ILNews

On The Move - 6/5/13

IL Staff
June 5, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Move
On The Move highlights employment news, awards and honors attorneys receive, and board appointments or elected positions. Digital images should be 200 dpi and saved as eps, tiff or jpg. Color images are preferred. Information must be submitted at least 10 days before the Wednesday issue in which it is to appear. Submit your announcement at http://www.theindianalawyer.com/submit-on-the-move or email to managing editor Jennifer Nelson at jnelson@ibj.com.
 
New Associations
keen-robert-otm.jpg Keen
*Robert T. Keen Jr. has joined Barrett & McNagny LLP, where he will practice in the area of litigation, including insurance defense.
sutherlin-steve-otm-otm.jpg Sutherlin
smith-ron-otm.jpg Smith
halbert-jeff-otm.jpg Halbert
*Jeffrey Halbert, *Ron Smith and *Steve Sutherlin have joined Bose McKinney & Evans LLP as partners. Halbert is a partner in the labor and employment law and business groups. Sutherlin is a partner in the business law group; Smith is chair of the automotive law group and a member of the labor and employment law and business law groups. The three previously practiced at Stewart & Irwin P.C. in Indianapolis.
gaerte-michael-otm.jpg Gaerte
*K. Michael Gaerte has joined the Indianapolis office of Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP where he will practice in criminal defense at the trial and appellate levels.
saddiqui-shariq-otm.jpg Saddiqui
*Shariq Saddiqui will serve as executive director of the Association for Research of Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, effective June 10.
Awards and Honors
kenyon-sean-otm.jpg Kenyon
Hoeppner Wagner & Evans LLP partner *Sean Kenyon was awarded the honor of Influential Woman in the Law at the Influential Women of Northwest Indiana Awards banquet May 23.
New Firm
lamb-eric-otm.jpg Lamb
schell-dennis-otm.jpg Schell
lindman-constance-otm.jpg Lindman
SmithAmundsen LLC, headquartered in Chicago, has opened an Indianapolis office. Five former members of Stewart & Irwin P.C. in Indianapolis have joined the firm: intellectual property attorneys *Constance Lindman, *Dennis Schell and *Eric Lamb; corporate law attorney Alyssa Rogers; and labor and employment attorney Suzanne Newcomb.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  2. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  3. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

  4. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

  5. I totally agree with John Smith.

ADVERTISEMENT