ILNews

MCBA to host membership drive

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Marion County Bar Association is continuing to advance its mission with a special event to reconnect with past members and welcome new members.

The organization will host a membership drive from 5:30 to 8 p.m. Sept. 4, at the Indianapolis Propylaeum, 1410 N. Delaware St., Indianapolis.

The event, MCBA Membership Drive: Advancing Our Future – Reclaiming Our Past, will provide an opportunity to network and learn about ways to help advance the association’s mission. Also, attendees can explore MCBA’s programs like mentoring students at Shortridge Magnet High School for Law and Public Policy students.

“Today, the MCBA seeks to encourage diversity in the Indianapolis legal community and promote truth, justice and fairness through education, professional development and community involvement,” said Cassandra Bentley McNair, association president. “In order to do that, the MCBA hopes to use the membership drive to raise awareness about the organization and encourage like-minded individuals to become active in its efforts.”

The membership drive is free but reservations are requested. RSVP by email to mcba@mcbaindy.org.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Recipe for disaster
    I see that the Congressional Black Caucus is attempting lead their constituents into agreement, in effect, with the MCBA's statement that thousands of police are targeting AA men, for murder, due to race. This well over the top statement, coupled to activists threatening to kill white cops, coupled to a new phone app that allegedly identifies the places where racist cops are found, is so very troubling. America, America, God shed His Grace on thee .... are we throwing it all away to make political points, points made in a fashion that may very well result in the assassination of some or our nation's finest, black and white? "Caught in the middle are blacks working in law enforcement. There were an estimated 55,267 African-Americans in local police departments and an additional 15,500 in sheriff’s departments in 2007, the latest information available from the Justice Department. “We’re called things like Uncle Toms and traitors to our community, in spite of the fact that we sympathize or we agree with the anger that our community holds, because we feel that same anger,” said Noel Leader, a retired New York City police sergeant who in 1995 co-founded an advocacy group, 100 Blacks In Law Enforcement Who Care." http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2014/12/11/black-officer-im-called-uncle-tom/ I must ask ..... will the MCBA recall, before someone is killed for such emotional rather than factual sentiments, the following incendiary statement that it recently issued: "“This situation is not just about the death of Michael Brown, but the thousands of other African-Americans who are disproportionately targeted and killed by police officers.”
    • Diversity calling
      If the MCBA wants to have a speaker in with a diverse viewpoint, and one that can really call a nation to action, and their association to a greater purpose, maybe even greater membership, certainly to greater relevance, then I humbly suggest this fine man, who brings an alternative perspective to the MCBA's call to street protest ala Rerguson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B092acMImJE
    • Almost mea culpa
      When I posted this I did not realize that the Marion County Bar Association was a group that historically defined itself by race, and in particular as follows: "The Marion County Bar Association is an affiliate chapter of the National Bar Association that has historically served the needs of African-American attorneys in the Indianapolis area since 1925. Today, the MCBA seeks to encourage diversity in the Indianapolis legal community ..." Had I known that history I likely would not have posted the comment below in response to its call for the following: “While we share in the public’s outrage, the MCBA does not condone the violence that a small minority of protesters have resorted to,” the association’s statement continued. “However, the majority of the protests have been peaceful, and we stand with those who are exercising their First Amendment rights to protest the actions of their government.” I wrongly assumed the MCBA to be a race neutral and fully integrated organization representing the majority of attorneys in Indy. My ignorance has been cured. Being white, racial preferences and set asides is not an option for me, and so it is not my default when thinking about other groups. I just assume full integration, as it is easy for me to do. I apologize if my comment came off as racially insensitive. It was not intended so, but rather was intended as a comment the wrongheadedness of the MCBA encouraging events like those taking place in Feguson in response to due process of the law and nearly sacred procedures dating back to Magna Carta. IMHO the results of grand jury failures to indict should not results in mass protests, and lawyers should not encourage the same. Change the law if need be, set up test cases, but mass protests based upon individual cases .... not causes, but individual cases ... lawyers of any color should not encourage, at least by my lights. It is a path toward lawlessness.
      • Seeking grants
        Will the MCBA be offering any mentoring in fomenting public protests over legal process that is seemingly unfair into full fledged riots and pre-Christmas looting?

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
      1. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

      2. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

      3. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

      4. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

      5. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

      ADVERTISEMENT