ILNews

On the move - 5/11/11

IL Staff
May 11, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Move

On The Move: Information must be submitted at least 11 days prior to the Wednesday issue in which the announcement will appear. Digital images should be 200 dpi and saved as eps, tiff or jpeg. Color images are preferred. For more information or to submit an announcement, contact managing editor Kelly Lucas at klucas@ibj.com

ELECTIONS & APPOINTMENTS

H. Patrick Callahan, a partner with Baker & Daniels in Indianapolis, has been named to the national board of advisors of the Legal Sales and Service Organization. He will serve a two-year board term.

Beth Bechdol, director of agribusiness strategies at Ice Miller in Indianapolis, has been elected to the board of directors of the National Grain and Feed Association. She will serve a three-year term.

Gregory M. Feary has been elected president of the law firm of Scopelitis Garvin Light Hanson & Feary in Indianapolis, where he also serves as a managing partner.

The Indiana Chapter of the Association of Legal Administrators elected officers and board of directors members for 2011-2012. New officers and board members include: Karen A. Murphy, Drewry Simmons Vornehm, president; Christine L. Birch, Bose McKinney & Evans, president-elect; David W. Heinekamp, Kightlinger & Gray, treasurer; Debra L. Shrum, LewisWagner, secretary; Debra L. Eslbury, Threlkeld & Associates, past president; Janet C. Valasek, Barnes & Thornburg, education chair; Robin R. Burton, Price Waicukauski & Riley, membership chair; and Susan M. Cutsinger, Riley Bennett & Egloff, special projects chair.

Promotions
Lora Manion has been promoted to corporate attorney in the contract services division of United Water Inc.

New Associations
Kathleen Hart has joined the Indianapolis firm Riley Bennett & Egloff as of counsel. Hart concentrates her practice in civil and commercial litigation.

E. Timothy DeLaney has joined Frost Brown Todd’s Indianapolis office as a senior associate in the litigation department, focusing his practice on commercial litigation and criminal and quasi-criminal matters. Brian R. Bouggy joined the firm’s litigation department as an associate, focusing in the areas of health care and life sciences industries.

Brian Burbrink has joined Wooden & McLaughlin as an associate in the firm’s Indianapolis office. He concentrates his practice in labor and employment, commercial litigation, and product liability defense litigation.

Courtney King has joined Ice Miller as an associate in the firm’s labor and employment practice group in Indianapolis. King will counsel clients on a broad range of employment law matters.

Jason D. Schultz has joined Krieg DeVault as an associate in the firm’s Mishawaka office. His practice involves representing health care clients with transactional and compliance-related issues.

Beth A. Barnes and William D. Beyers have joined Hume Smith Geddes Green & Simmons in Indianapolis as associates.

Tim D. McKay, Sandra L. Davis, Angela L. Hamm, Cari L. Sheehan, Christa J. Jewsbury, and Paul J. Schilling have joined Zionsville law firm Schuckit & Associates as associates.

John C. Brown has joined Taft Stettinius & Hollister’s business and finance group. He is an associate in the firm’s Indianapolis office, concentrating his practice on complex business transactions.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Other than a complete lack of any verifiable and valid historical citations to back your wild context-free accusations, you also forget to allege "ate Native American children, ate slave children, ate their own children, and often did it all while using salad forks rather than dinner forks." (gasp)

  2. "So we broke with England for the right to "off" our preborn progeny at will, and allow the processing plant doing the dirty deeds (dirt cheap) to profit on the marketing of those "products of conception." I was completely maleducated on our nation's founding, it would seem. (But I know the ACLU is hard at work to remedy that, too.)" Well, you know, we're just following in the footsteps of our founders who raped women, raped slaves, raped children, maimed immigrants, sold children, stole property, broke promises, broke apart families, killed natives... You know, good God fearing down home Christian folk! :/

  3. Who gives a rats behind about all the fluffy ranking nonsense. What students having to pay off debt need to know is that all schools aren't created equal and students from many schools don't have a snowball's chance of getting a decent paying job straight out of law school. Their lowly ranked lawschool won't tell them that though. When schools start honestly (accurately) reporting *those numbers, things will get interesting real quick, and the looks on student's faces will be priceless!

  4. Whilst it may be true that Judges and Justices enjoy such freedom of time and effort, it certainly does not hold true for the average working person. To say that one must 1) take a day or a half day off work every 3 months, 2) gather a list of information including recent photographs, and 3) set up a time that is convenient for the local sheriff or other such office to complete the registry is more than a bit near-sighted. This may be procedural, and hence, in the near-sighted minds of the court, not 'punishment,' but it is in fact 'punishment.' The local sheriffs probably feel a little punished too by the overwork. Registries serve to punish the offender whilst simultaneously providing the public at large with a false sense of security. The false sense of security is dangerous to the public who may not exercise due diligence by thinking there are no offenders in their locale. In fact, the registry only informs them of those who have been convicted.

  5. Unfortunately, the court doesn't understand the difference between ebidta and adjusted ebidta as they clearly got the ruling wrong based on their misunderstanding

ADVERTISEMENT