ILNews

ND Law dedicates renovated hall

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Law School Briefs

Law School Briefs is Indiana Lawyer’s new section that will highlight news from law schools in Indiana. While we have always covered law school news and will continue to keep up with law school websites and press releases for updates, we’ll gladly accept submissions for this section from law students, professors, alums, and others who want to share law school-related news. If you’d like to submit news or a photo from an event, please send it to Rebecca Berfanger, rberfanger@ibj.com, along with contact information for any follow up questions at least two weeks in advance of the issue date.

Notre Dame Law School’s completely renovated Biolchini Hall of Law was dedicated earlier this month. After a mass of celebration in the Basilica at Notre Dame, Fr. John Jenkins blessed the building.

The hall was named following a $15 million gift from Robert Biolchini and his wife Fran in honor of the Biolchini family.

The Biolchinis dedicated The Biolchini Hall of Law “to their six children and to all those who study here, seeking God’s Justice through Faith and the Rule of Law.” Of the Biolchini’s six children, five are Notre Dame graduates.

A number of other benefactors also gave to support the renovation. Among the guests at the private dinner and reception was Supreme Court of the United States Justice Samuel Anthony Alito Jr.

The renovated Biolchini Hall of Law is connected by a covered archway and student commons to the Law School’s new Eck Hall of Law. Biolchini Hall houses Main Reading Room 250, an expanded Kresge Law Library, two new 50-seat classrooms, new space for Notre Dame Law Review, new offices and work space for admissions, career services, and library staff, a new seminar room, and 26 new study rooms for collaborative study.

According to a brochure for the dedication, the library now holds “300,000 book volumes and more than 300,000 volume-equivalents in microforms; currently using more than 12 miles of shelving, and enough additional space for nearly 20 years of growth.”

The total cost of the law school renovation project is “approximately $57,680,000, with approximately $24,091,000 dedicated to the renovation of Biolchini Hall,” according to the brochure.

“The comprehensive renovation has created a consistent and appropriate level of finish throughout a facility that was previously rather confusing and disjointed in its presentation,” according to the brochure. “It resolved 17 library entrances to a single entrance and reconfigured the building to four consistent and equally accessible floor levels, from a collection of seven floor levels connected through a series of ramps, elevators and internal stairs.”

The Biolchinis previously endowed The Biolchini Family Chair in Law, which is currently held by philosopher John Finnis, and the Erma V. Biolchini Endowed Scholarship Fund, honoring Robert’s mother.

Robert Biolchini graduated from Notre Dame in 1962 with a Bachelor of Arts degree. He received his LLB in 1965 from George Washington University and is a partner with the Tulsa, Okla., law firm of Stuart Biolchini & Turner.

Fran Biolchini, a graduate of Trinity College, is active in numerous Tulsa community organizations, including the Girl Scouts, the Gilcrease Museum, Catholic Charities, and other civic and charitable projects.

The Biolchinis’ gift is part of the $1.5 billion Spirit of Notre Dame capital campaign, which is the largest endeavor of its kind in the history of Catholic higher education.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT