ILNews

ND Law dedicates renovated hall

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Law School Briefs

Law School Briefs is Indiana Lawyer’s new section that will highlight news from law schools in Indiana. While we have always covered law school news and will continue to keep up with law school websites and press releases for updates, we’ll gladly accept submissions for this section from law students, professors, alums, and others who want to share law school-related news. If you’d like to submit news or a photo from an event, please send it to Rebecca Berfanger, rberfanger@ibj.com, along with contact information for any follow up questions at least two weeks in advance of the issue date.

Notre Dame Law School’s completely renovated Biolchini Hall of Law was dedicated earlier this month. After a mass of celebration in the Basilica at Notre Dame, Fr. John Jenkins blessed the building.

The hall was named following a $15 million gift from Robert Biolchini and his wife Fran in honor of the Biolchini family.

The Biolchinis dedicated The Biolchini Hall of Law “to their six children and to all those who study here, seeking God’s Justice through Faith and the Rule of Law.” Of the Biolchini’s six children, five are Notre Dame graduates.

A number of other benefactors also gave to support the renovation. Among the guests at the private dinner and reception was Supreme Court of the United States Justice Samuel Anthony Alito Jr.

The renovated Biolchini Hall of Law is connected by a covered archway and student commons to the Law School’s new Eck Hall of Law. Biolchini Hall houses Main Reading Room 250, an expanded Kresge Law Library, two new 50-seat classrooms, new space for Notre Dame Law Review, new offices and work space for admissions, career services, and library staff, a new seminar room, and 26 new study rooms for collaborative study.

According to a brochure for the dedication, the library now holds “300,000 book volumes and more than 300,000 volume-equivalents in microforms; currently using more than 12 miles of shelving, and enough additional space for nearly 20 years of growth.”

The total cost of the law school renovation project is “approximately $57,680,000, with approximately $24,091,000 dedicated to the renovation of Biolchini Hall,” according to the brochure.

“The comprehensive renovation has created a consistent and appropriate level of finish throughout a facility that was previously rather confusing and disjointed in its presentation,” according to the brochure. “It resolved 17 library entrances to a single entrance and reconfigured the building to four consistent and equally accessible floor levels, from a collection of seven floor levels connected through a series of ramps, elevators and internal stairs.”

The Biolchinis previously endowed The Biolchini Family Chair in Law, which is currently held by philosopher John Finnis, and the Erma V. Biolchini Endowed Scholarship Fund, honoring Robert’s mother.

Robert Biolchini graduated from Notre Dame in 1962 with a Bachelor of Arts degree. He received his LLB in 1965 from George Washington University and is a partner with the Tulsa, Okla., law firm of Stuart Biolchini & Turner.

Fran Biolchini, a graduate of Trinity College, is active in numerous Tulsa community organizations, including the Girl Scouts, the Gilcrease Museum, Catholic Charities, and other civic and charitable projects.

The Biolchinis’ gift is part of the $1.5 billion Spirit of Notre Dame capital campaign, which is the largest endeavor of its kind in the history of Catholic higher education.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  2. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  3. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  4. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  5. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

ADVERTISEMENT