healthy meals at the hospital. When her mom was discharged, Patty was tempted to eat a fattening fast-food meal, but opted instead for a healthy version of the same, enjoying every bite!

Patty’s biggest hurdle came with a trip to Seattle: airport travel, hotel, eating out and limited exercise. Patty was prepared to do what she could to maintain. While at the airport, she purchased huge bottles of water and walked up and down the concourse before her flights. She took advantage of the elliptical machine at the hotel gym, but ate more than normal at the dreaded “free hot-breakfast buffet.” (I think we have all succumbed to this beast at least once.) Patty gained just 2 pounds from Nov. 20 to Jan. 6, and she is confident she will lose them in the next two weeks as she returns to her regular routine of exercise, nutrition and the addition of a Tai Chi class. She knows the newly fallen snow will not stop her routine because she feels so good to have kept her weight in check this season.

Like most of us, Patty and Kerry said the holidays will always be a challenge due to the plethora of baked goodies, socializing (with food) and interruptions in routine. They said the challenge and reporting to a friend and a coach was an excellent way to stay in control of their weight and wellness because they didn’t eat as much and exercised more than in past years. This is the fittest they have been, post-holidays, than at any other time in their adult lives!

It wasn’t easy for Patty and Kerry to make adjustments to not gain more than 2 pounds. It was a challenge to be challenged during this time of year. They didn’t give up. They gained new healthy habits, new buddies and newfound confidence that they can maintain their weight despite obstacles. They lost the demons of stressful eating, overeating and a sedentary lifestyle during the dark, cold winter. What a sweet payoff! Their experiences bring home so much more that “life” is never really routine and fixed. There are always things that get in the way and try to derail our best intentions, weaken us and throw us under the bus of temptation and bad habits.

Kerry and Patty weren’t going to allow those obstacles to quash their goals! They are looking forward to the second annual Maintain No Gain Challenge and highly recommend it for others. But don’t wait until November, make a pact with a buddy, set up an appointment with a coach, or boldly go solo in your endeavor to gain great health and lose bad habits in 2014, AND plan to sign up for the challenge in November 2014!•

__________

Sharon McGoff is a graduate of Indiana University Maurer School of Law, a certified personal trainer and health fitness specialist with the American College of Sports Medicine, and a certified life and wellness coach with WellCoaches Inc. The opinions expressed are those of the author.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Applause, applause, applause ..... but, is this duty to serve the constitutional order not much more incumbent upon the State, whose only aim is to be pure and unadulterated justice, than defense counsel, who is also charged with gaining a result for a client? I agree both are responsible, but it seems to me that the government attorneys bear a burden much heavier than defense counsel .... "“I note, much as we did in Mechling v. State, 16 N.E.3d 1015 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014), trans. denied, that the attorneys representing the State and the defendant are both officers of the court and have a responsibility to correct any obvious errors at the time they are committed."

  2. Do I have to hire an attorney to get co-guardianship of my brother? My father has guardianship and my older sister was his co-guardian until this Dec 2014 when she passed and my father was me to go on as the co-guardian, but funds are limit and we need to get this process taken care of quickly as our fathers health isn't the greatest. So please advise me if there is anyway to do this our self or if it requires a lawyer? Thank you

  3. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  4. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  5. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

ADVERTISEMENT