ILNews

Lucas: Trial reports give glimpse into litigation strategies

January 4, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

EidtPerspLucas-sigNot so long ago, trial reports were a popular element in the Indiana Lawyer. They provide litigators the opportunity to share success stories and relay some of the unique issues that arise and arguments that are made in what might otherwise be considered routine cases. Every lawsuit has a story, and through trial reports, lawyers have the opportunity to convey those to their peers.

Over time, the number of trial reports the newspaper has received has slowed to what could now be described as a trickle. Sure, the recently released trial court statistics from Indiana’s state courts reveal that the overall number of issues that go to trial has dropped in the last decade, (see more about the trial court statistics in our story on page 1) and that might account for some of the reduction, but I don’t believe that is the primary reason for the decline in submitted trial reports.

Everyone is busy. It is difficult to find time for things that are not required. There are not enough hours in a day – I get that; I live that! But when you are involved in a trial that presents interesting issues or has an outcome that you see as “justice being served,” I hope you will take a moment to submit a trial report. It is as easy as visiting www.theIndianaLawyer.com and selecting the green “submit” tab, followed by the “submit a trial report” tab and completing the accompanying form.

We ask you for the facts: case name and number, injuries incurred, bench or jury trial, disposition/awards, etc. We’ll give you the opportunity to describe the facts of the case, compelling expert testimony and the arguments made. In the name of accountability, we require the attorney submitting a trial report to send the report to opposing counsel and verify that step has been taken.

Lawyers learn quite a bit from the experiences of their professional peers. By reading about cases similar to their own, they learn how other courts are ruling on a particular issue. By reading about trial strategies, techniques and experts used, they gain valuable insights – strategies they may employ in the future.

The Indiana Lawyer would like to revive the trial report section of the newspaper in 2012. I encourage you to submit your reports. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at klucas@ibj.com or 317-472-5233.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT