Monarch affiliate gets OK to sell liquor after judge denies stay

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After years of trying, Monarch Beverage Co. affiliate Spirited Sales LLC is now officially distributing alcohol in Indiana—at least for now.

The Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco Commission granted Spirited a temporary permit to sell liquor on a wholesale basis this week after a Marion County Special Court judge denied the state of Indiana’s request for a stay on an August ruling that found the state agency was “arbitrary and capricious” in its decision to deny the company a liquor wholesaling permit back in 2014.

The state is appealing the case, so Spirited may not be permanently in business. The ATC permit is for 30 days or pending another decision of the court. The appeals process could take several months, or even years.

For now, Monarch—Indiana's largest beer and wine distributor—is celebrating.

Spirited CEO Phil Terry, who is also the leader of Monarch Beverage Co., said the decision means that “Spirited is in the liquor business.” He hopes the permit will be extended past 30 days provided there is no court ruling that nullifies it.

Longtime Monarch customer Gallo Winery, which Terry had feared would ditch the company as a client because Monarch can’t distribute liquor under Indiana law, has made Spirited Sales the wholesaler of Gallo's expanding line of liquor products, he said.

“We’re pleased that Spirited is able to begin business,” Terry said. “We have to temper those thoughts with knowing that the case is on appeal. It’s good for now. We’re hoping that everyone recognizes that this is not a bad thing for the public. There will be more competition … and at the end of the day, it won’t be disruptive to the industry.”

Monarch and Spirited have waged a yearslong fight to enter the liquor wholesaling business in Indiana. Under Indiana law, beer wholesalers like Monarch are unable to also distribute liquor.

Spirited is a separate company, but it has a lot in common with Monarch. Besides sharing the same CEO and board of directors, Spirited is wholly owned by E.F. Transit Inc., which provides transportation services to Monarch and other companies. The same shareholders that own Monarch also own EFT .

However, the company’s financial books are separate, they have separate permits, maintain separate insurance, and have separate bank accounts, tax returns and payrolls. That level of separation was enough for a Marion County judge to deny the stay.

The companies’ competitors in the past have argued that if Spirited or Monarch could sell liquor, there is the “potential to do great harm” to the state’s prohibition-era alcohol-distribution system.

Marion County Special Judge Heather Welch stated in a Sept. 23 ruling that the court was “unconvinced that a stay of its [August] judgment would serve the public interest.” She also ruled that Spirited would suffer harm if the stay had been granted.

“Spirited has already had to wait years to process its permit application as a result of the ATC’s actions during the investigation phase, a process which normally takes substantially less time,” Welch wrote.

Welch said the court was not swayed by the argument that Spirited’s competitors—multibillion dollar companies—would be put in harm's way by Spirited.

“This Court finds that any of [Monarch’s] ‘economic might’ to which the ATC claims Spirited has access would not prevent Spirited’s multibillion-dollar competitors, who participated as remonstrators in this case, from competing with Spirited for market share of the liquor wholesaling business in Indiana,” Welch wrote.

A spokesperson for the Indiana Attorney General’s office did not immediately respond to IBJ’s request for comment.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It's an appreciable step taken by the government to curb the child abuse that are happening in the schools. Employees in the schools those are selected without background check can not be trusted. A thorough background check on the teachers or any other other new employees must be performed to choose the best and quality people. Those who are already employed in the past should also be checked for best precaution. The future of kids can be saved through this simple process. However, the checking process should be conducted by the help of a trusted background checking agency(

  2. Almost everything connects to internet these days. From your computers and Smartphones to wearable gadgets and smart refrigerators in your home, everything is linked to the Internet. Although this convenience empowers usto access our personal devices from anywhere in the world such as an IP camera, it also deprives control of our online privacy. Cyber criminals, hackers, spies and everyone else has realized that we don’t have complete control on who can access our personal data. We have to take steps to to protect it like keeping Senseless password. Dont leave privacy unprotected. Check out this article for more ways:

  3. You need to look into Celadon not paying sign on bonuses. We call get the run

  4. My parents took advantage of the fact that I was homeless in 2012 and went to court and got Legal Guardianship I my 2 daughters. I am finally back on my feet and want them back, but now they want to fight me on it. I want to raise my children and have them almost all the time on the weekends. Mynparents are both almost 70 years old and they play favorites which bothers me a lot. Do I have a leg to stand on if I go to court to terminate lehal guardianship? My kids want to live with me and I want to raise them, this was supposed to be temporary, and now it is turning into a fight. Ridiculous

  5. Here's my two cents. While in Texas in 2007 I was not registered because I only had to do it for ten years. So imagine my surprise as I find myself forced to register in Texas because indiana can't get their head out of their butt long enough to realize they passed an ex post facto law in 2006. So because Indiana had me listed as a failure to register Texas said I had to do it there. Now if Indiana had done right by me all along I wouldn't need the aclu to defend my rights. But such is life.