A nonprofit organization made up of agencies that provide services to abused and neglected kids is suing the Indiana Department
of Child Services for cutting rates paid to the agencies next year.
The Indiana Association of Residential Child Care Agencies Inc. filed suit Monday against DCS and director James W. Payne
in Marion Superior Court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.
DCS contracts with IARCCA's members to provide services to children as described in Title IV-E of the Federal Social
Security Act, which include foster care placements and residential placements. About 80 members provide services that include
a residential component.
According to the suit, No. 49D11-0912-PL-056480, the DCS informed residential members earlier this month that the rates for
2010 will be cut between 4 and 14 percent and no less than 20 percent for licensed child placing agencies. DCS allegedly told
the licensed child placing agencies that it would transfer the children to other locations if the providers didn't sign
the new contracts with the lower rates within five days of receipt.
The contracts provide for a per diem rate set by DCS, but there is no written explanation as to how these reimbursement rates
are calculated.
IARCCA accuses the DCS of failing to establish any rules or method by which it sets provider reimbursement rates and that
DCS arbitrarily is cutting rates paid to providers.
IARCCA says the cuts will affect the quality of the children's care, result in higher ratios of children to staff supervisors,
higher caseloads for therapists, and reductions of tutoring and mentoring programs.
IARCCA wants the court to declare that DCS' setting of per diem rate payments to providers other than pursuant to promulgated
rules violates Indiana Code Section 4-22 and Title IV-E. IARCCA also seeks a preliminary injunction preventing DCS from reducing
its rates until it has promulgated rules governing the establishment of per diem rates, and permanent injunctive relief requiring
the agency to set rates and to change rates in accordance with written standards in state and federal law. IARCCA also wants
relief to prevent DCS from taking any action concerning children in the care of providers based solely on decisions about
the rates to providers.














Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.