ILNews

On the move - 5/11/11

IL Staff
May 11, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Move

On The Move: Information must be submitted at least 11 days prior to the Wednesday issue in which the announcement will appear. Digital images should be 200 dpi and saved as eps, tiff or jpeg. Color images are preferred. For more information or to submit an announcement, contact managing editor Kelly Lucas at klucas@ibj.com

ELECTIONS & APPOINTMENTS

H. Patrick Callahan, a partner with Baker & Daniels in Indianapolis, has been named to the national board of advisors of the Legal Sales and Service Organization. He will serve a two-year board term.

Beth Bechdol, director of agribusiness strategies at Ice Miller in Indianapolis, has been elected to the board of directors of the National Grain and Feed Association. She will serve a three-year term.

Gregory M. Feary has been elected president of the law firm of Scopelitis Garvin Light Hanson & Feary in Indianapolis, where he also serves as a managing partner.

The Indiana Chapter of the Association of Legal Administrators elected officers and board of directors members for 2011-2012. New officers and board members include: Karen A. Murphy, Drewry Simmons Vornehm, president; Christine L. Birch, Bose McKinney & Evans, president-elect; David W. Heinekamp, Kightlinger & Gray, treasurer; Debra L. Shrum, LewisWagner, secretary; Debra L. Eslbury, Threlkeld & Associates, past president; Janet C. Valasek, Barnes & Thornburg, education chair; Robin R. Burton, Price Waicukauski & Riley, membership chair; and Susan M. Cutsinger, Riley Bennett & Egloff, special projects chair.

Promotions
Lora Manion has been promoted to corporate attorney in the contract services division of United Water Inc.

New Associations
Kathleen Hart has joined the Indianapolis firm Riley Bennett & Egloff as of counsel. Hart concentrates her practice in civil and commercial litigation.

E. Timothy DeLaney has joined Frost Brown Todd’s Indianapolis office as a senior associate in the litigation department, focusing his practice on commercial litigation and criminal and quasi-criminal matters. Brian R. Bouggy joined the firm’s litigation department as an associate, focusing in the areas of health care and life sciences industries.

Brian Burbrink has joined Wooden & McLaughlin as an associate in the firm’s Indianapolis office. He concentrates his practice in labor and employment, commercial litigation, and product liability defense litigation.

Courtney King has joined Ice Miller as an associate in the firm’s labor and employment practice group in Indianapolis. King will counsel clients on a broad range of employment law matters.

Jason D. Schultz has joined Krieg DeVault as an associate in the firm’s Mishawaka office. His practice involves representing health care clients with transactional and compliance-related issues.

Beth A. Barnes and William D. Beyers have joined Hume Smith Geddes Green & Simmons in Indianapolis as associates.

Tim D. McKay, Sandra L. Davis, Angela L. Hamm, Cari L. Sheehan, Christa J. Jewsbury, and Paul J. Schilling have joined Zionsville law firm Schuckit & Associates as associates.

John C. Brown has joined Taft Stettinius & Hollister’s business and finance group. He is an associate in the firm’s Indianapolis office, concentrating his practice on complex business transactions.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT