Morgan County sued over death of jail inmate

Dave Stafford
March 23, 2016
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The estate of a woman who was found dead in a Morgan County Jail cell after jail staff allegedly knew she required medical attention has filed a federal wrongful death suit against the sheriff, jail staff and contracted health care providers.

Tammy Perez, 34, was found dead in the jail in Martinsville on Oct. 1, 2015. She had been convicted of Level 6 felony possession of a narcotic and sentenced to spend 40 days in jail with an option for treatment if she could secure placement, according to the suit and trial court records. According to the suit filed Tuesday, authorities knew when she was booked into jail on Sept. 28, 2015, that she had heroin in her system and would go through withdrawal while behind bars.

But Perez also had a lifelong adrenal gland disorder that required daily medication that a relative had provided to jail staff with instructions. The complaint says Perez could not keep food or the medicine in her system, though. As she became sicker, her cellmates allegedly implored jail staff to take her to a hospital, which she had also pleaded for. A correctional officer at one point told Perez to “stop being a drama queen,” the complaint alleges.

As her condition worsened, the complaint says Perez was moved to an individual holding cell on Sept. 30. In the early morning hours of Oct. 1, a Martinsville police officer who knew Perez brought an arrestee to the jail, and when he saw her name on a whiteboard, he decided to check on her. He found her dead, the complaint says, noting that responding medical personnel found rigor mortis had set in, indicating Perez had been dead for an extended time.

A Morgan County jail commander contacted Wednesday said he had not seen the complaint and could not comment.

The complaint alleges deliberate indifference to Perez’s medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and negligence and wrongful death under state law.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have had an ongoing custody case for 6 yrs. I should have been the sole legal custodial parent but was a victim of a vindictive ex and the system biasedly supported him. He is an alcoholic and doesn't even have a license for two yrs now after his 2nd DUI. Fast frwd 6 yrs later my kids are suffering poor nutritional health, psychological issues, failing in school, have NO MD and the GAL could care less, DCS doesn't care. The child isn't getting his ADHD med he needs and will not succeed in life living this way. NO one will HELP our family.I tried for over 6 yrs. The judge called me an idiot for not knowing how to enter evidence and the last hearing was 8 mths ago. That in itself is unjust! The kids want to be with their Mother! They are being alienated from her and fed lies by their Father! I was hit in a car accident 3 yrs ago and am declared handicapped myself. Poor poor way to treat the indigent in Indiana!

  2. The Indiana DOE released the 2015-2016 school grades in Dec 2016 and my local elementary school is a "C" grade school. Look at the MCCSC boundary maps and how all of the most affluent neighborhoods have the best performance. It is no surprise that obtaining residency in the "A" school boundaries cost 1.5 to 3 times as much. As a parent I should have more options than my "C" school without needing to pay the premium to live in the affluent parts of town. If the charter were authorized by a non-religious school the plaintiffs would still be against it because it would still be taking per-pupil money from them. They are hiding behind the guise of religion as a basis for their argument when this is clearly all about money and nothing else.

  3. This is a horrible headline. The article is about challenging the ability of Grace College to serve as an authorizer. 7 Oaks is not a religiously affiliated school

  4. Congratulations to Judge Carmichael for making it to the final three! She is an outstanding Judge and the people of Indiana will benefit tremendously if/when she is chosen.

  5. The headline change to from "religious" to "religious-affiliated" is still inaccurate and terribly misleading.