Nurse-attorney Barbra Bachmeier removes obstacles to helping victims

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
bachmeier-6-15col.jpg Nurse-attorney Barbra Bachmeier (top left) counsels a patient. (IL Photo/Eric Learned)

As a family nurse practitioner/forensic nurse examiner, Barbra Bachmeier lets her patients decide what she can and cannot do.

The 54-year-old pulls shifts in the emergency room of Indiana University Methodist Hospital, often treating individuals who are victims of interpersonal violence such as sexual assault and domestic abuse. Severely traumatized, these patients are given the ability to choose what part of their bodies they will allow to be examined and what part they will not. They can stop the exam at any time, and they can walk away without reporting the incident to the police.

The philosophy of empowering her patients transfers into Bachmeier’s practice as an attorney. Working solely in the area of adult guardianships, she gives her clients the freedom to make their own choices.

“I like taking care of people,” she said.

Bachmeier’s decision to go to law school came about because of her work as a nurse. More and more in the emergency room, she encountered children who were abused and adults who had been battered or sexually assaulted. The difficult work initially made her want to understand the victims more and eventually led her to volunteer as a guardian ad litem.

In the fall of 2001, she moved to the Wolverine State and enrolled in the Western Michigan University Cooley Law School. She has since established a solo practice but she continues to work in the emergency room to help pay the bills.

Bachmeier also continues to volunteer as a guardian ad litem for the Hamilton County GAL/CASA Program.

Shelley Haymaker, director of the program, noted many people want to help these children but often they find the heartbreak too much and leave the program. Bachmeier has stayed, handling one case at a time and following it through until it is closed.

Describing Bachmeier as a strong advocate for children, Haymaker said she will bring everyone together to formulate a plan as to what can be done to get the youngster out of limbo.

“Barb has a very good mix about her,” Haymaker said. “She’s not overbearing but she does make sure people are doing what they’re supposed to do.”

When she is talking about the obstacles that crop up in her legal work helping incapacitated adults or during the treatment of her patients in the hospital, exasperation can creep into her voice at times. In navigating those hurdles, she outlined a straightforward approach of “you’re either part of the problem or you’re part of the solution.”

bachmeier-2-15col.jpg Bachmeier aims to empower her medical patients and legal clients and give them freedom in making decisions. (IL Photo/Eric Learned)

That disposition may come from her 29-year service in the U.S. Army National Guard. She joined fresh from high school, following a friend into the military because she had no other plans. “Best decision of my life,” Bachmeier said.

Her later deployment to the Balkans interrupted her law school studies and pushed back her graduation to January 2007. Then as she was establishing her practice, she was called to active duty again, this time going to Iraq. She returned home in 2009.

Settled back in Indiana a year later, Bachmeier joined Holly Renz of the Madison County Sexual Assault Treatment Center to remove an obstacle for rape victims. The state had stopped covering the cost of the anti-viral medication that can help prevent HIV, leaving assault patients having to pay $4,000 or more themselves for the month’s dose.

The pair began prodding the Indiana General Assembly in 2010 to restore state funding. This session, they were finally successful with Senate Bill 279, which provides reimbursement for HIV prophylactic medication. The bill is now sitting on the governor’s desk.

Seeing rape victims having to travel to Indianapolis from rural parts of the state, Bachmeier realized another obstacle: nurses at some of the smaller hospitals did not have the training to do physical exams. Medical professionals had to travel to either Indianapolis or Rensselaer to receive the training. Getting the time off work, in addition to paying the cost to take the course and covering the gas and hotel expenses, created a barrier.

So she secured funding through Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing and helped developed an online version of the Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner certification course. The curriculum includes medical and legal material that will teach nurses how meet the needs of these victims. Topics range from specimen collection and sexual disease testing to legal considerations and judicial proceedings.

Reflecting her own background, Bachmeier sees the course as also potentially benefitting defense attorneys, prosecutors and social workers. She maintains it can help lawyers who handle these cases better understand the medical and health care aspects of treatment and care.

The online course seems to highlight Bachmeier’s approach of letting her patients and law clients make the decisions. She will ask questions, probe into social concerns, offer information and comfort while letting the victim have control.

“It’s all about the patient,” she said.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The voices of the prophets are more on blogs than subway walls these days, Dawn. Here is the voice of one calling out in the wilderness ... against a corrupted judiciary ... that remains corrupt a decade and a half later ... due to, so sadly, the acquiescence of good judges unwilling to shake the forest ... for fear that is not faith ..

  2. So I purchased a vehicle cash from the lot on West Washington in Feb 2017. Since then I found it the vehicle had been declared a total loss and had sat in a salvage yard due to fire. My title does not show any of that. I also have had to put thousands of dollars into repairs because it was not a solid vehicle like they stated. I need to find out how to contact the lawyers on this lawsuit.

  3. It really doesn't matter what the law IS, if law enforcement refuses to take reports (or take them seriously), if courts refuse to allow unrepresented parties to speak (especially in Small Claims, which is supposedly "informal"). It doesn't matter what the law IS, if constituents are unable to make effective contact or receive any meaningful response from their representatives. Two of our pets were unnecessarily killed; court records reflect that I "abandoned" them. Not so; when I was denied one of them (and my possessions, which by court order I was supposed to be able to remove), I went directly to the court. And earlier, when I tried to have the DV PO extended (it expired while the subject was on probation for violating it), the court denied any extension. The result? Same problems, less than eight hours after expiration. Ironic that the county sheriff was charged (and later pleaded to) with intimidation, but none of his officers seemed interested or capable of taking such a report from a private citizen. When I learned from one officer what I needed to do, I forwarded audio and transcript of one occurrence and my call to law enforcement (before the statute of limitations expired) to the prosecutor's office. I didn't even receive an acknowledgement. Earlier, I'd gone in to the prosecutor's office and been told that the officer's (written) report didn't match what I said occurred. Since I had the audio, I can only say that I have very little faith in Indiana government or law enforcement.

  4. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  5. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.