ILNews

Marion County to ask Indiana Tax Court to take mall cases

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Marion County is granting Simon Property Group Inc. a $2.4 million refund, after a tax review board cut the value of two ailing malls roughly in half.

Simon prevailed before the Indiana Board of Tax Review in each of two cases, which covered Lafayette Square Mall and Washington Square Mall for multiple years.

“We were surprised it went completely their way,” Marion County Assessor Joseph O’Connor said. In each case, the review board chose Simon’s values over the county’s, rather than arriving at an in-between value, which is also an option.

O’Connor plans to appeal both decisions to the Indiana Tax Court, but said Simon will get its refund in the meantime because he doesn’t want to risk racking up interest charges while cases are pending.

The two malls’ declines are well-documented, but the county and Simon were nowhere close to agreement in their appraisals.

Marion County had valued Lafayette Square at $35 million in 2006, for example, while Simon argued it was worth $15 million.

Likewise, the county’s appraiser valued Washington Square at $22 million for 2006, while Simon’s appraiser pegged it at $12 million.

The lowest value that Indianapolis-based Simon presented for Washington Square was $9.5 million for 2010.

Located in older Marion County suburbs, the malls have about four decades behind them. Lafayette Square opened in 1968 at Lafayette Road and West 38th Street, and Washington Square opened in 1974 on East Washington Street.

Simon didn’t build either mall, but acquired them in 1996 through its $1.6 billion purchase of Ohio-based DeBartolo Realty.

Household spending power in both areas has declined, especially around Lafayette Square. Simon took its name off the mall in 2005 and sold it in 2007 to New York-based Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp. for $18 million.

Simon still owns Washington Square. Though Simon’s appraiser made a strong case that it will continue to decline, spokesman Les Morris said the company hasn’t turned its back on the property.

“We’re very actively leasing it and managing it,” he said. “It’s a solid area.”

The three-member tax review board handed down its decision on Washington Square, which covered 2006 through 2010, in September. The ruling on Lafayette Square, for 2006 and 2007, came out Oct. 3.

Simon’s arguments don’t appear to have swayed the county’s current assessments – $22.9 million for Lafayette Square and $24.9 million on Washington Square.

As long as an assessor calculates new values each year, the taxpayer has to start the appeals process from scratch, said Larry Stroble, a partner at Barnes & Thornburg who was not involved in the Simon appeals.

The depressed state of commercial real estate could give the mall owners a strong incentive to pursue more appeals.

“All major owners of commercial real estate are monitoring their expense levels as closely as they can,” said James Sullivan, managing director and senior analyst covering real estate companies for Cowen Group in New York. “It’s certainly been, over the last couple of years, a pretty active part of many of these companies’ strategies.”

The $2.4 million, which doesn’t include interest, is a relatively small figure for Simon, which is the world’s largest real estate company and has revenue topping $4.5 billion. While Marion County is strapped for cash, it will have no problem writing the check, said Richard Hunter, director of settlements for the Marion County auditor.

Marion County has refunded $20 million to $40 million in property taxes a year since the state-mandated reassessment of 2007, Hunter said. The county has made multimillion-dollar refunds to other prominent companies, including Eli Lilly and Co.

Sometimes it pays to let a property go back to the bank, Sullivan said. If a property is worth less than the mortgage, writing off that liability increases a company’s book value, he said.

“Just about all owners of retail real estate will have this circumstance occur,” he said.

O’Connor will be making his appeal on a shoestring budget. One reason it’s even feasible, he said, is that one of his analysts, John Slatten, is also an attorney and CPA who can dedicate his time to the cases.

Marion County has defended appeals before the tax court, but O’Connor said he can’t remember the last time the county carried the burden of proof as petitioner.

“I feel lucky to have such great people,” O’Connor said. “I’ll put a so-called government worker up against private industry people any day.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT