ILNews

Living Fit: Maintain No Gain participants stay lean

Sharon McGoff
January 15, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

mcgoffIn November, I wrote about the Indiana State Bar Association’s Maintain No Gain Challenge: gain no more than 2 pounds over the eight-week holiday period. I told you about two eager lawyers who were willing to take the challenge and allow me to coach them along the way. Patty McKinnon and Kerry Hyatt Blomquist are busy lawyers, parents and community volunteers. As you read about Patty and Kerry, think about your actions or inactions during the holidays. Did you allow work, bad weather, numerous social gatherings, mountains of food, ever-flowing libations or travel to adversely affect your exercise, stress level, nutrition or sleep?

If you did, I hope you find inspiration and motivation in their trials and tribulations. I hope you realize anyone can make positive changes to their health, no matter the circumstances that impede your path. I hope you enlist the help of a buddy or coach to help motivate you to gain new habits and lose destructive behaviors.

During the first week, Kerry realized she could not exercise outside after work because of the dark and cold nights, so she begrudgingly changed her schedule to a morning routine of getting on a spin bike at 5:45 a.m., when nothing and no one could interfere with her time. Her biggest struggle was with the food choices during holiday time. She admitted, “no one was stuffing it in my mouth” and that it was up to her to pull away from the temptations: Starbucks introduced a new drink that became a very good friend and there was a variety of savory and rich delicacies at every holiday party she attended, each one begging her to “pick me.”

To make up for the additions to her food repertoire, Kerry increased exercise at the gym and at home. She began using an elliptical trainer that she bought a few years ago and discovered an old TV show (“The West Wing”) that was new to her. She began to lose weight thanks to Martin Sheen. Kerry made changes because she knew Patty and I would be checking with her every week. She finished the challenge with a trip to Europe, which translated into no fitness center and a lot of rich food, but also an increase in drinking water and walking to get around. Kerry gained just one pound from Nov. 20 to Jan. 6.

Patty began the first week of the challenge by exercising more, but wasn’t as careful with what she ate. A week later, her exercise time decreased because of a busy trial calendar, family obligations and numerous parties. Knowing that Kerry and I would be checking in with her, Patty creatively fit exercise into her day. When she took her son to choir practice at Butler, she walked flights of stairs for 45 minutes, keeping an ever-watchful eye on a spider in the stairwell, which made her walk faster through that section of the stairs. (Don’t tell Patty, but I strategically placed the spider there.) Patty also began lifting weights at the gym, something she had not done for months, and happily reported a “good hurt.” Her food choices also improved and she was doing well.

Then, another obstacle threatened to take her off course: Patty’s mom was hospitalized. Patty confided that she eats when stressed, but she was determined to refocus to avoid stressful eating. She ate just one small treat per day and ordered the heart-healthy meals at the hospital. When her mom was discharged, Patty was tempted to eat a fattening fast-food meal, but opted instead for a healthy version of the same, enjoying every bite!

Patty’s biggest hurdle came with a trip to Seattle: airport travel, hotel, eating out and limited exercise. Patty was prepared to do what she could to maintain. While at the airport, she purchased huge bottles of water and walked up and down the concourse before her flights. She took advantage of the elliptical machine at the hotel gym, but ate more than normal at the dreaded “free hot-breakfast buffet.” (I think we have all succumbed to this beast at least once.) Patty gained just 2 pounds from Nov. 20 to Jan. 6, and she is confident she will lose them in the next two weeks as she returns to her regular routine of exercise, nutrition and the addition of a Tai Chi class. She knows the newly fallen snow will not stop her routine because she feels so good to have kept her weight in check this season.

Like most of us, Patty and Kerry said the holidays will always be a challenge due to the plethora of baked goodies, socializing (with food) and interruptions in routine. They said the challenge and reporting to a friend and a coach was an excellent way to stay in control of their weight and wellness because they didn’t eat as much and exercised more than in past years. This is the fittest they have been, post-holidays, than at any other time in their adult lives!

It wasn’t easy for Patty and Kerry to make adjustments to not gain more than 2 pounds. It was a challenge to be challenged during this time of year. They didn’t give up. They gained new healthy habits, new buddies and newfound confidence that they can maintain their weight despite obstacles. They lost the demons of stressful eating, overeating and a sedentary lifestyle during the dark, cold winter. What a sweet payoff! Their experiences bring home so much more that “life” is never really routine and fixed. There are always things that get in the way and try to derail our best intentions, weaken us and throw us under the bus of temptation and bad habits.

Kerry and Patty weren’t going to allow those obstacles to quash their goals! They are looking forward to the second annual Maintain No Gain Challenge and highly recommend it for others. But don’t wait until November, make a pact with a buddy, set up an appointment with a coach, or boldly go solo in your endeavor to gain great health and lose bad habits in 2014, AND plan to sign up for the challenge in November 2014!•

__________

Sharon McGoff is a graduate of Indiana University Maurer School of Law, a certified personal trainer and health fitness specialist with the American College of Sports Medicine, and a certified life and wellness coach with WellCoaches Inc. The opinions expressed are those of the author.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  2. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  3. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  4. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

  5. Seventh Circuit Court Judge Diane Wood has stated in “The Rule of Law in Times of Stress” (2003), “that neither laws nor the procedures used to create or implement them should be secret; and . . . the laws must not be arbitrary.” According to the American Bar Association, Wood’s quote drives home this point: The rule of law also requires that people can expect predictable results from the legal system; this is what Judge Wood implies when she says that “the laws must not be arbitrary.” Predictable results mean that people who act in the same way can expect the law to treat them in the same way. If similar actions do not produce similar legal outcomes, people cannot use the law to guide their actions, and a “rule of law” does not exist.

ADVERTISEMENT