ILNews

Mediation by monitor

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

Property owners in Durham, N.C., upset about their tax bills now can go online and challenge them – often with a satisfactory result – without ever talking to anyone in county offices.

New Yorkers with insurance disputes soon will have them resolved in the cloud.

Those are just two examples of how online dispute resolution is changing and broadening the scope of mediation and arbitration. Where some see the awakening of a disruptive technology, others see an opportunity for mediators to assist in resolving a greater number of disputes.

“We believe we are going to bring more and more disputes to the mediation process and alternative dispute resolution professionals,” said Scott Carr, president and CEO of three-year-old Silicon Valley startup Modria. While there are other players in the marketplace such as Rezoud Corp. and Youstice, Modria appears to have become to online dispute resolution what Google is to Internet search engines.

henderson Henderson

Modria received a $5 million round of venture capital funding last year and since has parlayed that into contracts with municipalities including Durham County, N.C.; and agencies such as the American Arbitration Association, which processes more than 100,000 New York No Fault insurance disputes annually. The association announced that this quarter it will begin using Modria’s platform to mediate disputes.

In its short existence, Modria already claims to have processed more than 400 million disputes.

“I think it will be a necessary part of the skill set that mediators will need to do their work,” Ethan Katsh said of online dispute resolution. Katsh chairs the Modria board of advisors and is co-founder of the Center for Information Technology and Dispute Resolution at the University of Massachusetts.

From giant roots

Colin Rule and Chittu Nagarajan co-founded Modria and hold leadership positions in the company. Both have backgrounds in ADR and worked to develop the online dispute resolution systems at online commerce giants eBay and PayPal. Because of their sheer volume of customers, those companies had to learn to efficiently handle disputes to build trustworthy reputations.

Modria’s co-founders “really dedicated their careers to how to apply Internet technology to resolve disputes,” Carr said. Because eBay and PayPal had developed systems that were capable of resolving 90 percent of complaints without intervention of a neutral party, the founders believed the same strategies could be applied to a wider variety of disputes.

“The market itself is large. We estimate 1 to 3 percent of all transactions online and offline result in some dispute,” Carr said. Companies and organizations typically have in-house systems to deal with dissatisfied customers, but Carr believes those systems can gain efficiency and better resolve disputes through an always-accessible online platform.

“We’re all used to anytime, anywhere access to services and products, and we find disputes fall into the same category,” he said. “I don’t want to wait till 9 a.m. Monday,” to lodge a complaint.

People who use Modria’s dispute resolution platforms may never realize it, Carr said. For instance, the Durham, N.C., homeowner with a tax bill beef will go to the county’s website and use forms that Modria has developed for the county. The taxpayer also has the option of uploading exhibits and supporting information for an appeal.

The data is stored securely on cloud servers. In cases where online resolution isn’t possible, neutral mediators or arbitrators get involved, and the initial paper trail from the Web-based complaint will be available.

“What’s happening is we’re building an electronic case file,” Carr said. And in the case of government workers in Durham, their time is freed to focus on tougher tax-appeal cases that may be likelier to wind up in litigation.

Modria doesn’t currently have any clients in Indiana, but it’s pitching to them.

“I can think of many government agencies in Indiana that can benefit from online dispute resolution systems,” said Modria adviser Ruel Williamson, who has been in discussions with officials from public and private organizations in the state. Along with property tax appeals, he said public-health service claims and business-license disputes also could be well served.

“Many government agencies have taken the first step by allowing people to file claims and processes online,” Williamson said. “The next step is to fully embrace an online dispute resolution methodology that helps take a filing through resolution.”

What lies ahead?

Unresolved for alternative dispute resolution professionals is whether Modria and other online dispute resolution companies will bring new sources of business or undercut the work mediators currently do.

Rezoud, a St. Petersburg, Fla.-based startup, announced in March a proprietary “technology-enhanced dispute resolution” system that it promoted as a “disruptive innovation.”

“Dispute resolution and legal industries have become monolithic, ineffective, time-consuming, costly and non-consumer friendly,” the company said in a news release.

Indiana University Maurer School of Law Professor Bill Henderson has written about Modria and online dispute resolution’s portent for ADR, but he doesn’t quite envision such a sea change. “It’s a breakthrough when you think about it.”

A huge number of disputes don’t get resolved because of the small underlying value, Henderson said, and he sees Modria and others opening this latent market. “These are kind of low-stakes, highly voluminous types of transactions where disputes are going to arise,” he said.

Henderson said the minds behind Modria ran with protocols developed through the Harvard Negotiation Workshop, which found some near-universal bases for dispute resolution. “If we follow a few simple rules, most disputes go away,” Henderson said of the Harvard protocols.

It’s human nature to complain, pleasing when a complaint is heard, and rewarding when it’s resolved. “People are predictable,” Henderson said. “We think we’re special snowflakes.”

Simply asking a complainant what would make her happy can resolve a good number of complaints quickly and without complication, for example. Responses also may help organizations improve their processes and customer satisfaction.

Katsh said ADR practitioners should find Modria useful. “It will increase their effectiveness,” he said. “Technology, in general, in all our lives has provided something new that we have to live with; and a lot of it is complicated, and a lot of it is empowering.

“I think Modria has the technology to handle more disputes than any previous dispute resolution company, so it has a large investment in technology, and there’s a need for this technology,” Katsh said.

Henderson likened Modria’s entrance into ADR to an emergency room triage setting: The most serious cases are going to require the most personal attention. Modria and other online dispute resolution providers are situated to take care of those that just might need an aspirin or bandage, he said.

But he also noted that venture capitalists have been very receptive of Modria’s platform and promise.

“What maybe lawyers should be thinking about is Modria might move upstream and begin to eat into the business a little bit more over time,” Henderson said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Call it unauthorized law if you must, a regulatory wrong, but it was fraud and theft well beyond that, a seeming crime! "In three specific cases, the hearing officer found that Westerfield did little to no work for her clients but only issued a partial refund or no refund at all." That is theft by deception, folks. "In its decision to suspend Westerfield, the Supreme Court noted that she already had a long disciplinary history dating back to 1996 and had previously been suspended in 2004 and indefinitely suspended in 2005. She was reinstated in 2009 after finally giving the commission a response to the grievance for which she was suspended in 2004." WOW -- was the Indiana Supreme Court complicit in her fraud? Talk about being on notice of a real bad actor .... "Further, the justices noted that during her testimony, Westerfield was “disingenuous and evasive” about her relationship with Tope and attempted to distance herself from him. They also wrote that other aggravating factors existed in Westerfield’s case, such as her lack of remorse." WOW, and yet she only got 18 months on the bench, and if she shows up and cries for them in a year and a half, and pays money to JLAP for group therapy ... back in to ride roughshod over hapless clients (or are they "marks") once again! Aint Hoosier lawyering a great money making adventure!!! Just live for the bucks, even if filthy lucre, and come out a-ok. ME on the other hand??? Lifetime banishment for blowing the whistle on unconstitutional governance. Yes, had I ripped off clients or had ANY disciplinary history for doing that I would have fared better, most likely, as that it would have revealed me motivated by Mammon and not Faith. Check it out if you doubt my reading of this, compare and contrast the above 18 months with my lifetime banishment from court, see appendix for Bar Examiners report which the ISC adopted without substantive review: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS

  2. Wow, over a quarter million dollars? That is a a lot of commissary money! Over what time frame? Years I would guess. Anyone ever try to blow the whistle? Probably not, since most Hoosiers who take notice of such things realize that Hoosier whistleblowers are almost always pilloried. If someone did blow the whistle, they were likely fired. The persecution of whistleblowers is a sure sign of far too much government corruption. Details of my own personal experience at the top of Hoosier governance available upon request ... maybe a "fake news" media outlet will have the courage to tell the stories of Hoosier whistleblowers that the "real" Hoosier media (cough) will not deign to touch. (They are part of the problem.)

  3. So if I am reading it right, only if and when African American college students agree to receive checks labeling them as "Negroes" do they receive aid from the UNCF or the Quaker's Educational Fund? In other words, to borrow from the Indiana Appellate Court, "the [nonprofit] supposed to be [their] advocate, refers to [students] in a racially offensive manner. While there is no evidence that [the nonprofits] intended harm to [African American students], the harm was nonetheless inflicted. [Black students are] presented to [academia and future employers] in a racially offensive manner. For these reasons, [such] performance [is] deficient and also prejudice[ial]." Maybe even DEPLORABLE???

  4. I'm the poor soul who spent over 10 years in prison with many many other prisoners trying to kill me for being charged with a sex offense THAT I DID NOT COMMIT i was in jail for a battery charge for helping a friend leave a boyfriend who beat her I've been saying for over 28 years that i did not and would never hurt a child like that mine or anybody's child but NOBODY wants to believe that i might not be guilty of this horrible crime or think that when i say that ALL the paperwork concerning my conviction has strangely DISAPPEARED or even when the long beach judge re-sentenced me over 14 months on a already filed plea bargain out of another districts court then had it filed under a fake name so i could not find while trying to fight my conviction on appeal in a nut shell people are ALWAYS quick to believe the worst about some one well I DID NOT HURT ANY CHILD EVER IN MY LIFE AND HAVE SAID THIS FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS please if anybody can me get some kind of justice it would be greatly appreciated respectfully written wrongly accused Brian Valenti

  5. A high ranking Indiana supreme Court operative caught red handed leading a group using the uber offensive N word! She must denounce or be denounced! (Or not since she is an insider ... rules do not apply to them). Evidence here: http://m.indianacompanies.us/friends-educational-fund-for-negroes.364110.company.v2#top_info

ADVERTISEMENT