ILNews

Northern District seeks comment on local rules

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana is seeking public comment on several proposed local rules: LR 7.1, Motion Practice; Length and Form of Briefs; 56.1, Summary Judgment; 200.1, Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; and Appendix C – Notice to Pro Se Litigant. The proposed revision and commentary are available on the court’s website.

Comments must be submitted by Oct. 22 online or in writing to Local Rules Comments, Office of the Clerk, 204 S. Main St., Room 304, South Bend, IN 46601.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Indiana is also seeking comment on a proposed change to Rule B-9010-2, Appearance and Withdrawal, amending the rule to clarify when an appearance is required to be filed. The proposed change is on the court’s website.


Comments must be sent by Oct. 14 to Christopher M. DeToro, Clerk of the Court, United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Indiana, 401 S. Michigan St., South Bend, Ind. 46601-2365; or by e-mail to comments@innb.uscourts.gov.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Why in the world would someone need a person to correct a transcript when a realtime court reporter could provide them with a transcript (rough draft) immediately?

  2. If the end result is to simply record the spoke word, then perhaps some day digital recording may eventually be the status quo. However, it is a shallow view to believe the professional court reporter's function is to simply report the spoken word and nothing else. There are many aspects to being a professional court reporter, and many aspects involved in producing a professional and accurate transcript. A properly trained professional steno court reporter has achieved a skill set in a field where the average dropout rate in court reporting schools across the nation is 80% due to the difficulty of mastering the necessary skills. To name just a few "extras" that a court reporter with proper training brings into a courtroom or a deposition suite; an understanding of legal procedure, technology specific to the legal profession, and an understanding of what is being said by the attorneys and litigants (which makes a huge difference in the quality of the transcript). As to contracting, or anti-contracting the argument is simple. The court reporter as governed by our ethical standards is to be the independent, unbiased individual in a deposition or courtroom setting. When one has entered into a contract with any party, insurance carrier, etc., then that reporter is no longer unbiased. I have been a court reporter for over 30 years and I echo Mr. Richardson's remarks that I too am here to serve.

  3. A competitive bid process is ethical and appropriate especially when dealing with government agencies and large corporations, but an ethical line is crossed when court reporters in Pittsburgh start charging exorbitant fees on opposing counsel. This fee shifting isn't just financially biased, it undermines the entire justice system, giving advantages to those that can afford litigation the most. It makes no sense.

  4. "a ttention to detail is an asset for all lawyers." Well played, Indiana Lawyer. Well played.

  5. I have a appeals hearing for the renewal of my LPN licenses and I need an attorney, the ones I have spoke to so far want the money up front and I cant afford that. I was wondering if you could help me find one that takes payments or even a pro bono one. I live in Indiana just north of Indianapolis.

ADVERTISEMENT