ILNews

On the Move - 8/3/12 - 8/16/12

IL Staff
August 1, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Move

On The Move runs in the first issue of the month. Information must be submitted two weeks prior to the issue date. Digital images should be 200 dpi and saved as eps, tiff or jpeg. Color images are preferred. Submissions may be made at http://www.theindianalawyer.com submit-on-the-move or emailed to managing editor Jennifer Nelson at jnelson@ibj.com.

New Associations
C. Stuart Carter has joined White & White LLC in Indianapolis. His practice focuses on defense work.

Sophia B. Tippmann has joined Tourkow Crell Rosenblatt & Johnston in Fort Wayne as an associate.

Monica Foster has been selected as the executive director of the Indiana Federal Community Defenders Inc. in the Southern District of Indiana.

Amy E. Simcox has joined Wooden & McLaughlin LLP as an associate. She focuses her practice in real estate finance and development.

Matthew R. Schantz has joined Frost Brown Todd LLC in Indianapolis. He focuses his practice on intellectual property.

Promotions
Joseph H. Langerak IV has become partner at Rudolph Fine Porter & Johnson LLP in Evansville. His practice focuses on civil litigation.

Awards and Honors
David Carr, partner at Ice Miller LLP, and Danuta Panich, a shareholder in the Indianapolis office of Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart P.C., have been elected as a Fellows into the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers.

U.S. Judge Sarah Evans Barker in the Southern District of Indiana is the recipient of the 2012 Advancing American Democracy Award from the Benjamin Harrison Presidential Site. It will be presented to her Sept. 13 in Indianapolis.

Appointment and Elections
Deborah J. Daniels, partner at Krieg DeVault LLP, and John M. Mead, attorney at Leeuw Oberlies & Campbell P.C., have been elected to the Economic Club of Indiana board of directors. Daniels is vice president and Mead is secretary/COO for the 2012-2013 season.

New Offices
Detra Lynn Mills has opened Mills Law LLC, which focuses primarily on issues impacting Indiana families.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT