ILNews

Book targeting youth touches on deputy prosecutor's experiences

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share


An Allen County deputy prosecutor has published her first novel for young adults that, while entirely fiction, includes some references to issues she has dealt with in her work handling child abuse cases.

Laurie Gray said she has enjoyed writing since she was young. In fact, five of the poems she wrote in high school that were published in her high school literary magazine are included in the book as works written by her main female character.

But it was in recent years, since having her daughter who's now in second grade, that she has been reading and writing more. In that time, she's been spending more time at a public branch library near her house. While there, she said she would observe other people including children who were home schooled and people she recognized from her work as a guardian ad litem.

So it's no surprise when she started writing the book in 2005 she created characters for "Summer Sanctuary" who spend most of their time in a library: Matthew, a 12-year-old preacher's son who is home schooled; and Dinah, a young teenager who practically lives at the library and is hiding out from her mother's abusive boyfriend and the child welfare system until her mother is released from prison.

Throughout the story, Matthew explains to Dinah what his home life is like. He's has three younger brothers, Mark, Luke, and John, and his mother is pregnant with his fourth sibling Matthew's friend jokingly calls "Acts" because it's the next book of the Bible after John.

And because he's home schooled, he doesn't have a grade but works at different grade levels in different subjects and works on independent projects.

As a home-schooled kid, he's also very sheltered. On the other hand, the first time he sees Dinah, she is taking a sandwich out of the trash that he has just thrown away. He thinks she's a boy at first because of her baggy clothes and short hair, which she later explains was her defense mechanism from having older men stare at her.

Like Matthew, Gray said seeing other home-schooled kids at the library she would visit helped her realize that it is sometimes their only connection to the outside world.

And Dinah's experiences were also based in reality, including her mother's boyfriend who asks her to sleep in his bed, even though nothing happens and Dinah runs away as a result.

"I've watched the system long enough, including cases where parents' rights were terminated to know what that's really like," Gray said. "The system is there to help children like Dinah, but she doesn't want it. Her mom grew up in it and she saw it as a two-edged sword."

Because Matthew feels sorry for Dinah, he uses his resources to help her. He has access to a church within walking distance because his father is a preacher there. Because Matthew also knows the schedule of when people are or are not in the church, he knows how to sneak Dinah in and out.

He also uses resources in other ways.

He gets a library card in his name and checks out a book for her. He packs bigger lunches for himself so he has more to share with her. And she helps him in other ways, such as helping him set up an e-mail address so they can stay in touch, and sharing her poetry with him.

Gray said one of the things she wanted to have for the characters, other than their differences, was a common bond of music. Matthew plays piano, mostly hymns at the church, and Dinah plays a harmonica she carries around with her at all times. If Matthew plays songs in the same key as the harmonica, she can play along with him. Matthew also checks out a library book on his card about harmonicas for her to study.

As research for the book, Gray said she bought a harmonica and planned to play it for book readings with children.

While it is never openly revealed that Matthew's parents knew he was helping Dinah live in the church - they never even officially meet her even though she meets his younger brothers - Gray said she wanted to imply that they knew through various conversations they have with him about the idea of sanctuary and how important it is to help people who are less fortunate.

"The book is about how he is used to having the security of his parents, but he's also figuring out on his own what he needs to do," she said.

Because the book is for kids, she said, she wanted readers to think about whether or not he got away with it. And if he did, would he ever tell his parents, considering Dinah told him not to tell anyone, no matter what.

She said that she has shared the book with other authors, as well as home-schooled children. She said their biggest complaint was that Matthew did things his parents told him not to - including signing up for an e-mail address and lying about his age to do so, and getting a library card behind his parents back.

A few parents who read the book also didn't like that even in the beginning Matthew thinks to himself,  "At that moment I was convinced the summer was going to suck. Only I'm not allowed to say 'suck.'"

Gray said finding a publisher wasn't easy. Like most authors she received many rejection letters before Carmel-based Luminis Publishing decided to publish and promote her book, now available on major online book retailers.

"We chose to publish Laurie's book because it has 'depth' to it," wrote her publisher Chris Katsaropoulos via e-mail. "That is, it goes beyond what most normal young adult fiction covers, touching on issues of spirituality, teen identity, and acceptance of others who are different than oneself."

He also described her work as quirky, funny, and interesting.

"We did not consider Laurie's background as a lawyer when deciding to publish this book," he added, "though her experience prosecuting child sexual abuse cases lends authority to her handling of the situation of the homeless girl in the book."

Gray said she plans to promote the book through church, school, and educator events. She recently participated at a book fair and has other events scheduled in coming months. She also is leaving the prosecutors office April 30, but said she was unsure what she would do next beyond promoting her book and speaking for conferences.

More information about Gray and her new book are available on her website, http://www.socraticparenting.com/. Excerpts are available on her publisher's website, http://www.luminisbooks.com.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Applause, applause, applause ..... but, is this duty to serve the constitutional order not much more incumbent upon the State, whose only aim is to be pure and unadulterated justice, than defense counsel, who is also charged with gaining a result for a client? I agree both are responsible, but it seems to me that the government attorneys bear a burden much heavier than defense counsel .... "“I note, much as we did in Mechling v. State, 16 N.E.3d 1015 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014), trans. denied, that the attorneys representing the State and the defendant are both officers of the court and have a responsibility to correct any obvious errors at the time they are committed."

  2. Do I have to hire an attorney to get co-guardianship of my brother? My father has guardianship and my older sister was his co-guardian until this Dec 2014 when she passed and my father was me to go on as the co-guardian, but funds are limit and we need to get this process taken care of quickly as our fathers health isn't the greatest. So please advise me if there is anyway to do this our self or if it requires a lawyer? Thank you

  3. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  4. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  5. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

ADVERTISEMENT