Jason Cole Sr., as Personal Representative of the Estates of Patricia Harris Cole and Baby Jason Cole Jr. v. Joseph M.
Smith, M.D.
Wayne Circuit Court No. 89C01–0103-CT001
Injuries: Wrongful death of 34-week-old fetus
Date: March 26, 2010
Judge or Jury Trial: Jury trial
Judge: Hon. David Kolger
Disposition: $1.1 million
Plaintiff Attorneys: Jason R. Reese and Stephen M. Wagner, Wagner Reese & Crossen
Defendant Attorneys: Kirk Bagrowski and Louis Voelker, Eichhorn & Eichhorn
Insurance: Pro Assurance
Case Information: A Wayne County jury returned a verdict of $1.1 million in favor of the plaintiff and against
a Richmond OB/GYN in this medical malpractice action. It was a 5-day jury trial before Judge David Kolger. The plaintiff,
Jason Cole Sr., claimed that the defendant failed to comply with the applicable standard of medical care and that his negligence
was a factor in causing the death of baby Jason Cole Jr. (then 34-weeks gestation).
The issues facing the jury were: (1) whether the defendant was negligent in ordering a “stress test” a/k/a OCT
test in lieu of a non-stress test a/k/a a biophysical profile; (2) whether any act or omission by the defendant caused the
death of the infant; and (3) whether baby Jason was born alive or stillborn.
The defendant argued that the OCT test met the standard of care, the alleged acts of the defendant did not cause the death
of the infant, and the infant was stillborn, thus limiting any damages to emotional distress of the mother only.
The defense made no settlement offers.
Just before trial plaintiff offered to settle all claims for $100,000.
The case involved the death of a 34-week-old baby when the mom presented to Reid Hospital on Jan. 27, 2001, complaining of
lower abdominal pain, lower back pain, and decreased fetal movement.
The experts agreed that pathology showed mom had a severe placental abruption which began before her presentation to the
hospital. All of the experts and the three treating doctors agreed that the baby was alive, but in danger, when mom presented
to the hospital.
The defendant did not review the entire chart which indicated “possible fetal compromise,” but instead testified
that he obtained his information directly from the nurse, the mom, and other treating doctor. Despite the non-reassuring fetal
heart rate tracings, he ordered the stress test instead of a non-stress test.
The defense expert, Dr. David Kiley, testified that there was no deviation in the standard of care by the defendant and that,
even if there were, there was nothing that could have been done to change the outcome – the baby would have died anyway
as a result of the severe placenta abruption that had existed long before mom presented to the hospital.
The jury deliberated for 2 hours, 15 minutes before rendering a verdict.
Even more tragic was the fact the baby’s mother was never able to see justice through the legal system. On July 14,
2006, approximately 5 1/2 years after her baby died, Patricia Harris Cole died in an unrelated car accident in Richmond. This
made presentation of damages very difficult. “Trish” is survived by her husband, Jason Cole Sr., and her three
other children.•
– Jason R. Reese














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.