ILNews

On the Move - 4/9/14

IL Staff
April 9, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Move

On The Move highlights employment news, awards and honors attorneys receive, and board appointments or elected positions. Digital images should be 200 dpi and saved as eps, tiff or jpg. Color images are preferred. Information must be submitted at least 10 days before the Wednesday issue in which it is to appear. Submit your announcement at http://www.theindianalawyer.com/submit-on-the-move or email to managing editor Jennifer Nelson at jnelson@ibj.com. New Associations

slabaugh-jon-otm Young

*Ahmed Young has joined Bose McKinney & Evans LLP as an associate in the litigation group and Bose Public Affairs Group LLC as second vice president.
slabaugh-jon-otm Slabaugh
bantz-erin-otm.jpg Bantz
*Erin E. Bantz and *Jonathan R. Slabaugh have joined the law firm Sanders Pianowski LLP in Elkhart. Bantz practices in the areas of business planning, estate administration and estate planning. Slabaugh’s practice areas include civil litigation, business planning and employment law.

Appointments & Elections

moore-james-otm.jpg Moore
Ryan Moore & Cook partner *James (Jay) D. Moore has been elected to the board of directors of The Farmers Bank.
perry-sandra-otm.jpg Perry
janak-christopher-otm Janak
Bose McKinney & Evans LLP partners *Christopher Janak and *Sandra Perry have been elected to the firm’s executive committee for three-year terms.

Awards & Honors Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP senior partner Roderick Morgan and attorney Tamara McMillian were named as honorees in the 9th Edition of “Who’s Who in Black Indianapolis.”

herzog-david-otm.jpg Herzog
*David K. Herzog, a partner and leader of Faegre Baker Daniels LLP’s business litigation practice group, was named Indiana’s Business Litigation Attorney of the Year by Corporate INTL’s 2014 Global Awards. INTL recognized Faegre Baker Daniels as 2014 Employee Benefits Law Firm of the Year.
scheiderer-patrick-otm.jpg Scheiderer
Faegre Baker Daniels attorney *Patrick A. Scheiderer received a 2014 Client Choice Award in recognition of outstanding service to clients.

The American Board of Certification announced that Frederick L. Carpenter II, an attorney with Daniel L. Freeland & Associates P.C. in Highland, has completed requirements for national certification in consumer bankruptcy law.

New Location SmithAmundsen has moved its Indianapolis office to 201 N. Illinois St., Suite 1400, Capital Center, South Tower, Indianapolis IN 46204.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The $320,000 is the amount the school spent in litigating two lawsuits: One to release the report involving John Trimble (as noted in the story above) and one defending the discrimination lawsuit. The story above does not mention the amount spent to defend the discrimination suit, that's why the numbers don't match. Thanks for reading.

  2. $160k? Yesterday the figure was $320k. Which is it Indiana Lawyer. And even more interesting, which well connected law firm got the (I am guessing) $320k, six time was the fired chancellor received. LOL. (From yesterday's story, which I guess we were expected to forget overnight ... "According to records obtained by the Journal & Courier, Purdue spent $161,812, beginning in July 2012, in a state open records lawsuit and $168,312, beginning in April 2013, for defense in a federal lawsuit. Much of those fees were spent battling court orders to release an independent investigation by attorney John Trimble that found Purdue could have handled the forced retirement better")

  3. The numbers are harsh; 66 - 24 in the House, 40 - 10 in the Senate. And it is an idea pushed by the Democrats. Dead end? Ummm not necessarily. Just need to go big rather than go home. Nuclear option. Give it to the federal courts, the federal courts will ram this down our throats. Like that other invented right of the modern age, feticide. Rights too precious to be held up by 2000 years of civilization hang in the balance. Onward!

  4. I'm currently seeing someone who has a charge of child pornography possession, he didn't know he had it because it was attached to a music video file he downloaded when he was 19/20 yrs old and fought it for years until he couldn't handle it and plead guilty of possession. He's been convicted in Illinois and now lives in Indiana. Wouldn't it be better to give them a chance to prove to the community and their families that they pose no threat? He's so young and now because he was being a kid and downloaded music at a younger age, he has to pay for it the rest of his life? It's unfair, he can't live a normal life, and has to live in fear of what people can say and do to him because of something that happened 10 years ago? No one deserves that, and no one deserves to be labeled for one mistake, he got labeled even though there was no intent to obtain and use the said content. It makes me so sad to see someone I love go through this and it makes me holds me back a lot because I don't know how people around me will accept him...second chances should be given to those under the age of 21 at least so they can be given a chance to live a normal life as a productive member of society.

  5. It's just an ill considered remark. The Sup Ct is inherently political, as it is a core part of government, and Marbury V Madison guaranteed that it would become ever more so Supremely thus. So her remark is meaningless and she just should have not made it.... what she could have said is that Congress is a bunch of lazys and cowards who wont do their jobs so the hard work of making laws clear, oftentimes stops with the Sups sorting things out that could have been resolved by more competent legislation. That would have been a more worthwhile remark and maybe would have had some relevance to what voters do, since voters cant affect who gets appointed to the supremely un-democratic art III courts.

ADVERTISEMENT