ILNews

On the Move - 7/17/13

IL Staff
July 17, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Move

On The Move highlights employment news, awards and honors attorneys receive, and board appointments or elected positions. Digital images should be 200 dpi and saved as eps, tiff or jpg. Color images are preferred. Information must be submitted at least 10 days before the Wednesday issue in which it is to appear. Submit your announcement at http://www.theindianalawyer.com/submit-on-the-move or email to managing editor Jennifer Nelson at jnelson@ibj.com. New Associations

allen-noell-otm.jpg Allen

*Noell F. Allen has joined the Indiana Civil Rights Commission as an administrative law judge.

Camille Wiggins has joined Ice Miller LLP as the director of legal personnel and diversity. Brion G. St. Amour has joined Indiana University Research & Technology Corp. as head of intellectual property.

nagy-jonathan-otm.jpg Nagy
*Jonathan P. Nagy has joined Beasley & Gilkison LLP in Muncie where he will concentrate his practice on personal injury and business litigation. He previously worked as staff counsel with American Family Mutual Insurance Co. in Wisconsin.
hou-yonghao-otm.jpg Hou
*Yonghao Hou has joined the intellectual property practice of Faegre Baker Daniels LLP in Indianapolis as an associate. She will focus on preparing and prosecuting patents and providing litigation and licensing counsel.
bell-tina-otm.jpg Bell
*Tina M. Bell has joined Cline Farrell Christie & Lee P.C. in Indianapolis, where she concentrates her practice in plaintiff’s medical malpractice matters.

Jenai S. Mehra has joined Frost Brown Todd LLC’s Indianapolis office where she will focus her practice in the areas of business and commercial litigation. Jeffery Mallamad has joined the labor and employment law department at Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Indianapolis office. He previously practiced at Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP. Promotions

cassman-stephanie-otm.jpg Cassman
*Stephanie Cassman has been elected equity partner at Lewis Wagner LLP effective July 1.

Awards and Honors

moshe-sarah-otm.jpg Moshe
Lewis & Kappes P.C. director *Sarah Moshe has received the Joseph Minsky Young Lawyer Award for outstanding contributions made in the fields of immigration and nationality law. The award is from the American Immigration Lawyers Association, an American Bar Association affiliate.
ebbinghouse-tom.jpg Ebbinghouse
*Tom S. Ebbinghouse has received the American Society of Tax Problem Solver’s Top Practitioner Award. ASTPS is a national, nonprofit organization of professionals who specialize in representing taxpayers before the IRS.

Appointments and Elections

moreau-bill-otm.jpg Moreau
Barnes & Thornburg LLP partner *Bill Moreau has been appointed to the board of directors of HVAF of Indiana, a United Way nonprofit that provides transitional housing and basic needs to homeless veterans.
green-melanie-otm.jpg Green
*Melanie Green, chief client development officer at Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, has been elected chair of Lex Mundi’s marketing and business development committee. Lex Mundi is the world’s leading association of independent law firms.
bishop-maryellen-otm.jpg Bishop
*MaryEllen Kiley Bishop, partner at Cohen Garelick & Glazier, has been re-elected by Indiana University alumni to a second term on the IU board of trustees.

New Firms

Means_Bill-otm.jpg Means
roberts-jeffrey-otm.jpg Roberts
*Jeffrey Roberts and *William Means have formed Roberts Means LLC, which will focus on business litigation and family law matters.
rabiola-tara-otm.jpg Rabiola
cairns-jaimie-otm.jpg Carins
*Jaimie Cairns and *Tara Rabiola have opened Cairns & Rabiola LLP in Indianapolis, which will focus on family law matters.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The $320,000 is the amount the school spent in litigating two lawsuits: One to release the report involving John Trimble (as noted in the story above) and one defending the discrimination lawsuit. The story above does not mention the amount spent to defend the discrimination suit, that's why the numbers don't match. Thanks for reading.

  2. $160k? Yesterday the figure was $320k. Which is it Indiana Lawyer. And even more interesting, which well connected law firm got the (I am guessing) $320k, six time was the fired chancellor received. LOL. (From yesterday's story, which I guess we were expected to forget overnight ... "According to records obtained by the Journal & Courier, Purdue spent $161,812, beginning in July 2012, in a state open records lawsuit and $168,312, beginning in April 2013, for defense in a federal lawsuit. Much of those fees were spent battling court orders to release an independent investigation by attorney John Trimble that found Purdue could have handled the forced retirement better")

  3. The numbers are harsh; 66 - 24 in the House, 40 - 10 in the Senate. And it is an idea pushed by the Democrats. Dead end? Ummm not necessarily. Just need to go big rather than go home. Nuclear option. Give it to the federal courts, the federal courts will ram this down our throats. Like that other invented right of the modern age, feticide. Rights too precious to be held up by 2000 years of civilization hang in the balance. Onward!

  4. I'm currently seeing someone who has a charge of child pornography possession, he didn't know he had it because it was attached to a music video file he downloaded when he was 19/20 yrs old and fought it for years until he couldn't handle it and plead guilty of possession. He's been convicted in Illinois and now lives in Indiana. Wouldn't it be better to give them a chance to prove to the community and their families that they pose no threat? He's so young and now because he was being a kid and downloaded music at a younger age, he has to pay for it the rest of his life? It's unfair, he can't live a normal life, and has to live in fear of what people can say and do to him because of something that happened 10 years ago? No one deserves that, and no one deserves to be labeled for one mistake, he got labeled even though there was no intent to obtain and use the said content. It makes me so sad to see someone I love go through this and it makes me holds me back a lot because I don't know how people around me will accept him...second chances should be given to those under the age of 21 at least so they can be given a chance to live a normal life as a productive member of society.

  5. It's just an ill considered remark. The Sup Ct is inherently political, as it is a core part of government, and Marbury V Madison guaranteed that it would become ever more so Supremely thus. So her remark is meaningless and she just should have not made it.... what she could have said is that Congress is a bunch of lazys and cowards who wont do their jobs so the hard work of making laws clear, oftentimes stops with the Sups sorting things out that could have been resolved by more competent legislation. That would have been a more worthwhile remark and maybe would have had some relevance to what voters do, since voters cant affect who gets appointed to the supremely un-democratic art III courts.

ADVERTISEMENT