ILNews

Lucas: Had a tough day? Escape to the movies!

Kelly Lucas
February 13, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

EidtPerspLucas-sigAt the top of every issue of Indiana Lawyer, we state that this newspaper is “Your Source for Statewide Legal News.” The staff of Indiana Lawyer works diligently to deliver news and information that you can use in your practice of law.

However, you know what they say about “all work and no play… .”

In that spirit, we are diverting from our regular news coverage to bring you advice that we hope will provide insights to planning your leisure time.

With this issue of IL, we begin presenting movie reviews by Indianapolis criminal defense lawyer Bob Hammerle. Bob is known to many lawyers and businesspeople for his passion about cinema and his colorful commentary about the latest shows to hit the theaters. After receiving several phone messages and emails from readers about Bob’s work and the enjoyment his regular movie reviews – delivered several times per week via email – brings to them, I knew this was something we had to check out.
 

hammerle-7-15col.jpg Bob Hammerle, in Keystone Arts Cinema in Indianapolis, sees three or four movies a week. (IL Photo/ Eric Learned)

After being added to the movie review email list, I quickly noticed a couple of things. Bob’s taste in movies didn’t fit my preconceived (probably a bit stereotypical) notion of “what guys like.” His treatment of reviews seemed fair and balanced based on the product, not the type of movie he was seeing. I suppose that is probably the test of a good movie critic and a true aficionado. The number of movie reviews hitting my inbox also surprised me. How, I thought, does a busy lawyer have the time to see all these movies?

“I take it,” Bob told me when I, like others before me, asked him that question. “You have to have an interest other than what you do for a living.”

Find your bliss. You can’t argue with that.

Bob confessed that he has been cursed with a passion for movies since he fell in love with Hayley Mills as a kid. He enjoys all types of films – comedy, suspense and horror, historical and animated films – but oddly, he explains, a good romantic comedy is among his favorites.

“I love romantic movies where one of the people in love has to walk away in order to save them, like ‘Casablanca,’” he said. One of his favorite modern-day romantic comedies is “Silver Linings Playbook.”

Bob began reviewing movies while attending Marian College in the mid-1960s – he’d head to the movie theater when others went out for food – and they’d return to campus for Hammerle O’Rama. He ate the food friends brought back while reviewing the movie for them.

Today, he averages three or four movies per week, and a couple hundred people receive his “Hammerle Movie Review” emails.

“It’s a pity I can’t get the same satisfaction out of a house of worship that I get from a movie theater,” he said, “I’d be one of the world’s great holy men.”

We hope you enjoy reading Bob’s take on the movies and that it may even inspire you to take a well-deserved break and see a few. Consider the advice of one of my all-time favorite movie characters, Ferris Bueller. “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.”

We’ve included a portion of Bob’s Oscar picks, as well as a sampling of his reviews, in this issue, and we’ll continue to bring you Hammerle’s hits and misses in the weeks ahead. For a complete listing of his Oscar picks and many more reviews, visit Bob’s website – www.bigmouthbobs.com.

Maybe I’ll see you at the movies!•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT