An accused child molester who sat in jail for 2 1/2 years until his case was dismissed is suing his former public defenders
for legal malpractice.
Donald Woods filed the suit Thursday in federal court against attorneys Bradley B. Jacobs and Leslie D. Merkley alleging
legal malpractice because the two didn't question or investigate the allegation that Woods had inserted 4 feet of
weed-eater wire into his estranged son's penis eight years earlier.
The suit Donald Woods v. New Albany Police Dept., et al., No. 4:10-cv-0002, was filed in the U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division. Woods is seeking $5 million under the Indiana Tort Claims Act.
Woods was charged with Class A felonies child molesting and criminal deviate conduct in July 2006 following allegations from
his estranged wife that Woods inserted the wire into their son's body when he was only five years old in 1998, the last
time he had any contact with his wife or son.
The wire was discovered when his son had a CT scan of his pelvis following a fall in 2006.
Jacobs and Merkley were assigned back-to-back as public defenders for Woods; in his suit, Woods claims neither attorney visited
him in jail and never questioned how his son could live eight years with the wire inside of him without any physical problems.
Woods' third public defender, Jennifer Culotta, obtained medical records in November 2008 and discovered the son had a
CT scan on the same area in 2005 and there was no wire inside of him then.
The case was dismissed against Woods in March 2009 but he wasn't released from jail until December 2009.
In addition to his legal malpractice claims, Woods is suing the New Albany Police Department, Detective Sherri Knight, Clark
County Sheriff's Department, Clark County Prosecutor Steven D. Stewart, and deputy prosecutor Shelley Marble for violations
of his Fourth Amendment rights, malicious prosecution, false arrest, and false imprisonment.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.