Man's conviction for 1989 rape vacated

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Lake Superior Court has vacated the conviction and dismissed the charges against a Gary man who was wrongly punished for a 1989 rape and served his full sentence.

Roosevelt Glenn was one of five men accused of abducting and raping a woman in Hammond. Only Glenn and Darryl Pinkins were convicted despite questionable evidence. Pinkins was sentenced to 65 years but walked out of prison a free man in April 2016 after his conviction was vacated and the charges dismissed. Glenn was sentenced to 35 years and was released in 2009.
On Jan. 30, Temporary Judge T. Edward Page granted Glenn’s petition for post-conviction relief, which requested that the defendant’s judgment of conviction and sentence be vacated based on newly discovered evidence. With the order, Glenn is no longer a convicted rapist.

Both Glenn and Pinkins had their cases picked up by the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney Wrongful Conviction Clinic. Professor Fran Watson and her students represented the pair beginning in 1999 after received a referral from the Innocence Project.

None of the DNA evidence left at the scene of the rape matched either Glenn or Pinkins. Instead the men were convicted by slim evidence, including the victim’s single identification made five months after the crime, testimony based on a faulty hair comparison and the use of serology inclusion evidence.  

Glenn’s first request for post-conviction relief was denied by Page in June 2008. However with Watson’s help, he was able to continue his legal challenge and convince the Indiana Court of Appeals to allow the process to move forward based on claims of new DNA technology and actual innocence.

The CBS news show, “48 Hours,” will profile Pinkins and Glenn on Feb. 4, highlighting the more than 15 years of work by the IU McKinney team.  


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Is it possible to amend an order for child support due to false paternity?

  2. He did not have an "unlicensed handgun" in his pocket. Firearms are not licensed in Indiana. He apparently possessed a handgun without a license to carry, but it's not the handgun that is licensed (or registered).

  3. Once again, Indiana's legislature proves how friendly it is to monopolies. This latest bill by Hershman demonstrates the lengths Indiana's representatives are willing to go to put big business's (especially utilities') interests above those of everyday working people. Maassal argues that if the technology (solar) is so good, it will be able to compete on its own. Too bad he doesn't feel the same way about the industries he represents. Instead, he wants to cut the small credit consumers get for using solar in order to "add a 'level of certainty'" to his industry. I haven't heard of or seen such a blatant money-grab by an industry since the days when our federal, state, and local governments were run by the railroad. Senator Hershman's constituents should remember this bill the next time he runs for office, and they should penalize him accordingly.

  4. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

  5. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!