Magnus-Stinson takes helm as chief of Indiana’s Southern District

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

When Jane Magnus-Stinson isn’t presiding over cases in one of the busiest federal district courts in the nation, she seems to be just as busy.

chief-magnusstinsoninside-15col.jpg Jane Magnus-Stinson (IL Photo/Eric Learned)

There’s committee work — serving her alma maters on the Butler University board of trustees and the Board of Visitors at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law; and serving the United States Courts’ public defender committee, its budget subcommittee, and multiple ad hoc committees of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. She also finds time for her college-age kids, friends, exercise, singing at church, occasional travel, and a couple of book clubs.

But her workload just increased. On Nov. 23, Magnus-Stinson began her seven-year appointment as chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

“Just more, that’s what I’m doing,” she said in an interview. “I call it next judge up, and I’m the next judge up.”

Leading by consensus

Magnus-Stinson takes over as chief judge following the expiration of Judge Richard Young’s term as top judge.

“Even though my colleagues didn’t vote for me,” she joked, “I know they’ll support me.”

By statute, Magnus-Stinson becomes chief as the most-senior judge who hasn’t served and who is 65 years old or less. She noted that in addition to Young, senior judges Sarah Evans Barker and Larry McKinney also have served as chief and continue to participate in court governance.

“My predecessor, Judge Young, has given me a great example in terms of consensus-building,” she said. “We generally run by consensus and it would be my hope we continued to operate in that way.”

But the buck stops with the chief judge in many respects. She’ll have ultimate authority for budgeting and personnel decisions, and she’s the executive to whom the clerk and chief probation officer report.

She speaks for the court and is the face of the court during public functions. She also will attend meetings of chief judges from around the country.

Magnus-Stinson said the court is aided by excellent staff, but she singled out one. “We have probably the highest-functioning district court clerk in the United States of America in Laura Briggs,” she said. “It’s a huge blessing and a huge relief to any chief judge to know we have such a competent clerk.”

Boosting pro bono

Magnus-Stinson assumes the duties of chief just after the court in October implemented Local Rule 87, better known as the mandatory pro bono rule. When lawyers don’t volunteer to represent indigent litigants, most often prisoners, the rule allows the court to appoint counsel to represent them. She said more work needs to be done to get lawyers to take these cases.

“I would say, no, we’re not getting enough volunteers, and so consequently, it’s good that we have the rule,” she said, noting it was adopted in response to 7th Circuit remands insisting on court-appointed representation of prisoners in certain types of cases.

“I want lawyers to realize that it isn’t every case” where a lawyer is appointed, Magnus-Stinson said. “We have hundreds of cases that would be potentially eligible, but we screen them” so that only those where a lawyer is clearly needed are appointed.

Since adoption of the rule, she said, the court has appointed lawyers in 84 cases, and reached out to more than 100 in an effort to gain representation in those cases. There have been three appointments under Rule 87 where no attorney volunteered to take the case. She said prisoner cases are among the fastest-growing case types and represent “the largest single slice of the pie” that district court judges are handling.

Magnus-Stinson likened the pro bono requirement to jury duty. “If you take a case, you get kicked off the wheel for a while,” she said. “Once (lawyers) serve, they feel very rewarded.”

Getting busier

Indiana’s Southern District had the seventh-highest number of total case filings and fourth-highest number of civil filings of any of the 94 district courts for the year ending June 30, 2016. Meanwhile, the court has waited for more than two years for the appointment of a jurist to succeed Sarah Evans Barker, who took senior judge status in June 2014.

“The court is in a state of emergency according to the (U.S. Courts) Administrative Office,” Magnus-Stinson said. “We’ve been, according to weighted caseload measures set up by the Administrative Office, short a judge for 20 years, but it’s highly unlikely we’ll get a new judgeship created.”

And it also appears unlikely the U.S. Senate will appoint President Barack Obama’s nominee to succeed Barker, Assistant U.S. Attorney Winfield Ong, despite his endorsement by both Indiana senators and his approval by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“It looks like it will be another year or so before we get someone else on board,” Young said.

“Other than communicate our needs to the people with authority, there’s really nothing we can do,” Magnus-Stinson said.

Times of change

Young said he’s known Magnus-Stinson for more than 20 years. “Everything she’s ever done, she’s done well,” he said. “She’ll do a fantastic job.”

It was during Young’s term as chief that Magnus-Stinson was sworn in as a district court judge in June 2010, filling McKinney’s seat after he assumed senior judge status. She was among eight new jurists in the Southern District under Young’s tenure as chief. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt also was appointed in June 2010 to succeed Judge David Hamilton upon his appointment to the 7th Circuit; three new bankruptcy judges were appointed; and three new magistrates were named.

Young’s tenure also brought budget cuts of sequestration during the economic downturn. “A lot of courts around the country had to lay off a lot of people,” he said. “We were able to avoid that,” by not filling staff vacancies, forgoing IT expenses and running a bare-bones enterprise.

“Part of the job of the chief judge is to encourage people to continue to work hard, that things will get better, and they did,” he said. “We’re finally up to a good funding level from the Congress.”

With so much on her plate, Magnus-Stinson said she’d found some words of wisdom in one of her book club selections, Dan Harris’ “10% Happier,” which encourages busy professionals to discover the benefits of mindfulness and meditation.

“Respond, don’t react,” she said. “I like that. “It’s a great judge skill.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

  2. GMA Ranger, I, too, was warned against posting on how the Ind govt was attempting to destroy me professionally, and visit great costs and even destitution upon my family through their processing. No doubt the discussion in Indy today is likely how to ban me from this site (I expect I soon will be), just as they have banned me from emailing them at the BLE and Office of Bar Admission and ADA coordinator -- or, if that fails, whether they can file a complaint against my Kansas or SCOTUS law license for telling just how they operate and offering all of my files over the past decade to any of good will. The elitist insiders running the Hoosier social control mechanisms realize that knowledge and a unified response will be the end of their unjust reign. They fear exposure and accountability. I was banned for life from the Indiana bar for questioning government processing, that is, for being a whistleblower. Hoosier whistleblowers suffer much. I have no doubt, Gma Ranger, of what you report. They fear us, but realize as long as they keep us in fear of them, they can control us. Kinda like the kids' show Ants. Tyrannical governments the world over are being shaken by empowered citizens. Hoosiers dealing with The Capitol are often dealing with tyranny. Time to rise up: Back to the Founders! MAGA!

  3. Science is showing us the root of addiction is the lack of connection (with people). Criminalizing people who are lonely is a gross misinterpretation of what data is revealing and the approach we must take to combat mental health. Harsher crimes from drug dealers? where there is a demand there is a market, so make it legal and encourage these citizens to be functioning members of a society with competitive market opportunities. Legalize are "drugs" and quit wasting tax payer dollars on frivolous incarceration. The system is destroying lives and doing it in the name of privatized profits. To demonize loneliness and destroy lives in the land of opportunity is not freedom.

  4. Good luck, but as I have documented in three Hail Mary's to the SCOTUS, two applications (2007 & 2013),a civil rights suit and my own kicked-to-the-curb prayer for mandamus. all supported in detailed affidavits with full legal briefing (never considered), the ISC knows that the BLE operates "above the law" (i.e. unconstitutionally) and does not give a damn. In fact, that is how it was designed to control the lawyers. IU Law Prof. Patrick Baude blew the whistle while he was Ind Bar Examiner President back in 1993, even he was shut down. It is a masonic system that blackballs those whom the elite disdain. Here is the basic thrust: When I asked why I was initially denied, the court's foremost jester wrote back that the ten examiners all voted, and I did not gain the needed votes for approval (whatever that is, probably ten) and thus I was not in .. nothing written, no explanation, just go away or appeal ... and if you appeal and disagree with their system .. proof positive you lack character and fitness. It is both arbitrary and capricious by its very design. The Hoosier legal elites are monarchical minded, and rejected me for life for ostensibly failing to sufficiently respect man's law (due to my stated regard for God's law -- which they questioned me on, after remanding me for a psych eval for holding such Higher Law beliefs) while breaking their own rules, breaking federal statutory law, and violating federal and state constitutions and ancient due process standards .. all well documented as they "processed me" over many years.... yes years ... they have few standards that they will not bulldoze to get to the end desired. And the ISC knows this, and they keep it in play. So sad, And the fed courts refuse to do anything, and so the blackballing show goes on ... it is the Indy way. My final experience here: I will open my files to anyone interested in seeing justice dawn over Indy. My cases are an open book, just ask.

  5. Looks like 2017 will be another notable year for these cases. I have a Grandson involved in a CHINS case that should never have been. He and the whole family are being held hostage by CPS and the 'current mood' of the CPS caseworker. If the parents disagree with a decision, they are penalized. I, along with other were posting on Jasper County Online News, but all were quickly warned to remove posts. I totally understand that some children need these services, but in this case, it was mistakes, covered by coorcement of father to sign papers, lies and cover-ups. The most astonishing thing was within 2 weeks of this child being placed with CPS, a private adoption agency was asking questions regarding child's family in the area. I believe a photo that was taken by CPS manager at the very onset during the CHINS co-ocerment and the intent was to make money. I have even been warned not to post or speak to anyone regarding this case. Parents have completed all requirements, met foster parents, get visitation 2 days a week, and still the next court date is all the way out till May 1, which gives them(CPS) plenty of to time make further demands (which I expect) No trust of these 'seasoned' case managers, as I have already learned too much about their dirty little tricks. If they discover that I have posted here, I expect they will not be happy and penalized parents again. Still a Hostage.