ILNews

Northern District seeks comment on local rules

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana is seeking public comment on several proposed local rules: LR 7.1, Motion Practice; Length and Form of Briefs; 56.1, Summary Judgment; 200.1, Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; and Appendix C – Notice to Pro Se Litigant. The proposed revision and commentary are available on the court’s website.

Comments must be submitted by Oct. 22 online or in writing to Local Rules Comments, Office of the Clerk, 204 S. Main St., Room 304, South Bend, IN 46601.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Indiana is also seeking comment on a proposed change to Rule B-9010-2, Appearance and Withdrawal, amending the rule to clarify when an appearance is required to be filed. The proposed change is on the court’s website.


Comments must be sent by Oct. 14 to Christopher M. DeToro, Clerk of the Court, United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Indiana, 401 S. Michigan St., South Bend, Ind. 46601-2365; or by e-mail to comments@innb.uscourts.gov.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT