ILNews

New project to emphasize dangers of texting while driving

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

The Indiana Trial Lawyers Association’s College of Fellows used to be a way to honor respected members of the profession. But in recent years, it has become much more.

Now beginning his second term as College of Fellows president, Steve Williams of Terre Haute’s Williams Law Firm explained the evolution of the College of Fellows.

williams-steve.jpg Williams

“It was initially just a form of recognition of outstanding trial lawyers association members, but over the last several years, we’ve chosen to make a major emphasis of the College of Fellows a yearly community service project,” he said.

The fellows previously raised $50,000 in order to create care packages for soldiers in Afghanistan. They also raised funds for a program that sent basic necessities and food home with students in need, in association with Gleaners Food Bank.

In the coming year, the fellows will take on a project that is especially important to one ITLA member.

“Last year, Neil Comer’s granddaughter was killed as a result of texting while driving, and as sometimes happens in a tragedy like this, Neil reached out to the ITLA asking that all of us use this as a learning experience with our own families and our own friends, try to use this as a teaching experience to educate families and friends, try to educate about the dangers of texting while driving,” Williams said.

Many members responded by advertising about the dangers of texting while driving. Williams said there was consensus that the issue was so important that it could be an excellent project for the College of Fellows.

The project is still in development, and several approaches have been discussed.

“We might produce an anti-texting video that could be used to reach high-school-age kids. As we’re getting into this, we’re finding that there are several videos out there – one produced by the American Association for Justice, which is a national organization of plaintiffs’ trial lawyers – so we don’t want to reinvent the wheel if there’s a good video out there. Our project may be to deliver that to high-school-age kids,” Williams said.

The fellows will work with the ITLA Young Lawyers section to implement a program by the end of 2012.

Outside the courtroom

Williams believes that many people may not realize the positive change that many ITLA members are making in their communities.

ITLA member Steven Langer, of Langer & Langer in Valparaiso, created the Porter County Reading Foundation which helps children learn to read. Indianapolis lawyer Tom Hastings of The Hastings Law Firm has offered free office space to the People’s Burn Foundation, and Bruce Kehoe of Wilson Kehoe & Winingham was one of 11 people who raised $5.5 million for a new burn center at Wishard Hospital in Indianapolis. These are just a few of the efforts initiated by ITLA members, Williams said.

One of the qualifications for inclusion in the College of Fellows is active participation in community service activities. And overall, fellows are the hardest working, most respected members of the ITLA, Williams said. Currently, only 73 attorneys are members of this prestigious group.

“I just think that the people that are in the college are very, very proud of the fact that the primary emphasis of the organization has become community service projects,” Williams said. “It’s nice to pat yourself on the back or be patted on the back about being an outstanding trial lawyer, but this really highlights what is not very well known about the Indiana Trial Lawyers Association, and that is so many of our members are so involved in their local communities or even on a statewide level with community service.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT