A Pike County man was arrested by police after they discovered his plan to blow up the county courthouse if he was found
guilty in his trial Wednesday.
Kerry A. Thomas, Oakland City, is charged with Class A felony unlawful possession of a destructive device or explosive to
kill, injure, or to destroy property; and Class C felony unlawful possession of a destructive device.
The Pike County Sheriff's Department executed a search warrant of Thomas' home Nov. 1 because they believed evidence
of the murder of Patrick E. King would be found at Thomas' property. Police were looking for human remains, DNA, a belt
buckle, and anything else that may have indicated Thomas was involved in King's murder when they discovered bomb-making
materials.
Police found PVC pipe, a blasting cap, detonation cord, a cast booster, and a degraded cast booster. Those materials could
be exploded and possibly kill someone by using a household battery, according to the probable cause affidavit.
Allegedly Thomas told at least two people he planned to set off a bomb in the Pike Circuit courtroom to kill himself and
others if he was found guilty at the end of his trial on Wednesday. Thomas was on trial for criminal confinement, intimidation,
pointing a firearm, and battery stemming from an incident in March, according to the Pike County Clerk's Office.
The court documents don't indicate whether anything related to the King case was found on Thomas' property.
A hearing in Thomas' case is set for Nov. 12.














Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!