ILNews

On The Move - 5/8/13

IL Staff
May 8, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Move
On The Move highlights employment news, awards and honors attorneys receive, and board appointments or elected positions. Digital images should be 200 dpi and saved as eps, tiff or jpg. Color images are preferred. Information must be submitted at least 10 days before the Wednesday issue in which it is to appear. Submit your announcement at http://www.theindianalawyer.com/submit-on-the-move or email to managing editor Jennifer Nelson at jnelson@ibj.com.
 
New Associations
quick-amanda-otm.jpg Quick
*Amanda Koziura Quick has joined SK Dick & Associates LLC where she will focus her practice on individual and small business bankruptcies, debt settlements and tax matters.
Robert W. Markette Jr. has joined the Indianapolis office of Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman P.C. as of counsel in the firm’s health practice group.
 
Dana L. Luetzelschwab has been hired as the plan administrator for Heartland Pro Bono Council, which provides pro bono legal services to Marion County residents.
 
wyatt-carol-otm Wyatt
lange-david-otm.jpg Lange
*David J. Lange has joined Dugan & Voland as an associate with experience in medical malpractice and general litigation defense. *Carol M. Wyatt has joined the firm as partner and focuses her practice on workers’ compensation and employment law defense.
cotterill-sarah-otm.jpg Cotterill
*Sarah Dansker Cotterill has joined American Health Network as vice president and general counsel.
Appointments and Elections
Stephen L. Ferguson, an attorney and executive with Cook Group Inc. and partner at Ferguson Ferguson & Lloyd, has joined the Indiana Continuing Legal Education Forum’s board of directors.
 
Donald E. Knebel, partner at Barnes & Thornburg LLP, has been elected to the board of directors for Christel House International.
 
Attorney and Valparaiso Mayor Jon Costas has been appointed by Gov. Mike Pence to the Indiana Commission for Higher Education.
 
felts-christopher-otm.jpg Felts
Barnes & Thornburg LLP partner *Christopher Felts has been named board vice president for The Immigrant Welcome Center in Indianapolis.
czernik-molly-otm.jpg Czernik
Dugan & Voland associate *Molly E. Czernik has been elected vice chair of the Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana.
brown-christopher-otm.jpg Brown
*Christopher Brown has been elected to the management committee of Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry LLP.
Teri Flory of Flory & Smith, Attorneys at Law; Shawn R. Little of Fehrenbach Taylor Law Office; David Mattingly of Mattingly Legal LLC; Lori Stein Sabol of Sabol Law Office; and Norris Wang were recently re-elected to three-year terms to the Legal Aid Corporation of Tippecanoe County board of directors. Sabol was elected as president; Little as vice-president; and Flory has agreed to be fundraising chair.
 
schuckit-robert-otm.jpg Schuckit
*Robert Schuckit of Schuckit & Associates P.C. has been named Indiana council chair and national council member of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
Awards and Honors
mattingly-david-otm.jpg Mattingly
Ice Miller LLP partner *David Mattingly has received the TRAC Star Award for his lifetime achievement in the racing industry.
cosaro-paul-otm.jpg Corsaro
Ice Miller LLP partner *Paul Corsaro received Catholic Charities Indianapolis’ 2013 Spirit of Service Award for Community Service.
garcia-angela-otm.jpg Garcia
Carson Boxberger attorney *Angela Garcia has received the ATHENA Young Professional Leadership Award for her work in the legal community and serving as a role model for young women professionally and personally.
ferber-judy-otm.jpg Ferber
jenkins-sarah-otm.jpg Jenkins
pebworth-carl-otm.jpg Pebworth
Faegre Baker Daniels LLP presented its inaugural Baker Benson Pro Bono Award to *Carl R. Pebworth and *Sarah Jenkins. *Judy L. Ferber received the firm’s inaugural Outstanding Pro Bono Service Award.
Tricia Milanese received the 2013 Heartland Pro Bono Award for her many hours of pro bono work for Indianapolis Legal Aid, the Heartland Pro Bono Council and Kids’ Voice of Indiana.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  2. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  3. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  4. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

  5. Seventh Circuit Court Judge Diane Wood has stated in “The Rule of Law in Times of Stress” (2003), “that neither laws nor the procedures used to create or implement them should be secret; and . . . the laws must not be arbitrary.” According to the American Bar Association, Wood’s quote drives home this point: The rule of law also requires that people can expect predictable results from the legal system; this is what Judge Wood implies when she says that “the laws must not be arbitrary.” Predictable results mean that people who act in the same way can expect the law to treat them in the same way. If similar actions do not produce similar legal outcomes, people cannot use the law to guide their actions, and a “rule of law” does not exist.

ADVERTISEMENT