ILNews

Maurer law school to host IP colloquium

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Beginning Thursday, five distinguished scholars from around the world will share their work during the Center for Intellectual Property Research IP Colloquium at Indiana University Maurer School of Law in Bloomington.

The “Protecting Intellectual Property: A Global Perspective” colloquium will focus on recent developments in IP law in the U.S. and other countries. The first speaker is Mira Sundara Rajan, an independent scholar, IP consultant and honorary member, Magdalen College, Oxford University. Her Sept. 8 talk is titled “Authors or Auteurs? Moral Rights in Film.”

Carys Craig of Osgoode Hall Law School at York University will speak Sept. 22 on “Copyright, Communication, and IP Culture: Towards a Relational Theory of Copyright Law.” On Oct. 13, Pierre-Emmanuel Moyse of McGill University Faculty of Law will speak on “Intellectual Property Rights and ‘Abuse of Rights’ Theory, a Jurisprudential Inquiry.” Peter Yu of Drake University Law School will discuss “The Graduated Response” during his Oct. 27 presentation; and Daniel Gervais of Vanderbilt Law School will examine “The Changing Landscape of Collective Rights Management” during his Nov. 3 presentation.

All talks are from 1:30 to 3:25 p.m. in Room 213 of the law school. Continuing legal education credit has been applied for and the public is welcome to attend. More information can be found on the Center for Intellectual Property Research’s website.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. He did not have an "unlicensed handgun" in his pocket. Firearms are not licensed in Indiana. He apparently possessed a handgun without a license to carry, but it's not the handgun that is licensed (or registered).

  2. Once again, Indiana's legislature proves how friendly it is to monopolies. This latest bill by Hershman demonstrates the lengths Indiana's representatives are willing to go to put big business's (especially utilities') interests above those of everyday working people. Maassal argues that if the technology (solar) is so good, it will be able to compete on its own. Too bad he doesn't feel the same way about the industries he represents. Instead, he wants to cut the small credit consumers get for using solar in order to "add a 'level of certainty'" to his industry. I haven't heard of or seen such a blatant money-grab by an industry since the days when our federal, state, and local governments were run by the railroad. Senator Hershman's constituents should remember this bill the next time he runs for office, and they should penalize him accordingly.

  3. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

  4. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!

  5. @ Rebecca D Fell, I am very sorry for your loss. I think it gives the family solace and a bit of closure to go to a road side memorial. Those that oppose them probably did not experience the loss of a child or a loved one.

ADVERTISEMENT