ILNews

New FMLA rule expands provisions for military families

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

The U.S. Department of Labor marked the 20th anniversary of the Family and Medical Leave Act by doing something that rarely happens in Washington, D.C. – it issued a new rule before the deadline.

Clarifying the amendments to the FMLA made by the 2010 fiscal year National Defense Authorization Act, this final rule focuses on expanding the leave provisions for military families. The expansion, especially for the military spouses and children, is seen as a reaction to the country’s extended military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan.

taylor Taylor

The final rule also provides airline flight crews, who often work erratic schedules, greater access to FMLA benefits and clarifies changes for calculating intermittent FMLA leave.

Indiana companies will most likely be impacted by the military provisions since the state has a healthy number of National Guard and Reserve members. Still, the changes introduced by the final rule are not sending clients to the phones to call their attorneys. The provisions were expected, the language of the final rule is mostly clear and, to date, many attorneys say there are no gray areas.

However, questions may arise as the final rule gets implemented.

“I don’t think that any of this was a huge surprise,” said Patricia Ogden, partner at Barnes & Thornburg LLP. “I think expanding coverage to military members was kind of an evolving issue.”

The FMLA was originally enacted on Feb. 5, 1993. It was designed to allow workers to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave from their offices and factory floors without having to worry about losing their jobs. Initially the qualifying events for FMLA were limited to the employee needing time to attend to his or her own serious health condition; to care for a spouse, parent, son or daughter with a serious medical problem; or to provide care after the birth or adoption of a child.

The 2013 final rule is the latest expansion of the FMLA. Also, it is an example of the Act growing beyond its original intention.

Military leave

Under the final rule, families of military members will have more circumstances for which they can take time off work.

Key provisions include:

• Qualifying exigency leave – a situation requiring an urgent response – has been expanded to include eligible employees with family members serving in the regular Armed Forces and deploying to a foreign country. Previously, only employees with a relative in the National Guard or Reserves were entitled to take leave for a qualifying exigency. For qualifying exigency events, spouses, adult children and parents of military members will be able to take FMLA leave for such circumstances as to prepare for a quick deployment, to attend to military activities, to attend to childcare or school events, to make financial and legal arrangements, counseling, and to attend to post-deployment activities.

• Military family members can take FMLA to provide parental care. In the instance where a military member is taking care of his or her infirmed parent when called to duty, the spouse or adult children may take leave to arrange for the parent’s care.

• The final rule expands the “military caregiver leave” provision to allow family members time off to care for eligible veterans with a serious injury or illness who are receiving medical treatment, recuperating or receiving therapy.

cassman Cassman

• Another expansion of the “military caregiver leave” provision enables family to take leave to care for service member’s injuries or illnesses that were pre-existing to deployment and were aggravated in the line of duty.

The new provision covering pre-existing conditions is an area where Lewis Wagner LLP attorney Stephanie Cassman sees a gap in the final rule that may lead to some confusion. Disputes might arise over whether the injury or illness is related to active duty in the first place and if the deployment actually did aggravate the condition.

The language “aggravated” is unclear, she said.

The final rule became effective March 8. Although the changes to the FMLA were not unexpected, Ogden noted employers will have to update their forms and hang the new poster that informs employees of the alterations.

Act’s anniversary

In the 20 years since the FMLA was enacted, attorneys say it is one of the most significant employment laws ever created, comparable to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Also, it is a rule they frequently deal with because employers often have questions caused by the complexity of the rule and the array of issues they are required to navigate.

Violating the FMLA, whether retaliating against a worker who took FMLA leave or interfering with an employee’s ability to take leave, can result in litigation. Consequently, when employers have doubts about an employee’s eligibility or if the reason for the leave is covered by the Act, they usually grant the leave rather than face a possible lawsuit.

Christopher Taylor, of counsel at Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP, compared the reaction that employers had when the FMLA was first introduced as being similar to how they are receiving the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Initially, employers were resistant, confused and angry. However, Taylor said, FMLA is now part of the landscape and businesses accept it.

“I think it has certainly been the most significant employment law of the last 20 years,” he said.

As for the future of FMLA, Cassman predicted the Act will continue to expand beyond its original medical focus.

She pointed to the 2013 final rule which increases the number of days from five to 15 that a family member can take when the service member comes home for rest and recuperation. Truly, she said, this provision provides leave just to visit and has nothing to do with any health care concerns.

wilson Wilson

“In my opinion, it has expanded more than what was ever anticipated when the FMLA was enacted 20 years ago,” Cassman said.

She observed the reason for the growth of FMLA is probably because of changes in the expectations around work and family. No longer do employees keep their office life and home life completely separated. The two are merging and employers have to recognize the need for workers to address family issues.

Amy Wilson, attorney at the Indianapolis office of Frost Brown Todd LLC, echoed Cassman. She noted that the new provisions allowing military family members leave to take care of child care and financial obligations exceeds the medical intent of the original language.

Looking ahead, Wilson can foresee the Act being expanded to give protection for time off to attend activities of children and grandchildren, or maybe even routine medical appointments.

However, she believes a more likely expansion of FMLA would be to include smaller employers. Currently the Act covers employers with 50 workers or more.

Another possible future change is mandating that FMLA leave be paid. States and even some cities have enacted legislation requiring employers to pay for FMLA leave. Part of the reasoning, Wilson said, is that the employee will need to have the paycheck during the leave in order to take care of the medical need.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Call it unauthorized law if you must, a regulatory wrong, but it was fraud and theft well beyond that, a seeming crime! "In three specific cases, the hearing officer found that Westerfield did little to no work for her clients but only issued a partial refund or no refund at all." That is theft by deception, folks. "In its decision to suspend Westerfield, the Supreme Court noted that she already had a long disciplinary history dating back to 1996 and had previously been suspended in 2004 and indefinitely suspended in 2005. She was reinstated in 2009 after finally giving the commission a response to the grievance for which she was suspended in 2004." WOW -- was the Indiana Supreme Court complicit in her fraud? Talk about being on notice of a real bad actor .... "Further, the justices noted that during her testimony, Westerfield was “disingenuous and evasive” about her relationship with Tope and attempted to distance herself from him. They also wrote that other aggravating factors existed in Westerfield’s case, such as her lack of remorse." WOW, and yet she only got 18 months on the bench, and if she shows up and cries for them in a year and a half, and pays money to JLAP for group therapy ... back in to ride roughshod over hapless clients (or are they "marks") once again! Aint Hoosier lawyering a great money making adventure!!! Just live for the bucks, even if filthy lucre, and come out a-ok. ME on the other hand??? Lifetime banishment for blowing the whistle on unconstitutional governance. Yes, had I ripped off clients or had ANY disciplinary history for doing that I would have fared better, most likely, as that it would have revealed me motivated by Mammon and not Faith. Check it out if you doubt my reading of this, compare and contrast the above 18 months with my lifetime banishment from court, see appendix for Bar Examiners report which the ISC adopted without substantive review: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS

  2. Wow, over a quarter million dollars? That is a a lot of commissary money! Over what time frame? Years I would guess. Anyone ever try to blow the whistle? Probably not, since most Hoosiers who take notice of such things realize that Hoosier whistleblowers are almost always pilloried. If someone did blow the whistle, they were likely fired. The persecution of whistleblowers is a sure sign of far too much government corruption. Details of my own personal experience at the top of Hoosier governance available upon request ... maybe a "fake news" media outlet will have the courage to tell the stories of Hoosier whistleblowers that the "real" Hoosier media (cough) will not deign to touch. (They are part of the problem.)

  3. So if I am reading it right, only if and when African American college students agree to receive checks labeling them as "Negroes" do they receive aid from the UNCF or the Quaker's Educational Fund? In other words, to borrow from the Indiana Appellate Court, "the [nonprofit] supposed to be [their] advocate, refers to [students] in a racially offensive manner. While there is no evidence that [the nonprofits] intended harm to [African American students], the harm was nonetheless inflicted. [Black students are] presented to [academia and future employers] in a racially offensive manner. For these reasons, [such] performance [is] deficient and also prejudice[ial]." Maybe even DEPLORABLE???

  4. I'm the poor soul who spent over 10 years in prison with many many other prisoners trying to kill me for being charged with a sex offense THAT I DID NOT COMMIT i was in jail for a battery charge for helping a friend leave a boyfriend who beat her I've been saying for over 28 years that i did not and would never hurt a child like that mine or anybody's child but NOBODY wants to believe that i might not be guilty of this horrible crime or think that when i say that ALL the paperwork concerning my conviction has strangely DISAPPEARED or even when the long beach judge re-sentenced me over 14 months on a already filed plea bargain out of another districts court then had it filed under a fake name so i could not find while trying to fight my conviction on appeal in a nut shell people are ALWAYS quick to believe the worst about some one well I DID NOT HURT ANY CHILD EVER IN MY LIFE AND HAVE SAID THIS FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS please if anybody can me get some kind of justice it would be greatly appreciated respectfully written wrongly accused Brian Valenti

  5. A high ranking Indiana supreme Court operative caught red handed leading a group using the uber offensive N word! She must denounce or be denounced! (Or not since she is an insider ... rules do not apply to them). Evidence here: http://m.indianacompanies.us/friends-educational-fund-for-negroes.364110.company.v2#top_info

ADVERTISEMENT