ILNews

Longtime Madison County judge dies

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A longtime Madison County judge died suddenly Wednesday. Judge David W. Hopper, 60, had served as a jurist for a total of 28 years. He spent 22 years as judge of Madison County Courts Division 1 and Superior Court 4. Perhaps his legacy in Madison County will be most felt through his work in the Madison County Drug Court Program.

Madison Superior Judge Dennis Carroll, who had known Judge Hopper since they both took the bench in 1981, said there are a number of legacies in the county as a result of Judge Hopper but the one he was most proud of was drug court.

"His temperament, his style, his empathy, his personality was so well-suited for a problem-solving court like drug court," Judge Carroll said. "He was really able to shine in that environment."

Many graduates of the drug court literally owe their lives to Judge Hopper and many people in Madison County think of him as the drug court judge.

Judge Hopper was first elected in 1980 in Madison County; when he lost an election and was out of office for six years, he worked as Hamilton County Circuit Court Master Commissioner until he was re-elected to the bench in Madison County.

Originally a teacher, Judge Hopper graduated from Indiana University School of Law in 1978. At one time, he was a regular lecturer at the National Judicial College in Reno, Nev., said Judge Carroll. In 2006, he was named the Indiana Correctional Association Judge of the Year. According to his election Web site, Judge Hopper resolved more than 70,000 cases in his time on the bench.

Judge Hopper had just become the chief justice of the county courts this year, which will now revert back to Judge Carroll, who was chief justice last year.

Judge Hopper was also active in his community and church. He was a "gentleman farmer," according to Judge Carroll and would take the week off of the 4-H Fair in Madison County. He also was a leader and deacon at his church.

He is survived by his wife, Durenda Sue Hopper; mother and stepfather, Cathy and Ralph Carlton; sons Hugh David Hopper and Andrew Hopper; four brothers and one sister; three grandchildren; and several nieces and nephews.

Visitation will be from 2 to 8 p.m. March 1 at Rozelle-Johnson Funeral Service, 229 S. Rangeline Road, Anderson, and one hour prior to the March 2 service at Bethany Christian Church, 1920 N. Rangeline Road, Anderson; services begin at 1 p.m.

Memorial contributions may be made to Jail Ministry Chaplaincy Program, Madison County 4-H Association, Fall Creek Christian Church, or Milligan College.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The $320,000 is the amount the school spent in litigating two lawsuits: One to release the report involving John Trimble (as noted in the story above) and one defending the discrimination lawsuit. The story above does not mention the amount spent to defend the discrimination suit, that's why the numbers don't match. Thanks for reading.

  2. $160k? Yesterday the figure was $320k. Which is it Indiana Lawyer. And even more interesting, which well connected law firm got the (I am guessing) $320k, six time was the fired chancellor received. LOL. (From yesterday's story, which I guess we were expected to forget overnight ... "According to records obtained by the Journal & Courier, Purdue spent $161,812, beginning in July 2012, in a state open records lawsuit and $168,312, beginning in April 2013, for defense in a federal lawsuit. Much of those fees were spent battling court orders to release an independent investigation by attorney John Trimble that found Purdue could have handled the forced retirement better")

  3. The numbers are harsh; 66 - 24 in the House, 40 - 10 in the Senate. And it is an idea pushed by the Democrats. Dead end? Ummm not necessarily. Just need to go big rather than go home. Nuclear option. Give it to the federal courts, the federal courts will ram this down our throats. Like that other invented right of the modern age, feticide. Rights too precious to be held up by 2000 years of civilization hang in the balance. Onward!

  4. I'm currently seeing someone who has a charge of child pornography possession, he didn't know he had it because it was attached to a music video file he downloaded when he was 19/20 yrs old and fought it for years until he couldn't handle it and plead guilty of possession. He's been convicted in Illinois and now lives in Indiana. Wouldn't it be better to give them a chance to prove to the community and their families that they pose no threat? He's so young and now because he was being a kid and downloaded music at a younger age, he has to pay for it the rest of his life? It's unfair, he can't live a normal life, and has to live in fear of what people can say and do to him because of something that happened 10 years ago? No one deserves that, and no one deserves to be labeled for one mistake, he got labeled even though there was no intent to obtain and use the said content. It makes me so sad to see someone I love go through this and it makes me holds me back a lot because I don't know how people around me will accept him...second chances should be given to those under the age of 21 at least so they can be given a chance to live a normal life as a productive member of society.

  5. It's just an ill considered remark. The Sup Ct is inherently political, as it is a core part of government, and Marbury V Madison guaranteed that it would become ever more so Supremely thus. So her remark is meaningless and she just should have not made it.... what she could have said is that Congress is a bunch of lazys and cowards who wont do their jobs so the hard work of making laws clear, oftentimes stops with the Sups sorting things out that could have been resolved by more competent legislation. That would have been a more worthwhile remark and maybe would have had some relevance to what voters do, since voters cant affect who gets appointed to the supremely un-democratic art III courts.

ADVERTISEMENT