From Laurie Gray's letter to the editor on whether women can have it all.
I was raised in rural Indiana where good wives submit and obey and good children are seen and not heard. I went to college
with the understanding that an educated good woman is a teacher or a nurse. So I became a high school teacher. Then I met
and married a talk, dark and handsome Sikh from Malaysia who told me I should go to law school and get paid to argue all day
so that I could come home in the evenings and perhaps be a little nicer. It was the best unsolicited advice I ever received,
although it didn’t save the marriage. I went to law school and met my current husband, the senior litigator at the second
law firm where I worked. He was 22 years older than I with two adult children. Marrying him would mean working hard, playing
hard, and never having any children of my own. That’s what I decided to do. I left the private practice of law and became
a deputy prosecuting attorney, working at our local child advocacy center, trying mostly rape and child molest cases along
with the occasional aggravated assault and murder. And that’s what I was doing when we most unexpectedly found ourselves
expecting. Our daughter was born a month before my 38th birthday, and two months after my husband’s 60th.
I worked right up through the day my water broke and scheduled a four-day child molest trial for eight weeks after her birth.
I went back and tried that one case, but it was too crazy. I was operating on no sleep and it wasn’t the life my husband
and I wanted for ourselves or our child. So I extended my maternity leave and eventually resigned, only to return when a newly
elected prosecutor offered me the opportunity to work just a half day each week, any day, either half. My mom had just retired
and agreed to watch our daughter, so I gradually went back to work almost full time. Although I worked 40+ hours a week, I
maintained a “part-time” status that gave me more flexibility in scheduling. I left the prosecutor’s office
two years ago when my first young adult novel was released. Summer Sanctuary (Luminis Books / 2010) has earned a Moonbeam
Gold Medal as was named a 2011 Indiana Best Book Finalist. I have two more young adult novels slated for release in 2013 and
2014. I’ve formed my own writing, speaking and consulting company called Socratic Parenting LLC (www.SocraticParenting.com).
I also work as a bilingual forensic interviewer at the Bill Lewis Center for Children and an adjunct professor of criminal
sciences at Indiana Tech. I’ve served on the faculty at the National Symposium on Child Abuse every spring since 2009
and am building my platform and cultivating recognition on a national level.
In 2020 my daughter will graduate from high school, my husband will be 79 and I will be 57. At that point, I will be free
to work as much as I like doing whatever I like. I could go back to private practice, return to prosecuting crimes, become
a full-time professor, or devote myself to writing, speaking and consulting full time. It helps that I established myself
as a professional prior to becoming a mom. I doubt I would have the passion, vision or balance I’ve created for myself
if I’d not had a daughter of my own. I may never achieve the full earning potential displayed back when I was earning
a six-figure salary in the private practice of law, but I’ve enjoyed the same financial security through my marriage.
I know that my husband often measures his self-worth through dollars earned, but I can’t allow myself to be defined
by dollars. I think of Maslow’s hierarchy: all of my basic needs (food, shelter, clothing) are met and I have the luxury
of devoting my energies to self-actualization through creativity and service. I do plan to have it all, but even if I died
tomorrow or everything I currently have were lost, I would still feel as though I’ve had it all and I could have it
all again — just not all at once.














Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.