ILNews

On the Move - 10/12/11

IL Staff
October 12, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Move

On The Move: Information must be submitted at least 11 days prior to the Wednesday issue in which the announcement will appear. Digital images should be 200 dpi and saved as eps, tiff or jpeg. Color images are preferred. For more information or to submit an announcement, contact editor Kelly Lucas at klucas@ibj.com

New Associations
Amy Huffman Oliver has joined Stafford Law Offices in Bloomington. Her practice focuses on family law and domestic violence issues.

Douglas S. Byrum has joined Lewis & Kappes in the firm’s Zionsville office as of counsel. Byrum focuses in the areas of business, real estate, employment and contract law.

Benjamin A. Blair has been promoted to associate at Baker & Daniels. He will practice in the firm’s downtown Indianapolis office in the area of state and local tax law. Blair served as a law clerk with the firm prior to the promotion.

Laura Yockey has rejoined Baker & Daniels as an associate in the firm’s business and corporate finance group. She will practice in the firm’s north side Indianapolis office.

Sarah Rees Hamilton has joined Taft Stettinius & Hollister as an associate in the firm’s Indianapolis office. She will practice in the firm’s business and finance practice group.

Daniel J. Greenhalgh has joined Maginot Moore & Beck as an associate in the firm’s Indianapolis office.

New Firms
The law firm of Dilley & Oakley has opened at 933 Keystone Way in Carmel. Name partners are Daniel K. Dilley and Robert M. Oakley.

The law firm of Wanzer Edwards has opened in Indianapolis. Name partners are Holly J. Wanzer and Elisabeth M. Edwards. The firm is temporarily located at 101 W. Ohio St., Suite 200.

Zionsville law firm Burrus & Burrus has changed its name to Burrus & Sease. Name partners are Roger L. Burrus and Beth A. Sease. The firm is located at 410 W. Oak St.

Awards & Honors
Baker & Daniels attorney Charles Schalliol is being awarded the Burton D. Morgan Center for Entrepreneurship Award for 2011 from Purdue University’s Krannert School of Management. The award, which recognizes achievement and creativity in entrepreneurship, will be presented Oct. 20.

Cohen Garelick & Glazier attorney MaryEllen Kiley Bishop will receive a 2011 Indiana Woman of Achievement Award from Ball State University’s College of Sciences and Humanities. The recognition, given to Bishop for distinction in the legal profession, will be presented Oct. 19.

Elections & Appointments
Wagner Reese & Crossen attorney Jason R. Reese has been elected president to the board of directors of CenterPoint Counseling, a nonprofit organization affiliated with Second Presbyterian Church in Indianapolis.

The Indiana Creditors Bar Association has elected the following attorneys as its officers for 2011-2012: Julia Andrews, Bleecker Brodey & Andrews, president; Daniel Sandlin, Suess & Sandlin, vice president; Joe Guy, Guy Law Offices, treasurer; Valerie Matheis, Bowman Heintz Boscia & Vician, secretary.

Taft Stettinius & Hollister attorney John D. Papageorge has been appointed to the Zoobilation Committee for the Indianapolis Zoo.

Certifications
Cohen Garelick & Glazier attorney Steven M. Crell has added the designation Registered Civil Mediator to his scope of practice.

Baden Gage & Schroeder senior manager Mike Smith received the Accredited Senior Appraiser designation from the American Society of Appraisers.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT